Comments on: Troublesome Court Ruling Against Gun Owners Should Not Be Legal Precedent

By: dan

dan — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 01:45:14 +0000

soon all gun laws will not matter…you will be deemed a criminal if you do not comply with any law…so anyone holding to the Constitution and Gods law will be a criminal…so be it…many have died for this country and its promise of freedom….that promise has now been broken what with the many anti gun laws being brought forth by freedom haters….those that have died will now have to be avenged for their sacrifice will not have been in vain…Semper Fi

By: Sparafucile

Sparafucile — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:37:31 +0000

This ruling may be even more insidious than it appears.

Suppose you possess two rifles — each independently CA-legal. But if you took the (innocuous) parts from one and attached them to the other — like the pistol grip, flash suppressor, bayonet mount, and collapsible stock from one, and attached them to the other with the detachable magazine, then you COULD make what CA law describes as an “assault weapon”.

Now, you could be convicted of various crimes for possessing all the parts for an “assault weapon” — even if they’re currently assembled into three separate and legal rifles.

By: Mm

Mm — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:42:13 +0000

Thomson center arms v.U.S. capability does not prove intent federal court ruled in favor of TC ……

By: jerrys kidds

jerrys kidds — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:52:30 +0000

My God I live here in San Diego Are there anyone like myself here that loves guns, hunting and self defense???? I got to get the H#ll out of here!!