HomeForumsDirectorySubmit NewsSubscriptionsAbout UsAdvertise

The Good Fight Against the Anti Gun MindSet

Saturday, November 7th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
Tags:

The Good Fight Against the Anti Gun MindSet
by Gerard Valentino

“…it is hard to be treated in such a condescending manner because you actually took the time to study the issue and realize having a gun is the best way to keep your family safe….”

United States Concealed Carry Association

United States Concealed Carry Association

USCCA - -(AmmoLand.com)-Every vocal pro-gun advocate is familiar with the condescending look of so-called friends or family members who are sure we’re nothing but bloodthirsty members of the NRA cult. We’ve all been there when someone belittles our judgment by saying, “I hope you have those guns locked up so your kids won’t get them,” or asking, “Aren’t you afraid you will shoot a family member by accident?” You might even get to hear my favorite silly anti-gun statement, “You know, someone who keeps a gun in the house is 75% more likely to kill a friend of family member than an intruder.”

Personally, I have a family member who is a self-described intellectual and, based on the desire to feed his feelings of superiority, he looks down his nose at anyone who carries a gun for self-defense.

A common answer when asked, “Why do you keep a gun in the house with those kids?” is to simply say, “I have it because I love my children and value their lives.” Usually, that is followed by a nod as if the person asking the question understood my answer, and then a puzzled furrowing of their eyebrows. No reason to go any further at that point, since usually the antagonist walks away wondering if you’ve lost your mind. Jim Irvine, Buckeye Firearms Association’s Chairman, delivers the line better than anyone I’ve met, with equal parts sarcasm and scorn. His delivery is a joy to behold.

But the unfortunate reaction to the social crusaders who want to tell us how to keep our family safe is to react with anger. Nobody wins if that happens since the person spewing the misguided anti-gun propaganda is probably parroting the rhetoric heard on the latest episode of Ellen or Oprah. It only shows a lack of willingness to investigate an issue properly as opposed to true anti-gun feeling. Still, it is hard to be treated in such a condescending manner because you actually took the time to study the issue and realize having a gun is the best way to keep your family safe.

As pro-gun advocates, we have an obligation to lay out our arguments in a calculating and logical manner. To do so isn’t easy. I fail to tolerate the simple minded nature of our anti-gun adversaries on a daily basis. Like most pro-gun advocates it is beyond my ability to comprehend that people still believe in the validity of gun-control after the mounds of evidence that has disproved it over the last thirty years. Even worse is trying to educate the establishment media on how much they don’t understand about guns. Anger is never the answer, however, since it only reinforces the idea that people who own guns can’t be trusted–an ironic twist since it is backward anti-gun ravings that should incur the scorn of every day Americans.

In contrast to my so-called intellectual family member is a sister with an autistic son. There is true concern over keeping a gun in the house under those circumstances, and I have the utmost respect for their decision to not keep one. Although my nephew is a wonderful child, it is simply impossible to adequately teach him not to touch a gun. My sister’s situation teaches me that my choice to own a gun isn’t practical for everyone I come across in daily life. I actually have more respect for people who might want to keep a gun at home but have honest reasons that make it impossible compared to those who simply have their heads in the sand. The same people who think their house is utterly secure scoff at the thought that keeping a gun is akin to having a smoke detector or fire extinguisher.

Some of the people who obsess the most about picking the right car seat, the safest crib and go to great lengths to baby-proof their house don’t take simple precautions to keep their kids from becoming the victim of a gun accident. The benefits of the NRA’s Eddie Eagle program are lost on people who refuse to look at the gun issue logically and instead react out of emotion. A failure to teach your kids how to avoid becoming an accidental gun death is equivalent to not teaching them to be careful with strangers, look both ways before crossing the street, or wear a helmet while riding a bike.

Still, your well-intentioned friends at work don’t see it that way. To many of them, keeping a gun in the house is equal to child abuse because their favorite anti-gun celebrity said so. Their gullible nature has been crafted by years of anti-gun establishment media misinformation and they are also guilty of taking political advice from the likes of Rosie O’Donnell, Sean Penn or Ellen DeGeneres. Only when we succeed in changing the culture will we succeed in changing the minds of those so enamored with celebrity they would vote based on their favorite actor’s political endorsement or demonstrate in front of a Marine Corps recruiting station because their favorite celebrity said it was the right thing to do.

While we have logic, statistics, facts and even moral rightness on our side, one thing pro-gun advocates can’t account for is how hard people will resist changing long-held beliefs. That holds true whether those beliefs are based on emotion, faith, or in the case of gun control, poorly executed social policy. For millions of Americans who grew up in cities such as Chicago, Boston, New York or Washington D.C., the never-ending drumbeat of anti-gun propaganda wore down the citizen’s objectivity. The overwhelming evidence which proves that gun control led to the exact type of crime it was designed to stop leaves people even more confused. They have shut down on the issue and stick by their misguided values.

The simple fact is that the establishment media and media elites in our country are very good at their job. For years that included selling the value of gun-control with the all the gusto they could muster and an uncanny ability to drown out dissent. To overcome that bias will take time and dedication to the cause. It helps that we are right but that only goes so far. Unless all gun owners protect their right to bear arms with unwavering dedication they will one day be confiscated.

It’s our job to keep that from happening.

Gerard Valentino is the Buckeye Firearms Association Central Ohio Coordinator, BuckeyeFirearms.org, teaches the Ohio concealed carry class through Center Mass Ltd. and writes for the ValentinoChronicle.com

Distributed to you by - AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.
Deliciousdelicious | Digg thisDigg it | redditreddit | stumbleStumbleUpon | facebookFacebook | TwitterTwitter

3 Responses to “The Good Fight Against the Anti Gun MindSet”

  1. Nice article.

    I like that “bloodthirsty members of the NRA cult” as if the defender of America’s rights, a wildlife, wetlands and forest conservator, a trainer of children in the “woodlore” and safety of guns, a promoter of outdoor sports and competitions and a patriotic and politically active organization for more than 100 years is a “cult”…laughter .

    Keep up the good work. Thank you.

  2. owlafaye on November 7th, 2009 at 10:03 pm
  3. The problem is you have a member on the board at NRA; John Cushman who is a liar to his own people.

    He goes on video and says his ’son’ is in the military. He doesn’t have a son..

    He has two daughters.

    Also he comments that his college degrees. John L. Cushman isn’t a college graduate.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KgGvSjw7Ng

    So the man fights for gun rights, but lies to his own people. What does that tell you?

    Watch the video of him lying to his people.

  4. Mike Downling on November 23rd, 2009 at 12:19 pm
  5. I don’t know where this guy did his research, but there isn’t a grain of truth in his post. Care should be exercised when making posts like his as you could really find yourself in trouble with both the law and John’s son, who might not like being called a daughter…

    Mike Downling wrote on November 23rd, 2009 at 12:19 pm:

    “The problem is you have a member on the board at NRA; John Cushman who is a liar to his own people. He goes on video and says his ’son’ is in the military. He doesn’t have a son.. He has two daughters. Also he comments that his college degrees. John L. Cushman isn’t a college graduate.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KgGvSjw7Ng
    So the man fights for gun rights, but lies to his own people. What does that tell you?
    Watch the video of him lying to his people.”

    There is no truth in any way shape or form to Mr. Dowling’s post. John L. Cushman is a tireless fighter for second amendment rights for the last forty years.

    He has been on the NYS Conservation Council, was a founder of Suffolk Alliance of Sportsman Inc., is a founder of Sportsman’s Association for Firearms Education (SAFE http://www.nysafe.org ), and has been on the Board of the NRA for sixteen? years, as well as the Board of the Whittington Center. His son, John D. Cushman, was just commissioned a full Colonel in the US Army, and is being assigned to the War College, a transfer from his post as a Lt. Col as the Garrison Commander of Camp Parks, see link
    http://www.usarc.army.mil/cstc/sites/commander/garrisoncommander.asp.

    I have met him, as well as .John’s daughter. John L. Cushman has a degree in Labor Relations (not sure of the exact words) from Cornell University which he received in ’78 or ’79. John is the current president of SAFE, and with their board of Directors, does a pretty good job of keeping the area politicians on their toes (as much as can be) and working to keep what rights we have and work toward getting back what we have lost. John may be a bit headstrong sometimes, but you can be sure he is working to do the best he can to protect our Second Amendment rights.

    My biggest question is what is the motive behind this attempt to smear someone who is working as hard as he can to help our cause? What possible gain is there? Everything I’ve said here is easily proven, nothing the previous poster has said is able to be proven, except that John is in the video on youtube and possibly that this posters name is Mike Downling.

    Do your homework, then YOU decide…

  6. Bill Raab on November 25th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

Leave a Comment