Camillus Choker Kinfe
What we call “political correctness” is the mechanism of re-education and indoctrination being used by the left today. For years, most of us have treated it as comic, or at worst, an annoyance or an inconvenience. I think we need to wake up quickly. By so strictly limiting what we can say and to whom we can say it, we are quickly becoming a government-managed herd of sheep who are not free to think and speak what we believe. I refuse to use the term “African American” or “Native American”. Likewise I will not refer to homosexuals as “gay”. Gender is REAL and truth is truth. Stop using THEIR language!
I’m tired of all the gun talk. And according to this article, 3d printed guns are the least of our worries.
I removed my Facebook account a long time ago. Facebook is SO leftist and PRO-obama that it smells really bad. Nothing pisses me off more than someone else telling me what is right-speech and what is not!
Re: “Obama’s 2008 slogan was “hope and change.” He was vague about the change he had in mind, but we have been learning about it since his election.”, anyone who actually listened to what he said he wanted to do would have, or SHOULD HAVE, realized that he was planning to dismantle our way of life. At the beginning of his first campaign began (has it actually ended?), he said he wanted to fix health care and Social Security. Two weeks later, he added “through re-distribution of wealth”. People were already puckering up to kiss his ass (or suck on something) and this didn’t make a dent on their perception of his ideals and plans for taking over. So many were caught up in the media’s “This is an historical election” hype that it was like a steamroller on the side of a mountain- the momentum was impossible to stop.
As much as Hitler hated Communism and Communists, he sure had some ideas that were in 100% alignment with Stalin’s methods.
Obama has learned well. From now on, I shall call him ‘Grasshopper’.
Quite simply – ANY attempt to change the meaning of “shall not be infringed” is an attempt to “amend” the Constitution by UNLAWFUL MEANS. These attempts to unlawfully amend the Constitution would, in effect, nullify that part of the Constitution and would be a de facto attack on our nation – thus, must be considered an OVERT ACT OF WAR again our nation and the Constitution upon which this nation is founded and grounded.
Anyone who attempts to unlawfully alter our Constitution and our nation MUST BE TREATED AS AN ENEMY ENGAGING IN ACTS OF WAR.