Comments on: Man’s Law Kills Again – The Sin of Gun Free Zones

By: Arizona: Comprehensive Firearms Reform Bill Passes in the Senate

Arizona: Comprehensive Firearms Reform Bill Passes in the Senate — Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:30:25 +0000

[...] view the current firearms or gun rights news video, please click above:Read More on these topics:Man’s Law Kills Again – The Sin of Gun Free ZonesEnd Absurd Policy of Military Gun Free ZonesGun-Free Zones An Open Invitation For Psychotic Killers [...]

By: The Coming Gun Battle to Keep & Bear Arms

The Coming Gun Battle to Keep & Bear Arms — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:35:09 +0000

[...] possession of weapons for selfdefense through measures like safe-storage, triggerlock laws, and gun-free zones. Restrictions on concealed- and open-carry of firearms have the capacity to make weapons [...]

By: Aaron S. Zelman Executive Director of JPFO Passes

Aaron S. Zelman Executive Director of JPFO Passes — Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:24:35 +0000

[...] Gun Control Act’s direct connection to Nazi gun control law and by exposing the stupidity of Gun Free Zones.Aaron had a take no prisoners way of thinking and challenged everyone from the NRA, to Washington [...]

By: The Twin Cities Carry Journal › Blawg Review #238: Celebrating the International Day of Tolerance … and the NRA’s Birthday

Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:37:52 +0000

[...] Matters rends its garments over how the Hasan shooting hasn’t, unlike previous shootings in victim disarmament zones, excited a flurry of gun control discussion and perhaps yet more [...]

By: Luis

Luis — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:23:09 +0000

Somehow, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership overlooked Schumer, Feinstein, Boxer, Lautenberg, Schakowsky, Nadler, Emmanuel and Bloomberg, when it came to “educating Jews about firearms ownership”.

How TF did that happen? These Jews need an epiphany on the Second Amendment more than anyone.

By: Flavet

Flavet — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:09:40 +0000

For this and other Army-post discussions, let us accept as a hypothetical a tenet of the anti-gun Left. Our “hypothetical” label protects us from an allegation that we agree with the Left on that proposition. Their insistence is that the Second Amendment is incumbent only on the Federal government and not on the States.

If that view were valid the States would have full freedom of oppression of gun owners. We “gun nuts,” though, are able to tell the Feds to go pound sand when they get all juiced up for a bit of infringement. So our hypothetical acceptance of the Left-handed view means the States are in no way involved in the matter.

We now have the Federal government–constitutionally prohibited to do so–declaring that citizens must vacate a constitutionally protected right when they enter property controlled by the Feds. That is the case with Ft. Hood and any other military base.

How hard would it be for an ably represented affected soldier to win the verdict if he posed a legal challenge to the infringement? The fact is that a judge hearing his case in any Federal District court ought to be subject to discipline if he allowed anyone’s time to be spent on substantive argument. The judge would be obliged by any oath judges swear to enter a summary judgment suppressing the Army’s order.

I would love it if some troop who has an unblemished record over many re-enlistments and combat tours simply to walk on base (very likely to be stopped at the main gate) with a holstered 1911 strapped to his waist (or even one of those prissy Beretta 9s). We Good Guys could then en masse ask Counseler Gura of Heller vs. District of Columbia fame–as well as many other encounters–to take a half hour off from McDonald vs. City of Chicago and wipe up a Federal courtroom with whoever dared represent the Army. Just a thought, but a bit of fantasy never hurt anyone.