Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists

Quite simply – ANY attempt to change the meaning of “shall not be infringed” is an attempt to “amend” the Constitution by UNLAWFUL MEANS. These attempts to unlawfully amend the Constitution would, in effect, nullify that part of the Constitution and would be a de facto attack on our nation – thus, must be considered an OVERT ACT OF WAR again our nation and the Constitution upon which this nation is founded and grounded.
Anyone who attempts to unlawfully alter our Constitution and our nation MUST BE TREATED AS AN ENEMY ENGAGING IN ACTS OF WAR.

I know if you have it keep it.If the shortage goes on into November than it’s not like the last one when President B O was elected.It didn’t last as long.Though what a way to stop future gun owners from buying firearms.Make it so its extremely hard to find ammo for the firearm you purchase.The DHS doesn’t want civilians armed because the dollar is going to collapse.Mayhem and chaos will happen for the unprepared and the DHS will be the private police force and FEMA CAMPS and FEMA COFFINS will be full.Don’t lose hope.GOD will guide us through just trust in him.

@Mr Stoll: After reading your post, I’ll give you that if you want it purely for an unattended pistol, not too bad an idea. My next question for everyone would be however, do you leave pistols laying around when your not home and just hope that a bullet in the barrel will protect them? I find this irresponsible as they should probably be locked up if unattended, and if so, this bullet would be totally unnecessary.
So the only scenario they are necessary in, in agreement with Mr Stoll, is if you plan to leave your guns laying around unattended with magazines with rounds in them. (I expect screaming at pointing out this scenario’s ridiculousness).