Today is Thursday, April 24, 2014rss RSS feed
Concealed Carry Now

Illinois Seeks Review of Right-to-Carry Case



Charlotte, NC --( On January 8, the State of Illinois petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for a rehearing before the full court in the NRA-backed case Shepard v. Madigan.

A month earlier, on December 11, a three-judge Seventh Circuit panel struck down Illinois’ complete ban on Right-to-Carry outside the home.

Writing the initial decision was Judge Richard Posner, who made clear that in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago, Illinois’ ban was unconstitutional and that “To confine the right to be armed to the home is to divorce the Second Amendment from the right to self-defense described in Heller and McDonald.” The panel ruled that Illinois had 180 days to enact a suitable Right-to-Carry law, and the filing of the petition doesn’t stop the clock on that deadline.

In the petition for rehearing, Illinois claims that the Shepard decision contradicts two other federal appeals court decisions, Kachalsky v. County of Westchester in the Second Circuitand United States v. Masciandaro in the Fourth Circuit, both of which interpreted the right to self-defense in Heller more narrowly, upholding restrictions on carrying firearms outside the home. Illinois also took issue with the panel’s holding that the state failed to show empirical evidence that the carry ban “was vital to public safety.”

Joining Illinois was the Brady Center, which filed a “friend of the court” brief supporting the state. In line with the group’s anti-self-defense mission, the brief assailed Judge Posner’s decision as “broad and unmeasured.” The brief goes on to argue against aninterpretation of the Second Amendment that would include self-defense outside the home, and asks the court to consider empirical public safety data in its analysis of the law’s legitimacy. Presumably that means Brady-approved firearm studies.

NRA-ILA will continue to litigate this case aggressively in order to bring Illinois into line with the 49 states that have some legal mechanism for exercising the right to carry outside the home.
Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit:

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 2 User comments to “Illinois Seeks Review of Right-to-Carry Case”

    1. What I’d like to know is how does one get from Columbia, Missouri, to Terre Haute, Indiana, and still stay with in the guarantees under the Second Amendment? If Illinois does not want to allow it’s ‘citizens’ the Right to protect themselves, that’s something those “Citizens” need to take up with the State of Illinois. But, as one of the States Several, who signed on to the Constitution, fully accepting the terms therein, the State of Illinois MUST RESPECT THE LAWFUL ACTIVITIES OF CITIZENS OF THE OTHER STATES WITHIN THE UNION. Otherwise, it seems to me, that the State of Illinois is in OPEN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION FOR THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    2. Always remember, it’s not the people of Illinois that wants gun bans and no Conceal Carry for the citizens, it the State Legislatures, the Governor, and the Chicago Bureaucrats that wants to Control the citizens of Illinois and not allow their Freedoms and Rights to keep and bare arms and it is the Democratic leadership controlled by Unions in Illinois that Controls the Democrats.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • TSgt B: The “Executive Director” of the Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence admitted during a televised...
      • Janek: This is just another way that California government interferes in lawful commerce to achieve it’s goals.
      • D. Murphy: democraps at work again, this is what they have planed for the whole country.
      • Janek: Do you ever wonder why the anti-gun cabal mostly consists of Democrats? Just asking?
      • Not An Idiot: You must think we are complete idiots. There is not an honest argument in this entire diatribe....
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Sign up for the Ammoland Daily Digest

    * indicates required
    Daily Digest is a daily recap of Firearms industry news, 2nd Amendment politics , and product articles delivered to the inbox. Stay informed to keep your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
    Yes, I want the Monthly email newsletter subscription to Ammoland so I can get a single newsletter once a month on the hot new products from the Firearms Industry!