Today is Wednesday, May 16, 2012rss RSS feed

Statement From The National Rifle Association On H.R. 5175, The Disclose Act
Gunrights groups question NRA deal “NRA Cuts Questionable Deal with Democrats

National Rifle Association

National Rifle Association

Charlotte, NC --(Ammoland.com)- The National Rifle Association believes that any restrictions on the political speech of Americans are unconstitutional.

In the past, through the courts and in Congress, the NRA has opposed any effort to restrict the rights of its four million members to speak and have their voices heard on behalf of gun owners nationwide.

The NRA’s opposition to restrictions on political speech includes its May 26, 2010 letter to Members of Congress expressing strong concerns about H.R. 5175, the DISCLOSE Act. As it stood at the time of that letter, the measure would have undermined or obliterated virtually all of the NRA’s right to free political speech and, therefore, jeopardized the Second Amendment rights of every law-abiding American.

The most potent defense of the Second Amendment requires the most adamant exercise of the First Amendment. The NRA stands absolutely obligated to its members to ensure maximum access to the First Amendment, in order to protect and preserve the freedom of the Second Amendment.

The NRA must preserve its ability to speak. It cannot risk a strategy that would deny its rights, for the Second Amendment cannot be defended without them.

Thus, the NRA’s first obligation must be to its members and to its most ardent defense of firearms freedom for America’s lawful gun owners.

On June 14, 2010, Democratic leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives pledged that H.R. 5175 would be amended to exempt groups like the NRA, that meet certain criteria, from its onerous restrictions on political speech. As a result, and as long as that remains the case, the NRA will not be involved in final consideration of the House bill.

The NRA cannot defend the Second Amendment from the attacks we face in the local, state, federal, international and judicial arenas without the ability to speak. We will not allow ourselves to be silenced while the national news media, politicians and others are allowed to attack us freely.

The NRA will continue to fight for its right to speak out in defense of the Second Amendment. Any efforts to silence the political speech of NRA members will, as has been the case in the past, be met with strong opposition.

In related news NJ is considering a similar bill.

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 11 User comments to “Statement From The National Rifle Association On H.R. 5175, The Disclose Act”

    1. [...] Association for Gun RightsNRAWashington DCNRA Cuts Questionable Deal with Democrats See NRA statement on H.R. 5175, The Disclose Act.National Association for Gun RightsWashington, DC – -(Ammoland.com)- Three [...]

    2. Comment link | NRA Cuts Questionable Deal with Democrats | June 15th, 2010 at 6:10 PM
    3. [...] LobbyistWashington DCNRA & Shuler Torpedo Gun Rights Organizations See NRA’s statement regarding the Disclose Act.Grass Roots North Carolina for Firearms EducationNorth Carolina –(AmmoLand.com)- ACT NOW… or [...]

    4. Comment link | NRA Torpedos Gun Rights Organizations | June 16th, 2010 at 1:51 PM
    5. [...] on political spending.” – Roll Call, 6/15/2010The NRA response (which can be read here) is somewhat different than you might get on the phone if you call NRA HQ.Some members are [...]

    6. Comment link | Wall Street Journal Confirms NRA Sell-Out | June 16th, 2010 at 4:11 PM
    7. [...] is not being gored in this instance.The NRA, which had previously opposed the DISCLOSE Act, has now accepted a deal to exempt that organization from the bill.This is a startling about-face by the association.When the Supreme Court ruled in favor of political [...]

    8. Comment link | Gun Owner Free Speech Gag Bill Moving in House | June 16th, 2010 at 4:56 PM
    9. [...] by not fighting a bill that will gag the free speech of those who criticize members of Congress.The NRA, in a news release, has said it will turn a blind eye to H.R. 5175, the DISCLOSE Act, since it exempts the NRA.Bottom [...]

    10. Comment link | NRA Sells Out Grassroots To Congressional Anti-Gunners | June 16th, 2010 at 7:37 PM
    11. [...] Owners Needs to Stay Focused On The Big Prize RE: Statement From The NRA On H.R. 5175, The Disclose ActLetters to the AmmoLand Editor: Got something on your mind? Let us know and you can see it [...]

    12. Comment link | Gun Owners Needs to Stay Focused On The Big Prize | June 18th, 2010 at 8:57 PM
    13. I cannot begin to comprehend the NRA taking a position of trusting the current majority in the house and senate. They have proven they are not men and women of virtue and principle over and over. We must be bold and speak out and not cut deals hoping for integrity on the part of the current power brokers. This action was not in the best interests of the NRA members or the American Citizens!!

    14. Comment link | Walter Laakkonen | June 22nd, 2010 at 10:25 AM
    15. [...] this case, it is the National Rifle Association that has literally decided to sit this one out. After swearing that the freedom and right to bear [...]

    16. Comment link | » ‘Reinventing Journalism,’ Courtesy Of the Censors’ Cabal, Part One - Big Journalism | June 22nd, 2010 at 6:43 PM
    17. Disclose Act Will Choke First Amendment.

      The Neomarxist behind the Obama/FTC intend to drown out the voice of America with Obama/Marxist propaganda, enforcing new regulations that will cripple bloggers and other alternative media from disseminating information, free speech that grass-roots among other organizations depend on to make informed decisions. Obama’s support of the DISCLOSE Act confirmed what many Americans already believed; that Obama and certain Democrats in Congress intend to strangle the flow of information. If Obama and his leftists associations get their way, our Children will be brainwashed by Obama’s one-sided propaganda at school, through Obama controlled Radio, TV and Obama media policies that restrict the free flow of information. Historically when communists attempted or took over a country, one of their first steps was to control the media and all forms of public communications to control Civilian populations. When Russia took over Hungary, it immediately took control of the Radio stations to thwart Citizen resistance and to psychologically control the People. Considering the Obama administration’s obsession with controlling all media, one might ask, are some of the same persons inside and outside U.S. Government working with the Obama administration to push the Disclose Act and other censorship regulations, involved in causes that promulgate overthrow of the United States? While some in the Obama Government say they support dismantling capitalism, brick by brick, does their endgame call for destruction of the United States? If it does, what should Americans do to stop it? Does the Obama administration’s proposed censorship of free speech e.g., the Disclose Act threaten National Security? In other countries where members of political parties and ideological extremists attempted or succeeded in this kind of forced censorship, forbidding Citizens to receive information, they have been arrested for treason among other crimes. The Obama administration appears intended to curtail Americans’ right to know, restrict American’s right to communicate via the Internet and the Obama administration admits they want to pay writers in newspapers and other media to covertly propagandize their point of view. Is this not treason? Top CZAR Cass Sunstein prepared a 2008 paper that proposed spying on Americans, infiltrating groups and organizations to obstruct Free Speech, disrupt the exchange of ideas and disseminate false information to neutralize Americans that might question government.
      See: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=121884

      The majority of Americans oppose military governments. But increasingly during the last six months, more Americans quietly state they would trust the U.S. Military running U.S. Government temporarily over extremists in Obam’s government; that they would support a quasi Civilian/military form of government temporarily provided their civil and constitutional rights were protected and importantly, all leftists extremists in U.S. Government were deposed. This recent change of attitude by Americans might be explained by the fact they can relate to their U.S. Military and find nothing in common with Obama and his extreme leftist associations and supporters. Increasingly Americans appear to fear the Obama government more than the idea of having the U.S. Military temporarily run U.S. Government. Additionally Obama’s refusal to secure America’s Mexican border might have contributed to Americans identifying with a quasi/U.S. military government over an Obama government that won’t protect Border States from foreign invaders. The number of Marxists in the U.S. is small, but having them control any part of our government is repugnant to most Americans that believe it not in the best interest of our economy, national defense and National Security. Considering the direction America is going economically, more Americans are afraid that if things collapse, Obama might use the U.S. Military against U.S. Citizens; that should things collapse a quasi Civilian/U.S. Military government not the Obama administration should run America. This is mentioned only to note there is a strong wind blowing across America, that is howling enough Obama.

    18. Comment link | Ross Wolf | June 23rd, 2010 at 4:05 AM
    19. Benjamin Franklin said,

      “We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

      -In the Continental Congress just before signing the Declaration of Independence, 1776

      contrasted to

      David Keene, NRA First Vice-President said,

      “The NRA is a non-partisan, single-issue organization made up of millions of individual members dedicated to the protection of the Second Amendment. We do not represent the interests of other organizations. That’s their responsibility. Our responsibility is to protect and defend the interests of our members. And that we do without apology.”

      -In an email NRA-ILA Grassroots Alert Vol. 17, No. 24 dated June 18, 2010 as they accepted the House exemption just before the house passed HR 5175.

    20. Comment link | Elliott | June 25th, 2010 at 2:07 AM
    21. [...] NRA NewsTo view the current video in its new format, please click above:Read More on these topics:Statement From The NRA On H.R. 5175, The Disclose ActNRA Elbows Its Way Into The Mcdonald CaseNRA Cuts Questionable Deal with DemocratsAbout: Established [...]

    22. Comment link | Did the National Rifle Association Buy Congress | March 25th, 2011 at 11:46 AM

    Leave a Comment

    • Firearms News Daily sign up

      captcha

    • Recent Comments

      • Robert Krawiec: Lets vote out all incumbants, they have forgotten who put them there and why they were elected.If all...
      • carlos: Why do we vote for these gutless morons. Holder has obviously broken several laws and is guilty of...
      • Henry Stalin: I’m in Ohio and will be leaving soon because Ohio Sucks. They want to be big time northeastern...
      • TSgt B: Very wise and prudent advice. I have tried all three avenues, with a good deal of success. However, there...
      • Craig: Jeremy… if you are a hunter, how could you lose respect for Nugen because of his comments about Obama?...
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    Copyright 2012 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ