Today is Tuesday, October 21, 2014rss RSS feed
Colorado Capitol Building

Colorado Standing On The Slippery Slop of Civil Rights Killing Gun Control

By Andy Lightbody

Andy Lightbody

Andy Lightbody

Grand Junction, Co. --(Ammoland.com)- Regardless of where you stand on new gun control regulations, Colorado lawmakers have without question, been asked by the Obama administration to “fall on their swords.”

With four very controversial gun control bills now headed for the State Senate, Colorado is the designated western state to use as a model other states to emulate.

If lawmakers can pass draconian bills in a state like Colorado, it will definitely have an effect on other states beyond those “progressive thinkers” in California, New Jersey, and New York.

The paramount problem is, none of these gun control regulations are going to do anything to curtail crime, stop a psycho from a mass slaughter, prevent a murder or do anything else but bolster the Administration’s war on legal gun owners and firearms possession.

With thousands of gun laws already on the books —Federal, State and local— it always has been and will be a question about how effectively are those laws being used and enforced?

Firearms are inanimate objects, with no malicious intent. It’s the criminal/psycho behind any object that perpetrates a violent act. McVeigh used explosives in the OKC bombing. The 9/11 hijackers used box cutters. The 26,146 adults and juveniles arrested for DUIs (2011) that resulted in 185 fatalities, used a vehicle. The psycho at the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, used stolen firearms.

Blaming firearms as the core of evil is like blaming stairs as the cause for someone falling down. It simply does not wash.

Banning firearm magazines that can hold more than 15-rounds isn’t based on any scientific data about crime, murders or shootings. In fact, of the 7,400 illegal firearms confiscated in Chicago last year, only 4% could be categorized as the infamous “assault-type” guns. Of those 300 firearms, some of them were .22 rifles and many even had 5-7 shot magazines.

In addition, the idea that universal background checks will deter a criminal or a psycho is extremely weak. At present, there is no way to ensure that a mentally ill individual will be stopped from purchasing a firearm, even with a background check. Federal firearm purchase forms already question an individual’s mental health. Unfortunately, Colorado, like most other states have made it nearly impossible to secure any sort of mental health records and identify those who could put themselves or others at risk.

And paying for these background checks? Many liken it to the old days where some had to pay in order to exercise their right to vote. Call it a tax, or call it a fee, somehow if an individual doesn’t have to pay to exercise their right to vote, they shouldn’t have to pay to exercise their right to the 2nd Amendment.

Finally the idea that we are once again reinforcing Gun Free Zones on our campuses, is like hanging a “welcome criminals here,” banner. Gun Free Zones in the past have only announced that there is no one here that is armed and capable of stopping a madman. The 2012 case initiated here in Colorado by Students For Concealed Carry and brought before the Colorado Supreme Court, affirmed that students and faculty with a valid Concealed Carry Permit, were allowed that right for self-protection.

Now, that right is also being challenged, with Colorado State lawmakers such as state representative Joe Salazar (D) telling female students they are better protected against assault/rape by having on campus safe zones, emergency call boxes and rape whistles, rather than having a firearm, a permit and knowing how to use it.

Or the infinite wisdom of CU in Colorado Springs telling women in a campus sponsored in-class training called Rape Aggression Defense (RAD), and as part of their “10 points of last resort,” that they should tell their attacker that they “have a disease or are menstruating.” Or that “vomiting or urinating may also convince the attacker to leave you alone.”

These four bills— HB13-1224, HB13-1226, HB13-1228, and HB13-1229 are now headed to the State Senate and if passed, will likely be signed into law by Governor Hickenlooper. State Senator Gail Schwartz has yet to take a public position on these bills. E-mail and calls to the Senator’s office have not been responded to.

With the passage of these bills, not only will Colorado become the “western state poster child” for such laws on a national level, it will also punish the law-abiding Colorado firearm’s owner for crimes and violence that he or she will likely never commit. And opening the door to additional bans—firearm types, accessories, ammunition—while further assaulting the 2nd Amendment.

All this, while doing nothing to use all the existing laws that are on the books, against the criminal or the crazy.

(Andy Lightbody is an outdoor writer and broadcaster, and owns Rocky Mountain Television/Productions. He is the former Senior Editor at Petersen’s Hunting Magazine, and Editor of the Outdoor Book Division for Guns & Ammo Publications. He is a Field Editor for Sportsman’s News Magazine; Contributor for AmmoLand.com, Contributor for the OutdoorHub.com and other websites.

  • 7 User comments to “Colorado Standing On The Slippery Slop of Civil Rights Killing Gun Control”

    1. David Kunau on February 22, 2013 at 3:07 AM said:

      My wife and I bought what was going to be our retirement house in Colorado. If these strict gun regulations go thru we will look for a state more inviting to our interests and 2nd amendment rights.
      Before Clorado gets gun owners upset, they better think of the repercussion to the states economy when masses of firearm owners show Colorado that there are other states to hunt in that will show legal gun owners respect for their 2nd amendment rights.
      From the conversations that I have heard, I would bet Colorado will lose at least 60% of the regular big game hunters.
      Colorado better let Idaho, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona, and Wyoming try to fix the problems associated to Chicago and the state of Illionise and the city and state New York.

    2. Fu#kObama on February 22, 2013 at 10:12 PM said:

      During the 90’s liberals from California flocked to Colorado to flee the violence caused by their policies. These policies were straight hard core commie. They are now coming to fruition.

      The open borders crowd embraced and offered sanctuary to violent Hispanic criminals, as they did in California, violent gun crime became remnant. Of course liberals blame guns, they have to. A liberal can never admit their policy’s are the cause, or the public trough money would dry up.

      At one time, Colorado was a great place to work and live.

    3. Reason and logic have nothing to do with it. None of the so called violence prevention bills do anything about the problem. Once again treated the symptoms and results without treating the root of the problem.[feel good laws] Okay, blame the teachers. Didn’t teach problem solving skills. Blame the leftists and liberals – they are just plain nuts.

    4. DaveGinOly on February 23, 2013 at 1:29 AM said:

      We usually look to the language of the Constitution to support our position and to assail bad law. But there are also priniciples that can help determine the constitutionality of legislation. One of those principles is “Is the legislation arbitrary?” Because none of the legislation is actually capable of doing what the promoters say it will do (reduce violence and crime), they’re arguably arbitrary. Restrictions on magazine capacity are blatantly, inarguably arbitrary – different states have proposed or approved of limits of 7, 10, and 15 rounds – they’re picking numbers at random, and, in doing so, proving the point.

    5. As a resident of Colorado, I move that we change it’s nickname from the Centennial State to the Chicken Little State.
      My response to these four bills is simple.. “I WILL NOT COMPLY.”

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Janek: Is he a registered Democrat?
      • Phil: And what do you think a hunter will grab first?
      • RDNK: The good people in NY who cherish their 2A rights/freedoms better listen up,…GET THE HELL OUT NOW ! Due...
      • Chris: Very well said. I agree completely.
      • BUDDY HOWTON: Please Have Some One Email Me I Want Some 303 Ammo,Beside That All Is Fine Thanks Buddy In Jacksonville...
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Win a Russian Sniper Rifle From AimSurplus.com

    Subscribe and receive our emails , the drawing will be November 20 , 2014 maybe you will be the lucky shooter receiving a Russian 1891/30 PU 7.62x54R Mosin Nagant Sniper Rifle and a can of Ammunition. For more information visit the AimSurplus Sniper Rifle Promotion Page.
    Monthly email subscription from Ammoland
    14409032
    15009280