Today is Wednesday, April 16, 2014rss RSS feed

Shooting Wire Editor’s Note: Over the past week, we’ve followed the discussion and controversy surrounding the Wounded Warrior Project following their taking a pass to appear on Tom Gresham’s Gun Talk. Today, Tom Gresham brings us his complete take on the WWP controversy.

Wounded Warrior Project Anti Gun

Wounded Warrior Project In So Many Words Admits it is Anti Gun

Gun Talk Radio

Gun Talk Radio

MANDEVILLE, LA --(Ammoland.com)- Does the Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) have a bias against guns and gun makers?

Two weeks ago that would have sounded crazy, but this week many shooters are convinced that it’s true. Hundreds of hunts and shoots are held as fundraisers for the WWP, and gun companies donate to WWP for its projects. How could it be that this $185 million (2013 projected revenue) outfit could be anti-gun?

It started with a simple invitation — I wanted someone from the Wounded Warrior Project to join me for the Veteran’s Day episode of my national radio show, Tom Gresham’s Gun Talk. I had no idea it would turn into a national dustup which now has the gun rights community in a turmoil — so much so that people are burning their Wounded Warrior Project shirts.

We were disappointed when the Leslie Coleman, PR director for WWP, said they couldn’t come on the show, but that happens. Schedules don’t mesh, things happen, but that’s not uncommon. No big deal. Except that Ms. Coleman said they were declining because we “are related to firearms.”

“While we appreciate the interest in having a WWP representative on your show on Veterans Day we are not able to participate in interviews or activities with media/organizations that are related to firearms,” said Ms. Coleman in her email.

That really rocked us because we knew of all the firearms-related activities used to raise money for WWP. I asked for clarification, and Coleman reconfirmed their position. That Sunday I talked about it on the air and sent out a tweet (@guntalk) with the information. Some doubted that I had reported it correctly, so we posted the entire email exchange on our Facebook page. http://www.facebook.com/notes/gun-talk/wounded-warrior-project-email-exchange/10151354082553313

That lit the fuse, and hundreds (if not thousands) of gun rights supporters contacted WWP for clarification. The response was . . . a bit bland. Mostly it was along the lines of “We support the Second Amendment . . .,” but the WWP web site specifically called out the firearms industry as one it would not “co-brand” with. That is, it would not allow the use of its logo on guns (and it turns out, on knives, either.)

The other industries it won’t co-brand with? Alcohol and sex.

Coleman’s explanation that guns are used in suicides, and suicide is a big issue for returning vets, set off a firestorm of response. WWP quietly started making changes to its web site, removing mention of firearms, or changing it to “weapons.” Online firearms boards documented the changes, posting the before and after. The pressure mounted on WWP.

By midweek, with the help of the Professional Outdoor Media Association, WWP offered to put its CEO, Steve Nardizzi, on Gun Talk Radio to explain what they now called a big misunderstanding that had been blown out of proportion. I welcomed the chance to clear up this mess, which no one wanted. I hoped that Nardizzi would announce a change in the policy.

He didn’t. Once on the air, he said they support the Second Amendment (which really did remind me of when President Obama starts a sentence that way), and that they participate in hunts and shoots as fund raisers. Yes, we knew that. But what of the policy blocking the use of the WWP logo on guns? In fact, the policy prohibits the use of the logo at fundraisers where there is shooting, though that seems to be flexible.

No, he said, they would not “co-brand” with firearms or knives. The return on investment just wasn’t there, he explained. I asked why they would turn down the money from such a program when it didn’t interfere with their larger projects (ketchup, clothing, etc.), and he explained that co-branding requires much internal coordination with lawyers, PR people, and others to manage it, and that I wouldn’t understand it. Hmmm.?

What if we offered to cover all their internal expenses, and then co-brand (use their logo on guns and knives) as a way to contribute to WWP, I asked. Would that be okay? I never got a straight answer to that.

There was much back and forth, with it quickly taking on the feeling of dealing with a politician who has to be there, but who doesn’t really want to answer the questions. To get the full flavor of the interview, you can download it or listen online. http://tinyurl.com/cugy6ft

Nardizzi even went on the offensive, saying he can’t believe we would withhold donations from wounded vets because we don’t get anything out of it (use of the logo). This feigned indignation didn’t fly. I explained that we have many avenues for donating to our veterans – WWP is only one of many – and that just because someone decides not to support a group which he thinks has taken an anti-gun stand doesn’t mean that person isn’t going to continue to contribute — just to other groups.

Having been in the gun rights fight since before the passage of the Gun Control Act of 1968, I’ve seen a lot of changes. For decades I’ve said this fight really is a struggle for public opinion. We have made great strides. Forty years ago a majority of the U.S. population thought that handguns should be severely restricted. That’s not the case now. Through education and exposure the public recognize gun owners as “normal” people just like them. This is huge.

On the other hand, there is a major push to demonize and marginalize gun owners, gun makers, and the shooting sports. It is in this light that I see the WWP policy of prohibiting gun and knife makers from using the WWP logo. What are they telling the world?

Take the longer view. Ebay blocked firearms from being listed. Paypal blocks the use of its service for buying guns. Google blocks guns, dealers and makers from searches in its shopping service. We have reports of banks closing the accounts of gun makers simply on the basis that they won’t do business with the firearms industry.

Each of these is a very public way of saying “We don’t do business with ‘those people’.” Each is a way of saying that reasonable and responsible people should have nothing to do with the firearms business. We are being put into the same box as pornography.

Sure, the Wounded Warrior Project is only too happy to take our money. They “allow” shoots and hunts as fundraisers, but they don’t want their logo associated with us. They are saying in a very public way that they refuse to be associated with us.

Some have suggested that there is pressure from the board, from big donors, or from elsewhere, to prevent the use of the WWP logo on “weapons.” Honestly, I don’t know and don’t care. I just know it to be a continuation of the demonization of firearms, the firearms industry, and those who use guns responsibly.

There is no doubt that the WWP does good work. That’s why I’m left disgusted and sad at this whole affair. But I know that we never win when we shrug and put up with this kind of treatment.

Throughout last week we continued to hear from people and groups which have been rebuffed by WWP because the groups were involved in firearms. One significant donation from a company in our industry was returned because it came though a faith-based foundation.

One element of this rather sad tale has been gratifying. The firearms community responded instantly to this with questions and pressure — so much so that WWP recognized they had to go public to answer the charges. The connectivity of the gun rights movement through the internet made that possible. It has changed the game.

I had hoped that WWP would come to its senses. Once it became clear that the policy would not change, many identified and donated to other groups which help vets, and which are only too happy to be associated with guns, hunting and shooting. Last Sunday I had someone from marineparents.com on the radio show. Each week for the rest of the year, we’ll have various groups which help wounded veterans on the radio to help them get additional exposure.

On Gun Talk Radio I created a “No Shrug” policy. We will always speak up. No longer will we just shrug when faced with a distorted media report about guns. No longer will we just go about our business when a politician makes outrageous claims about gun owners.

No longer will we continue to give money to, or do business with, any outfit which in any way labels us as “undesirables.” To shrug and just go on is to not just accept the demonetization  but it actually agrees with it and supports it.

No longer.

–Tom Gresham

About:In its 18th year of national syndication, Tom Gresham’s Gun Talk Radio airs live on Sundays from 2PM-5PM Eastern, and runs on more than 135 stations, plus on XM (Ch. 165) Satellite Radio. All Gun Talk shows can be downloaded as podcasts at http://www.guntalk.libsyn.com and Apple iTunes, or through one of the available Apps: the Gun Talk iPhone App, the Blackberry Podcast App, and the Gun Talk App for Android on Amazon. The Gun Talk Minute on XM also airs on XM 165, 166, 168 and Fox Sports every day throughout the week. More information is available at www.guntalk.com.

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 61 User comments to “Wounded Warrior Project In Not So Many Words Admits It Is Anti Gun”

    1. Corky Wilson on November 26, 2012 at 11:57 PM said:

      My wife and I will no longer support WWP. WE have enough gun rights enemies without sending them the money to destroy us.

    2. http://www.oscarmike.org 100% Veteran owned and operated and 100% AMERICAN made. Unlike the made in china WWP pin I was given the other day. What a disgrace.

    3. It’s frightful that this administration doesn’t realize that the armed citizen might be the most benificial force against hostile takeover. Case in point is the fear Japan had in invading the USA, because of the fear of US citizens being armed. It might be 70 years later, but there’s still a threat out there.

    4. SurPrise! Imagine that. The gooders behind most charities are liberals. And liberals never allow their programs to overwhelm their anti-gun bias.

    5. I appreciate what Wounded Warrior stands/started for but not how they operate. Did you know they do not and will not help Vietnam Vets? Only vets from the “newer wars. Once again Viet vets are left hanging and don’t count. Did you know that their admin expenses are over $.66 on the dollar in admin costs per Charity Navigator and only a 2 star rating on “Financial”? Not the best use for your contributions

    6. Gilbert Gough on November 27, 2012 at 11:12 AM said:

      I totally appreciate the informative article and will not support Wounded Warriors. However, it would be good to post those organizations that do support wounded warriors and our gun rights. Let us get behind those ororganizations.

    7. Mindy Peterson on November 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM said:

      Will not be supporting that group, ever. I am involved in a fantastic group – Quilts of Valor. They give quilts to wounded servicemen and servicemen (and women) who have been touched by war. I was at an event recently where we awarded 8 quilts to WWII vets. It really touches the hearts of the men and women who receive these quilts. We are always looking for donations for purchasing batting and backings for the quilts. Most of the fabric for the tops is donating by the people piecing the tops. The quilting is donated by longarm quilters. I am the Treasurer for the Kansas City area Quilts of Valor group (KCA QOV Bee). Wish we had the donations that WWP has received over the years! http://www.qovf.org/

    8. Thank you Mindy! I will be looking up Quilts of Valor!

    9. JHolliday on November 27, 2012 at 9:40 PM said:

      As a Disabled Veteran, I would never support a group like WWP that does not want to be connected with people exercising our rights. The operating costs of WWP keeps the Fat Cats full, while they skim from what should go to Vets and deny anything to Vietnam Vets! Who ever heard of such a thing? I’m a current Vet rated at 70%, not a Vietnem Vet, Korea, or WWII, but we are all the Same and WWP is shameful. WWP will take the money but don’t want to connected with “Our Type”, so we don’t need to be connected with Liberal Trash Types like them. There are many Vets groups, both large and small that will take the money and enjoy being connected with “Our Type”, because they are Real People too. Thanks for telling us about this outrage, tell the world, because we were Not born to be passive!

    10. Charles Thoms on November 28, 2012 at 8:29 AM said:

      I have sent 3 e mails requesting to be removed from the Wounded Warrior Project’s monthly contributors. They are all returned “mailbox is full” and the fax line in Florida is always busy. I will continue until I have success.

    11. Stefan LeRoy on November 28, 2012 at 5:28 PM said:

      Hi, I am a double amputee currently still at Walter Reed. Thanks Mindy I have got one of your guys quilts. I think most of you wont support WWp any more but I will. When I arrived in Germany, 5 months ago, I was naked, and mostly out of it. I received a backpack from WWP and Underarmour, in it a bunch of clothes. I have participated in several shoots put on American Legons. I have participated in Team River Runner a program supported by WWP, but one that supports all veterans, post and pre 9/11. Please don’t let this stop you from donating to programs that support wounded vets. Thanks for all you have already done.

    12. Ted Robertson on November 28, 2012 at 5:30 PM said:

      Hey EthanP, this here liberal supports the 2nd amendment and is disappointed with WWP for taking this stance. So you’re mistaken.

    13. Lettie Barnes on November 28, 2012 at 6:49 PM said:

      This “liberal” supports the 2nd amendment too, owns guns, am from a military family and support all veterans but will not support WWP on this. I will make sure to support other groups though.

    14. [...] an organizations right to do as they please and I respect that but I have to agree with Tom Gresham’s article that was posted up on AmmoLand yesterday. I don’t do that “boycott brands” thing unless those brands have [...]

    15. JHolliday on November 28, 2012 at 7:37 PM said:

      A true liberal will defend Anything that obama does, no matter what and that includes most of the media. I know lots of people that lean on the liberal side on some issues, but they vote on the issues, not the party. Those that blindly follow Obama no matter what he does to us, and will continue to support him and others that want to gut the 2nd Amendment, are the liberals that I’m talking about. I vote 2nd Amendment, then other issues.

    16. I hope that country singer who has an ad on FNC supporting WWP gets a whif of this fiasco.

    17. I support the 2nd amendment and am a gun owner but seriously this group helps wounded vets and you guys aren’t going to support them because they don’t like the gun industry? That implies that before you only gave money to them because you assumed they were pro-gun not because you were pro-helping the vets who need it. Y’all are just being petty. Wait let’s all think about this logically for a second of course they don’t support the gun industry they help WOUNDED soldiers shockingly they also don’t support the explosives industry either. You think maybe they do shoots and hunts is because they know the people they help like to do those things kinda like how a vegetarian can throw a BBQ even though they don’t like meat. I hope the next time you see a ex-soldier with a traumatic brain injury or missing his leg you tell him how the group that helped him out is “disgusting” because they don’t want to have their name directly on weapons and don’t want to go on a gun talk show I hope you feel real good about it afterward too.

    18. Arthur Patriart on November 29, 2012 at 8:23 PM said:

      Perhaps the Wounded Warriors should target the US Government who armed them to fight in 2 illegal wars for the zionists. That would make me extremely angry

    19. I am not a liberal nor am I a conservative, but so middle of the road I tend to piss off my liberal friends more than my conservative friends. I own several firearms, have extensive training and work with law enforement often. Obama is no saint and I hold his feet to the fire constantly, as well I also believe that republicans love to talk about the 2nd amendment but completely ignore threats to every other amendment that generally comes from the right more often than not. I am well educated and vote the issues not the party line. I actually think and research issues before I get all uppity about them or swallow talking points. The point is the hypocrisy on both sides is reprehensible.

      Now that being said: SHAME on Ammoland. Just because this group, who helps more warriors than anyone else, does not want to be dragged into he controversy surrounding firearms, or alcohol, or anything else that might turn people like myself away along with my contributions because of extreme or vehement view points, stances or alignments, you label them as anti gun?

      Seems to me you simply wanted them to come to your interview because you were potentially hoping to capitalize on their success and audience to expand your customer base and your own financial gain. Then because they simply denied your request you got your panties in an uproar completely took their reasoning out of context in an attempt to smear their name with the boogieman of the gun grabbers all based on your knee jerk emotionally sensitive ego.

      If you cared at all about wounded vets, you would not switch your stance 180 degrees simply because they don’t want to be associated with your right wing extremist view points that are so evident in your mishandling of this situation. Cant say I blame them, It seems to me that it is Ammoland that has ulterior motives rather than the wounded warriors project. Again. Shame on you for this petty crap. WEAK.

    20. Wounded Warrior Project Admits It Is Anti-Gun – Secrets of the Fed on November 29, 2012 at 8:52 PM said:

      [...] more at Ammoland.com: http://www.ammoland.com/2012/11/26/wounded-warrior-project-is-anti-gun/#ixzz2DfOHmDwB Share Tweet Share (function() { var li = [...]

    21. Dave Collins on November 29, 2012 at 9:48 PM said:

      One simple question: How is a wounded vet (or any disabled person) going to be able to protect themselves and their family without a firearm? I suppose WWP would like the leave them as easy targets for home invasion criminals who coincidentally like to steal pain medications commonly prescribed to wounded vets. Oh right, we have 911 to write up the after-crime report, that will make it all better.

    22. If the wwp is anti gun,I’m anti wwp.

    23. me to-mikey ! spread the word ! i will give to other organizations that support the military !

    24. Michael M. Eisman on December 1, 2012 at 11:47 PM said:

      WWP is correct! Our present attitude towards firearms (particularly handguns and weapons designed to kill multiple people within seconds is both barbaric and uncivilized! It is one of the reasons civilized nations think of us as having a wild West Cowboy mentality.

    25. Folks give the Silver Star Families of America a chance. Their mission is to remember, honor and assist the wounded, ill, injured and dying of our Armed Forces from ALL wars.

      And 97 cents of every dollar goes to where you want it to go.

    26. Ronald G. Thomas on December 3, 2012 at 12:03 PM said:

      The entire point seems to have been overlooked by several of the comments I’ve read. The shooting sports have provided funds, and donations to the WWP. Isn’t it hypocritical of them to deny the use of their logo, or prohibit their support of one of the major supporters of their program??

      I’ve watched numerous hunting programs on television that sponsored wounded warriors on free hunting trips, as well as providing them with free firearms, knives, clothing, etc., yet for all of this generosity and the financial support received the WWP doesn’t want to be associated with these companies and organizations?????????? If the shooting sports are good enough for the WWP to accept their money and donations, then the WWP should be willing to be a partner and promote the companies and organizations in return.

    27. You’d be much better spending your time doing a service for charity than spending your money. Then you’ll know exactly where your efforts have gone.

      What a shame.

    28. I am angry and dissapointed. What a way to use our returning Vets. This is shameful

    29. J Russell on December 11, 2012 at 2:30 PM said:

      I asked that everyone please research this issue fully before you make a decision of support or non-support of a program that supports our Wounded Warriors. Let your heart and common sense guide. Not information provided from one website. Our Wounded Warriors deserve that effort from us. God Bless our fellow servicemen and servicemen, both Active Duty and Veterans

    30. pat mccarthy on December 14, 2012 at 8:05 PM said:

      WWP is a worthy organization helping people who stood up, bled, and sometimes died for our ability to have a second amendment, and fourth, and thirteenth, etc.

      Other organizations do the same thing who don’t marginalize a way of life, and are more efficient with their use of donated funds.

      As such, I will not bash, but nor will I give money to WWP.

      Please remember, that if you are bashing WWP many veterans would take that as bashing veterans. They shouldn’t, but they will, and our veterans deserve our respect at all times.

    31. [...] But would you consider giving the proceeds to a more noble benefit program? The WWP is anti-gun…(Wounded Warrior Project In Not So Many Words Admits It Is Anti Gun) Or would you at least write the organization and ask them if they would like to accept the [...]

    32. I don’t think anyone who heard about this here, will be sending WWP any more donations. Also, they don’t tell you but AARP donates part of anything they get in revenue, to anti-gun groups. I sent them a letter and told them I refused to join a group that did things like that behind people’s back and did not tell them. They said that was their policy and they were not going to change it.

    33. Many groups that you join will not tell you that they donate part of your money to anti-gun agenda. Some of them will say they don’t if you give them the slightest hint that you are pro-gun. The only way you can find out of sure is to pretend you are anit-gun.The ends justifies the means.

    34. I do not understand the sensationalism being voiced here. WWP is simply refusing to get in the middle of a issue that is a no win for any orginization. Supporting the second amendment carries no requirement that you step in and take sides between the extremists on both sides of the issues. I support the second amendment. But I will not lend my time to either side because of the extremists such as those spinning this issue for their own pr.

    35. Ameri_Can on December 27, 2012 at 12:47 PM said:

      If you dont support WWP, you’re not american: FACT

    36. Jim Moran on December 27, 2012 at 1:24 PM said:

      people on this blog should learn English & spelling.YOUR IS NOT EQUAL TO YOU’RE!

    37. Battle Bot Bob on December 30, 2012 at 11:38 AM said:

      I was already disappointed in the amount of money WWP spends on fundraising and staff (Professional fundraisers). Their take on Vietnam Vets and turning away money from co-branding just help crystallize the decision in my mind. OscarMike foundation looks pretty good as well as local groups that already gave up on WWP but not on wounded soldiers. Other suggestions? The suicide issue exists in all phases of life, but guns aren’t the cause or the only means. Providing opportunities to have fun is the best IMO.

    38. [...] “While we appreciate the interest in having a WWP representative on your show on Veterans Day we are not able to participate in interviews or activities with media/organizations that are related to firearms,” said Ms. Coleman in her email. [Ammoland.com] [...]

    39. Friends, PLEASE stop calling them gun rights. Call it what is really is. If you let them steal the language we will continue to lose the hearts.
      It is SELF DEFENSE to which we have a right. If we develop a zapper gun that we can use more effectively than firearms, they will oppose that. TFA, founder Westmoreland Sheriff Brigade.

    40. Friends, PLEASE stop calling them gun rights. Call it what is really is. If you let them steal the language we will continue to lose the hearts.
      It is SELF DEFENSE to which we have a right. If we develop a zapper gun that we can use more effectively than firearms, they will oppose that. TFA, founder Westmoreland Sheriff Brigade.
      PS: correct others please. If others do not love and choose not leave their family defenseless, they have to live with the consequence when trouble come.

    41. Dale Payne on January 19, 2013 at 3:23 AM said:

      I am a Vietnam Vet, although I am not a wounded warrior. It was through the Grace of God that I came through 19 months of hard combat in the Marines unscathed. However my son was not so fortunate, losing part of his leg in Afghanistan to an IED blast. I was proud of his belonging to the WWP, as was he. But now I feel as if both of our faces was slapped. I have been called names and been spit at, but I am man enough to take care of myself. But now they bring dishonor to my son, my only child, bringing their political cowardice against my son. This I will not accept or allow!

    42. WWP will not take funds from religious organizations either. Looking at Donating to the American Legion or VFW as they provide opportunities for youth to participate in competitive shooting events.

    43. Bill Baker on February 7, 2013 at 1:00 PM said:

      I took an active role in the boycott of the Eastern Sports show due to their hypocrisy on this. I previously supported WWP, but now think what happened to the sports show needs to happen to them. Our worst enemies when it comes to gun control aren’t the ones publicly vocalizing the anti-gun position, its the traitors and hypocrites who pretend to support ours while stabbing us in the back.

    44. As a disabled Vietnam Vet, I am sorry I paid for a life membership in support of WWP. You need to copy and paste the following link in your search engine: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=F584p5kJL-U&feature=youtu.be and become informed about what you are really taking a stand against. On top of it all, who in the hell in WWP is leading this outrage. Do any of the Vets remember their oath of office to the constitution? I might have been discharged but I NEVER disavowed my oath to protect the constitution and my country! I am the fourth generation veteran. I served in Vietnam, my dad loaded the bombs for Berlin in WWII, my grandfather was with the Rainbow Division in WWI and died as a result of his service from mustard gas poisoning, and my great-grandfather was a blue-bellied Yankee from the Civil War. Half Navy/half Marine (Seabee)Semper Fi – Always Faithful – Always Loyal! Although I am not a true Marine, I am close to it and I do understand ALWAYS FAITHFUL! If you are taking an anti-gun stand because of suicide, you should know that there are many other ways to commit suicide. If you think disarming the citizens of the United States will prevent suicide, you obviously do not have a solid grasp of what the wounded warriors really need. Disarming the citizens of the United States will only invite our enemies to take away the freedoms that the veterans fought for and were wounded in defense of. You will dishonor every soldier who gave up his life or was wounded in defending our freedom and constitution.

    45. Bill Baker on February 11, 2013 at 7:33 PM said:

      There are other programs that exist to help vets, and while I did respect this organization previously, and could probably find a hundred heart felt videos to make me cry and say how much love they have, if they are going to make a half assed stand against the very rights we joined to support, they can shove it. Just like Obama shielding his gun control campaign with the kids and there letters, don’t accept groups that go half way. That’s one of the biggest problems in America lately, is no one will stand up for their beliefs and stick to their guns. (pun intended) I have said for a long time that I can respect the other side for standing up for what they believe in even if I end up on the losing end of things when SHTF.
      You don’t like my take on WWP, change them, not me. Tell them they should support the rights all the warriors fought to uphold.

    46. Bonnie Sue Gibble on February 12, 2013 at 11:30 AM said:

      L.E.E.K. Mountain Preserve is totally non profit. They are located in Potter County,PA. They bring WOUNDED WARRIORS in to HUNT and enjoy the peacefulness of the area…

    47. was on the bus 2/28/13 to protest the NY SAFE ACT in Albany and learned of this.We’ll finish out the year($19 a month)to WWP but have informed them unless an open apology is issued we will no longer support them.

    48. Perilyn Barton on March 16, 2013 at 11:56 AM said:

      I will no longer support WWP. I don’t support anti gun agendas, no matter how they try to promote what they do.

    49. I just received an envelope and a stamp from WWP. I am returning it to WWP expressing my displeasure at their anti-gun stance. Most of these non-profits just enrich their officers. I would like to know what the principals earn. I agree with Bill Baker – these Warriors were wounded protecting our rights.

    50. My wife and I donated annually to WWP. I’ve been following this since it first broke and after listening to Tom’s interview with Steve the decision was solidified. We will no longer be donating to WWP. We will support our veterans through other channels.

    51. Joseph J. OGERSHOK, Jr. on April 1, 2013 at 4:50 PM said:

      Fundraising policy
      It is the current policy of WWP to charge fundraisers a $100 registration fee and they do not accept donations that are “religious in nature”. When WWP refused a donation from Liberty Baptist Church in Fort Pierce, FL the charity issued this statement to the church leaders: “We must decline the opportunity to be the beneficiary of your event due to our fundraising event criteria, which doesn’t allow community events to be religious in nature,” read an email from the WWP community events team. “Please note your registration fee will be refunded within the next 7-10 business days.” WWP said as a nonpartisan organization they cannot accept event fundraising from companies “in which the product or message is religious in nature.”

      http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/region_st_lucie_county/fort_pierce/wounded-warrior-project-denies-money-donation-from-a-fort-pierce-christian-school

    52. Leo Smith on June 13, 2013 at 2:45 PM said:

      They will not get a dime from me. There are other projects to give money too who do not feel the need to take our 2nd amendment rights and trash them for political purposes.

    53. Red Martian on June 17, 2013 at 5:51 PM said:

      Response to someones’ comment on their facebook page 6/17/13: “Wounded Warrior Project Ralph – Thank you so much for your support in the past. We have always supported the Constitution, including the Second Amendment. We know that hunting and shooting sports can be very therapeutic, and we’re happy to host these types of events that utilize firearms for our warriors around the country. We are also incredibly grateful for the support from individuals, manufacturers, and fundraisers connected with firearms, and have been humbled by the amazing support the community has shown both our warriors and mission. The email chain that has been cited recently was a miscommunication on our part, and we are incredibly sorry for any confusion!”

    54. Fred Parker on June 18, 2013 at 12:22 AM said:

      This is the same group that initially refused to accept donations or allow their name to be used on fund raisers conducted by churches and religious groups. They finally relented after pressure from the net. Now I am not religious but to refuse aid for our wounded warriors from any source is outrageous. I now believe that these people are a liberal group and they will no longer get my support no matter what they do!

    55. Jimmy don\'t play that on June 19, 2013 at 11:46 PM said:

      Steven Nardizzi, Executive Director WWP, drew a salary of $319,692 in FY2011 according to Charity Navigator. One wonders what he will pull down in salary and benefits in FY2014?

    56. [...] Has anyone been following this? Looks like there's been some developments this past week. Wounded Warrior Project In Not So Many Words Admits It Is Anti Gun [...]

    57. [...] But, we remember the WWP's flap over their desire not to be "co-branded" with guns. Wounded Warrior Project In Not So Many Words Admits It Is Anti Gun (for one [...]

    58. I am a disabled Desert Storm Veteran and am terminal. I contacted WWP many years ago and asked for help and was denied because I am not a newer wounded warrior. One organization that I always support is: http://www.avetproject.org Kim and Garren Cone have done retreats for both male and females. They have enlisted the help of Sanctuary Island who does fund raising so we can ride horses. They are so involved in not only Veterans issues, but those that are still on active duty. From sending care packages to welcoming them home. Garren runs a radio program in the Patrick Airforce Base area called Warrior Radio. And I could go on and on. I have been personally helped by them in more ways than I could count.

    59. Fact check on August 8, 2013 at 1:13 PM said:

      Wounded warrior project does not support team river runner anymore, nor do they make donations to MANY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS, I saw a comment above about being flown into Germany and I was in the same boat, at that moment Wwp gave me something that felt a little more homely as I went through various surgeries. However there money is not all where it should be. And every year it’s less and less with smaller or even large non profits and more just anywhere they can put there name that gets there message out. And truly this is America so in the end one person had a brilliant idea, a way to patent an epic name for an organization, and the most powerful image you could mass produce and that is why they do so well. But it’s not only them most of your fun runs that go towards beneficiaries of any sort like cancer make tons of money as well. Kudos to Wwp for succeeding in an economic melt down however eventually people will realize that Super Bowl ads and ketchup bottles aren’t supporting the veterans you swear to, and maybe just maybe you’ll start donating funds back to the little guys instead of lining your pockets

    60. Seanoamericano on August 16, 2013 at 7:58 AM said:

      It may have started out good but was soon over run by professional fundraising liberals who line their own pockets with money. Proof once again that to ruin anything just allow liberals in the door.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • MB: Sure, that’s a nice knife….I like knives. I’d rather see the ivory ON THE ELEPHANT
      • larry gay: lived in Dallas Texas 20 years never got to hog hunt but love watching pigman and love the new show, great...
      • atom570: Police don’t have to register them because they call them “Patrol Rifles”.
      • Brad Armstrong: This article is poorly written at best – high capacity mags are outlawed not mandated to be...
      • Rebel Patriot: From CT. It’s good to see our patriot neighbors telling their Gov to screw off also. How about a...
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Sign up for the Ammoland Daily Digest

    * indicates required
    Daily Digest is a daily recap of Firearms industry news, 2nd Amendment politics , and product articles delivered to the inbox. Stay informed to keep your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
    Yes, I want the Monthly email newsletter subscription to Ammoland so I can get a single newsletter once a month on the hot new products from the Firearms Industry!
    9460560
    9977856