Today is Wednesday, August 27, 2014rss RSS feed

By Frank Jack Fiamingo

Common Ground, Gun Control

Common Ground, Gun Control

New Jersey Second Amendment Society

New Jersey Second Amendment Society

New Jersey --(Ammoland.com)- Most people will acknowledge that it is not guns but rather the misuse of guns that is the real problem.

I believe that most “gun control” advocates simply want to prevent the loss of innocent life and that those of us who use firearms for sport, hunting, recreation and defense of self and family abhor the initiation of violence.

We all want the same thing; to see an end to the senseless slaughter. There is more common ground than one might at first suspect.

The difficulty revolves around how different people believe we can and should solve the actual problem of violence.

I am sure we would all be just as horrified if a murderer used a bomb, a machete or a gun. Perhaps we all need to focus on what drives a person to kill rather than on how they achieve their goal. The result is always the same. Families will never again share the joy of life with their murdered loved ones. They are left to mourn and grieve while trying to understand the incomprehensible.

All the rhetoric in the world will not solve the real problem. There are truly evil people in the world who murder for their own reasons. Some kill for gain, some to avoid responsibility and (as much as it sickens rational people), some individuals kill because they enjoy it. In many cases, I am sure the murderer is simply deranged.

A significant reason why we cannot prevent these murders is simply because we cannot predict them. Although it is not common, a person who appears perfectly normal one day, may experience a break from reality, choose a weapon and begin murdering people for absolutely no reason. We often have no indication whatsoever who that person might be. The arm-chair analysts who perform the post mortems on these events are never there the day before to prevent them.

If they were, we would not need to have this conversation.

Some people believe that you can reduce the number of murders by controlling both the availability and the type of firearms people are allowed to possess. The problem is that although this approach MIGHT possibly prevent a murderer from using a particular firearm to commit his crime, it is FAR from a guarantee that he or she will not find another method of creating mayhem. In fact, since only those individuals who are sane and responsible follow the dictates of firearms regulations, it is unlikely that laws controlling the LEGAL access to firearms would prevent the murderer from using them.

You might say, “Well it can’t hurt”, but that is not accurate. It can and does hurt to prevent legal access to firearms to a woman seeking to protect her body from a much larger assailant or to a parent protecting his or her family from a neighborhood gang intent on stealing the family car and raping the occupants. I find it difficult to believe that THAT is the intent of those who are trying to PREVENT the murder of innocent people. That just doesn’t make any sense.

I did not write this essay with the illusion that I could single handedly solve the problem of “gun control” in New Jersey or across the nation. I am hoping that it will be possible to open up some real productive dialogue on how we can work together with people who hold various positions on this issue to make some progress toward finding some practical solutions. Perhaps there is no way to prevent random acts of violence but perhaps we can try to identify those instances where there are telltale signs; perhaps not. I don’t know if that is possible but what I do know is that it is just as unproductive to shout “FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!” as it is to shout “GUNS KILL!”.

I invite anyone with a constructive opinion on these issues to feel free to contact me. Let’s at least think about the problem constructively and try to avoid the usual rhetoric. We already know THAT doesn’t work. Everyone seems to continue to offer the same arguments expecting different results. Perhaps we are all missing something.

Thank you
Frank Jack Fiamingo
President@nj2as.com

About:
New Jersey Second Amendment Society – Our mission is to promote the free exercise of Second Amendment rights within the community and Legislature of New Jersey, to educate the community regarding the enjoyable, safe, and responsible use of firearms, and to engender a sense of camaraderie and fellowship among the members and their families. Visit: www.nj2as.com

  • 2 User comments to “Common Ground On Gun Control?”

    1. EthanP on July 25, 2012 at 8:23 PM said:

      I am a gun owner and shooter. So are many of my friends. On the other hand, many of my friends are anti gun. I assure you that few in the anti group are reasonable and seek accomidation with gun owners. They want to ban handguns, period. Ditto all semi autos. Annd severely restrict rifles and shotguns. They will not listen to any argument. They are so afraid of guns they will not go to the range with me. Ever. This idea that there is a middle ground, if only we’ll talk is smoke. The political anti’s want the power that comes with an unarmed society. The hopliphobes are too affraid to listen to reason. I believe you are in earnest Mr Flamingo. But you are an all too rare exception.

    2. Peter Geller on July 26, 2012 at 7:19 PM said:

      Hey Frank,
      Hope you don’t mind me being informal but if we’re going to be working together I figure it’s a good start. I don’t believe that any limit on inanimate objects is the answer. The AWB of 1994 to 2004 did nothing and the idea that an AR15 with a 100 round magazine could do more damage than pump shotgun and experience is a fallacy. If you look at Columbine, one of the offenders used a Hi Point 9mm Carbine and had 13 ten round magazines. He managed over 90 rounds, more than his counterpart fired with his high capacity magazines. So there’s a couple of examples of one problem. That problem is that anti-gun people usually have little experience with firearms, other than movies and the news, and have many misconceptions of how firearms actually perform.

      What needs to be done is to limit the criminals and unstable people’s use of firearms. In my opinion the best way to do this is by strengthening the NICS system already used by the FBI. There should also be a database regarding psychiatric issues linked to the NICS database. which was supposed to take place after the VA Tech massacre. Then if you want to close the private sales aspect, which is what the gun show “loophole” refers to, you could make a database accessible online linked to NICS. This database would be for the public to search before selling a firearm and contain enough data to provide the seller with a yes or no answer whether it was legal to sell to an individual. If the answer was no and you sell to them anyway you are charged with felony sales of firearms. This is a good start and if you are interested I’d love to continue this discussion. Let me know if you need information, like email, phone, etc. or we can continue in this comment section.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Janek: A simpler way to decide who to vote for starts with eliminating candidates with a ‘D’ after their...
      • WW.: VAN IS A WOOS!!!! FROM A US ARMY RET,, INFANTRY/PARA/SHOOTER AND CIVILIAN COP/NARC
      • Seamus: Dumb idea pal Metadata in your pic very unsafe, why not just buy so cigerettes and put the vote sticker on it...
      • Chuck: Cops are not the military and should not be given this power. All this is coming to is to take away citizens...
      • Chuck: It should be open season on crows 365 days a yr. with no limit. They are very smart and just about impossible...
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • AmmoLand Poll

      Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
      12036128
      12633712