Comments on: High Capacity Gun Magazine are Standard – Get the Truth, Read Facts

By: D. Murphy

D. Murphy — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:44:50 +0000

In my IDPA club we call the magazines, Standard Capacity. I shoot a G17 wiht a 17 round capacity, I can only load 10 rounds for IDPA (11 for the first mag, chambering 1). I carry a G26 and/or XD Sub compact, both designed for 10 rounds. I do not want some government telling me what I can and cannot have, especially some democrat who does not know a magazine from a clip!!

By: MARVIN WILSON

MARVIN WILSON — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:14:50 +0000

THERE IS NO MAGAZINE OR CLIP CAPACITY IN THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND THE GOVERNMENT CAN’T USURP THE 2ND AMENDMENT ON GUNS AND AMMOMUNITION OR ON THE CAPACITY THAT ANY AND EACH GUN HOLDS AT ANY ONE TIME THAT IT IS LOADED, NOTHING BASED ON FACT EXCEPT FOR SOME DERANGED SHOOTERS THAT SHOULDN’T HAVE HAD ANY GUN AT ALL AS THEY WERE NOT A SFE PERSON TO HAVE ONE, BUT WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL HERE ON THIS POINT OF MENTAL DEFIENCY TO HAVE A GUN AS THE GOVERNMENT WILL TRY TO TAKE THAT OVER TOO AND IT COULD MEAN THAT EVERY BODY COULD BE STOPPED FROM HAVING A WEAPON. A FIRE WALL HAS TO BE BUILT INTO THIS MENTAL GUN EXAM BY A DOCTOR OR THE GOVERNMENT IF A PERSON SHOWS SIGNS OF VIOLENCE OR BEHAVIOR THAT WOULD KEEP THEM FROM HAVING A GUN, I THINK THE “NRA” AND OTHER GUN RIGHTS ADVOCATES SHOULD BE IN ON THE PERSON’S TEST OR MENTAL CAPACITY WHEN THE GOVERNMENT WANTS TO BAR THE CITIZENS FROM AQUIRING A GUN OF THEIR CHOICE AND THE NUMBER OF GUNS AND AMMO ETC. WE CANNOT LEAVE THIS RIGHT UP TO POLITITIONS AND SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO DISARM THE WHOLE PUBLIC AT LARGE. WE THE PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE THE SAY WHEN A PERSON IS STOPPED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO OWN A FIRE ARM TO SEE IF THE SAID PERSON IS REALLY NOT CAPABLE OF OWNING ONE.

By: Johnny Nightrider

Johnny Nightrider — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 09:52:41 +0000

You should get the magazine or magazines the manufacturer built in the design of the firearm.A Glock 19 was designed with a 15 round magazine.You live in California you get 10 round magazines.A S&W M&P .45 was designed with a ten round magazine.Same thing you get 10 round mags in California.Glock 21 designed with a 13 round mag.In California 10 round mags you get.Some handguns and rifles we’re designed with 30 round magazines.Like the Kel-Tec PMR30 .22 magnum handgun.You can’t buy it in California because there isn’t a 10 round magazine made for it.Same with certain rifles.Than you have some 1911′s that have 7 round,8 round,or 10 round magazines.All cool in California.I just think you should get the magazine the handgun or rifle was designed with.If its 7 rounds,10 rounds,15 rounds,17rounds,20 rounds or 30 rounds.

By: DaveGinOly

DaveGinOly — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 06:46:36 +0000

Because the Second Amendment protects the right to self-defense, a magazine limit is a direct attack on this right, as a defensive use of a firearm could be unsuccessful if the defender were arbitrarily limited in the number of rounds of ammunition available. You just said the magic woid - arbitrary! In order to pass constitutional muster, legislation must not be arbitrary. Because various states have proposed or enacted bans on magazines with capacities of 7, 10, 15, and 20 rounds, they can't all be "correct," i.e. only one of them (at most) can be non-arbitrary and rationally based. The rest must be arbitrary. But because none of them are based on any valid science or public safety standard, they are all arguably arbitrary, and thus unconstitutional!