How TF did that happen? These Jews need an epiphany on the Second Amendment more than anyone.

If that view were valid the States would have full freedom of oppression of gun owners. We “gun nuts,” though, are able to tell the Feds to go pound sand when they get all juiced up for a bit of infringement. So our hypothetical acceptance of the Left-handed view means the States are in no way involved in the matter.

We now have the Federal government–constitutionally prohibited to do so–declaring that citizens must vacate a constitutionally protected right when they enter property controlled by the Feds. That is the case with Ft. Hood and any other military base.

How hard would it be for an ably represented affected soldier to win the verdict if he posed a legal challenge to the infringement? The fact is that a judge hearing his case in any Federal District court ought to be subject to discipline if he allowed anyone’s time to be spent on substantive argument. The judge would be obliged by any oath judges swear to enter a summary judgment suppressing the Army’s order.

I would love it if some troop who has an unblemished record over many re-enlistments and combat tours simply to walk on base (very likely to be stopped at the main gate) with a holstered 1911 strapped to his waist (or even one of those prissy Beretta 9s). We Good Guys could then en masse ask Counseler Gura of Heller vs. District of Columbia fame–as well as many other encounters–to take a half hour off from McDonald vs. City of Chicago and wipe up a Federal courtroom with whoever dared represent the Army. Just a thought, but a bit of fantasy never hurt anyone.