<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Extending Firearms Preemption To College Campuses</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ammoland.com/2009/11/16/extending-firearms-preemption-to-college-campuses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ammoland.com/2009/11/16/extending-firearms-preemption-to-college-campuses/</link> <description>Shooting Sports News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:55:40 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tom Henderson</title><link>http://www.ammoland.com/2009/11/16/extending-firearms-preemption-to-college-campuses/comment-page-1/#comment-7892</link> <dc:creator>Tom Henderson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:32:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ammoland.com/?p=20389#comment-7892</guid> <description>Persons opposed to pre-emption on MI college campuses can offer up Utah campuses as a relatively long-standing example of what happens when CPL holders are not pre-empted, ie:  nothing.  No blood in the streets.  No teenagers in on-campus shoot-outs.  And most importantly, NO GUN-FREE ZONE MASSACRES perpetrated by criminals exploiting the knowledge that there will be no armed resistance to their acts.The concerns expressed by those who are promoting on-campus pre-emption are clearly fallacy and are easily falsified.  Anyone who is truly concerned about preventing gun violence on-campus would be pro-carry.  Those opposed to on-campus carry (including the MCRGO member cited as a co-sponsor of the bill) are promoting a political agenda and are using false safety concerns as a smoke screen.Thanks,Tom Henderson</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Persons opposed to pre-emption on MI college campuses can offer up Utah campuses as a relatively long-standing example of what happens when CPL holders are not pre-empted, ie:  nothing.  No blood in the streets.  No teenagers in on-campus shoot-outs.  And most importantly, NO GUN-FREE ZONE MASSACRES perpetrated by criminals exploiting the knowledge that there will be no armed resistance to their acts.</p><p>The concerns expressed by those who are promoting on-campus pre-emption are clearly fallacy and are easily falsified.  Anyone who is truly concerned about preventing gun violence on-campus would be pro-carry.  Those opposed to on-campus carry (including the MCRGO member cited as a co-sponsor of the bill) are promoting a political agenda and are using false safety concerns as a smoke screen.</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Tom Henderson</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using memcached

Served from: ammoland.net @ 2010-03-20 13:38:06 -->