Today is Tuesday, September 02, 2014rss RSS feed

By David A. Lien

Backcountry Hunters and Anglers

Backcountry Hunters and Anglers

Joseph, OR --(Ammoland.com)- As a big game hunter and former Air Force officer who cares deeply about our country and its wild public lands heritage, I’m constantly amazed by the apparent naivety of some who espouse anti-wilderness rhetoric.

Even though hunting, angling, and wildlife watching are enjoyed by some 87.5 million Americans, sometimes we forget that not everyone realizes the importance of our protected public lands.

Recently, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 4089, the Sportsmen’s Heritage Act. While hunters and anglers support numerous parts of this bill, there are specific details that could result in enormous negative consequences for world-renowned hunting and fishing destinations, conservation, and public lands fish and wildlife habitat.

Included in the Sportsmen’s Heritage Act is specific language that would undermine the proud heritage American sportsmen have been defending for generations:

First, Section 104(e) (1) in H.R. 4089 would open Wilderness Areas to motorized vehicles, helicopters, road building and any other imaginable tool that is used for hunting or fishing, but is not allowed in Wilderness. This would undermine world class hunting destinations such as the Bob Marshall Wilderness in Montana, the Frank Church Wilderness in Idaho, and the Weminuche Wilderness in Colorado.

Second, Section 104(e) (2) would allow industrial development of Wilderness areas. Activities such as industrial logging and oil and gas drilling are inappropriate for our nation’s Wilderness areas.

Third, we have problems with language under 104(1) (b) and 104(1) (c) that would prohibit adequate NEPA review of management decisions. The way the language is written in this section, it could actually result in less hunting opportunity.

In fact, expanding wilderness protection (the gold standard for wildlife habitat and backcountry hunting/angling grounds) for public lands enhances hunting and fishing and our economy and quality of life. A recent Colorado College State of the Rockies Project poll showed that 96 percent of sportsmen in six western states agreed with the statement that “our national parks, forests, monuments, and wildlife areas are an essential part of Colorado’s quality of life.”

Unfortunately, today a mere 5 percent of Colorado is designated wilderness: only 3.5 million acres out of 66 million. And only 2.5 percent of the Lower 48 is protected as wilderness. That’s simply not enough. Although some OHV (and other) groups constantly oppose wilderness protection on “access” grounds, only 8 percent of the National Forest acreage in Colorado lies beyond one mile of a road (only 4 percent for BLM lands), and there are enough Forest Service roads in the state to go from the Kansas border to Utah and back, 17 times.

Lifelong Colorado hunter-angler (and WW II veteran) Bill Sustrich hit the nail on the head when he said, “From my own observations, I have seen nothing yet created by mankind that offers the degree of habitat protection that is achieved through wilderness designation.”[1]

These public land designations are the Holy Grail for hunters, anglers, hikers, backpackers, climbers, equestrians, outfitters, and outdoor enthusiasts everywhere and need to be protected, not plundered.

David A. Lien
Co-Chairman, Colorado
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers
www.coloradobackcountryhunters.org

About:
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers (BHA): BHA is built on a foundation laid down by conservationists like Theodore Roosevelt and Aldo Leopold, who understood that America’s outdoor heritage depends upon healthy ecosystems. BHA’s work is steeped in the values of freedom, challenge, family and adventure, yet at the same time is couched in the sciences of biology and ecology. BHA strives to lead by example, both in the realm of land and water conservation and the realm of ethical hunting and fishing. Our view is not limited to the “here and now,” but extends to the needs and rights of future generations of outdoorsmen and women. Visit: www.backcountryhunters.org

[1] Bill Sustrich. “Browns Canyon.” Landscapes: December 2009, p. 5

  • 3 User comments to “HR 4089 – Bad For Backcountry Hunting & Fishing”

    1. HuntersDB.com Daily Digest for April 20 - Hunting the numbersHunting the numbers on April 20, 2012 at 10:39 AM said:

      [...] OREGON – OPINION: HR 4089 – Bad for backcountry hunting and fishing As a big game hunter and former Air Force officer who cares deeply about our country and its wild public lands heritage, I’m constantly amazed by the apparent naivety of some who espouse anti-wilderness rhetoric. Even though hunting, angling, and wildlife watching are enjoyed by some 87.5 million Americans, sometimes we forget that not everyone realizes the importance of our protected public lands. Recently, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 4089, the Sportsmen’s Heritage Act. While hunters and anglers support numerous parts of this bill, there are specific details that could result in enormous negative consequences for world-renowned hunting and fishing destinations, conservation, and public lands fish and wildlife habitat. Included in the Sportsmen’s Heritage Act is specific language that would undermine the proud heritage American sportsmen have been defending for generations. MORE [...]

    2. [...] all hunting groups are supporting the bill. Backcountry Hunters & Anglers said it believes H.R. 4809l would have immense negative consequences for hunters and [...]

    3. Bill E on May 30, 2012 at 2:47 PM said:

      David, I read the section 104 and do not see what you are describing. can you break down the text with your opinion as to what it means.

      Best regards

      Bill E

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Bob Crooz: Actually, it was SDPD Chief Lansdowne who retired. Ruby Ridge Gore ran unopposed. I left the selection for...
      • Herb: If you favor Marxism, socialism and communism, vote for democrats. If you favor of higher prices for...
      • JamesMadison: If you are looking for a quality made 80 lower receiver for a great price, check out...
      • DebJar: Has anyone noticed that the southern border of Connecticut resembles a rifle. The little bump to the far...
      • Leo Smith: If Bloomberg realized how much of his “Money” is being redistributed he might be angry.
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • AmmoLand Poll

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    13690664
    14300000