Today is Friday, August 22, 2014rss RSS feed

By Bill Horn

No Hunting Terrarium

Public Lands: Biospheres Under Glass? Not If USSA Can Help It

U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance

U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance

Columbus, OH --(Ammoland.com)- As regular U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance readers know, on April 17th, the House of Representatives passed the most important fishing and hunting bill in 15 years – HR 4089, The Sportsmen’s Heritage Act – by a lopsided 274 to 146 vote.

A bipartisan majority of 235 Republicans and 39 Democrats voted yes. The bill has two fundamental features: (1) establishing that 700 million acres of federal public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service are open to fishing, hunting, and recreational, as a matter of law, until or unless closed for good specific reasons and (2) confirming recent EPA decisions that the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act does not allow the agency to regulate lead in fishing gear or ammunition.

The overwhelming support from America’s real conservationists, the angling and hunting community, demonstrates this is good public policy and ought to be non-controversial.

But nothing in Washington, D.C. ever is. So it’s little surprise that the usual suspects are screaming about the bill and peddling disinformation about what it does. We’re told that this fishing and hunting bill is really about opening lands to oil and gas development or forcing the National Park Service to allow hunting on the National Mall.

Aside from the fact that these specious claims are utter nonsense, what prompts this over-the-top reaction to a fishing and hunting bill?

We know the answer for the animal rights radicals like HSUS, Peta and the Animal Legal Defense League etc. They simply oppose any and all hunting. We’re frankly thrilled to see them foaming at the mouth in opposition – it confirms the bill does indeed protect fishing and hunting on our federal public lands.

Look, But Don’t Touch
For others like The Wilderness Society, Defenders of Wildlife, the Sierra Club, and National Parks Conservation Association, the answer is more subtle and fundamental. Their goals are to manage public lands as “biospheres under glass.” Lands where public access is barred or heavily restricted; where the public stands outside with its nose pressed against the glass looking in. And if you’re allowed onto the lands, you have to be part of a controlled group and have your hand held by a special guide or ranger to ensure that you are acting in an “environmentally correct” manner; where the public is reduced to voyeurism – look but don’t touch. We see it year after year in repeated efforts – legal and political – to limit public access and use of public lands. Unfortunately for many of our urban brethren who don’t fish and hunt, and get most of their “nature” via a HDTV program; being herded into a group or told to stand outside and merely peer in is ok.

Sportsmen Interact With the Environment
This attitude is a stark contrast to anglers and hunters. We interact with the natural environment. We are predators acting within an ecosystem. And heaven forbid, we’re usually on our own! This prized interaction creates connections to the wild world. It spurs passion and an abiding commitment to conservation. It’s not mere happenstance that the American conservation movement was founded by connected and committed anglers and hunters. And it’s not happenstance that we commit well over a billion $$ every year for fish and wildlife conservation via our license fees, duck stamps, trout stamps, excise taxes and contributions of time and millions more to myriad fish and wildlife conservation organizations.

Interaction = Conservation
Interaction creates connections creating commitment leading to conservation. We’re not about to roll over and buy into putting our public lands under a glass dome. We want to “touch”, we like getting cold and dirty or hot and wet in pursuit of our favorite game or fish. It makes us passionate and keeps us paying the tab for fish and wildlife conservation – for everyone’s benefit (even those who don’t pay a dime and fight us every step).

A bipartisan majority in the House figured this out. Let’s hope the U.S. Senate – with very different leadership – gets the message too.

About:
The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance is a national association of sportsmen and sportsmen’s organizations that protects the rights of hunters, anglers and trappers in the courts, legislatures, at the ballot, in Congress and through public education programs. Visit www.ussportsmen.org.

  • 3 User comments to “Public Lands: Biospheres Under Glass? Not If USSA Can Help It”

    1. Environmentalist here: We understand the individuals need for goodness sake Robert Redford made the beautiful movie A River Runs Through It about fly fishing – Bob is a huge environmentalist. So don’t set up that straw argument – what the middle and left oppose is violence for violence sake – what we understand is the balance of nature – with over 7 Billion people on the planet we have to keep run away degradation at bay. What would be excellent is if the individual sportsmen and hunters came out against long line fishing – the indiscriminate sweeping of the oceans, factory farming which abuses antibiotics and destroys our waterways, or smokestack pollution which spreads mercury and lead poisoning, or even voluntarily took the lead out of lures, shot gun shells and buck shot. Because as you state you know the woods and other predators feed on kill that’s left behind.

      Speak up for common sense regulation as passionately as you advocate for the right to carry a weapon and together the left, right and center can “govern” better. It’s not the individual – its the permanent incorporation of individuals that create the biggest foot print. Culling herds, actually using what you kill for food – its all part of the environmental chain – but mass destruction like what occurred to the buffalo out on the great plains – is short sighted. We environmentalist also realize guns, weapons are a huge business – but the bigger the business the more potential it has to do horrific destruction – whether its Columbine, VCU or Monsanto altering our food with herbicides.

      Speak up for other issues as loudly as you can regarding the overall general well being and balance of the very environment that actually sustains us and then maybe more people will appreciate the individual sportsman’s point of view. Until then you just sound like your right to shed blood and wander around in the woods alone trumps everything else. Remember these are public lands and as much as you ridicule the east and west coast cities – that’s where the majority of the population lives and the majority of the tax revenues come from. Tax revenues that get dispersed throughout all 50 states.

      Government is not the problem – pitting left versus right citizen against citizen is the problem and those that do that practice the art of deception – Greed is the problem – profit over health is the problem. It always has been and always will be a question of balance – government is the cop on the beat that is supposed to manage that balance in the market place and keep it running smoothly for everyone. Single issue campaigns/voters/advocacy groups screw up the works – there’s a bigger picture that needs to be taken into account its complex and interrelated and requires cooperation.

    2. Peter Geller on May 3, 2012 at 11:59 AM said:

      Thanks for the comment Paul. As a person who believes many progressive views I also believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. I think I understand what the Founding Fathers were trying to say and feel strongly enough about the 2nd Amendment that I will defend it with my life. That being said I think that as foresighted as the Founding Fathers were they had no idea of the greed that would beset politics in the future. We have been at that point for many years now where I believe that the corporations have more say regarding legislation than the people. I cannot believe anything that almost all politicians say that they stand for. Once elected they either do the opposite of what they campaigned for or blame their lack of success on the other party. To me it looks like the only thing they stand for is deflection so we don’t notice that their true motive is to line their own pockets and those of their “friends”. Until we can separate greed from politics I fear we are doomed to failure. In addition many depend on these failed policies and lies to create businesses they depend on for their well being. I have no problem with being wrong however, and hope with all my heart that our future proves me wrong in this case.

    3. Peter Geller on May 3, 2012 at 12:00 PM said:

      Correction: I should have stated that I feel that way about all of our guaranteed rights. I too can be shortsighted.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Tim: This is an awesome light and exactly what I wanted. It works really well at night and the green laser worked...
      • Greg: The liberals in c-ville with their damaged amygdala’s have Mr Jefferson rolling in his grave, if alive...
      • jd: Quick! Black man down! Somebody call Holder and The Ghostbusters!!!
      • Janek: Another a$$hole killing in the name of religion. If the murders were committed ‘on the job’ it...
      • Paul Markel: Eric, spoken like a well-behaved slave.
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • AmmoLand Poll

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    13681344
    14287032