Today is Monday, April 21, 2014rss RSS feed
Gun Rights Policies with John Snyder

Gun Rights Policies with John Snyder

Titusville, FL -The latest wacko gun-grabbing proposal calls for a special tax on legal sales of firearms by dealers and manufacturers to pay for costs created by the illegal use of firearms,” gun rights expert John M. Snyder noted here today. “Of course the tax would be passed on to legitimate purchasers.”

The proposal came in a New York Times article, “Make Gun Companies Pay Blood Money,” by law professors Lucinda M. Finley and John G. Culhane.

Finley and Culhane want the tax on every firearm sold to go into a “victims of gun violence” fund so that those “who derive a benefit from guns – for hunting, target practice, self-defense or simply collecting” would be forced to pay for the “social costs of their choice.”

Snyder said, “The gun grabbers really are going over the edge. They’re probably frustrated with their inability thus far to force the people through Congress to buy into various gun control schemes. Now they’re trying to recast gun control as a tax. They want legislatures to force law-abiding gun owners to shoulder burdens created by the criminal use of firearms by criminals.

“Hopefully people won’t buy into such inanity.”

As Kimberley A. Strassel wrote in The Wall Street Journal, Finley and Culhane “expressly advocate tying the level of this tax to gun violence – ‘rising when injuries and death increase, and falling when they decrease.’ The clear goal would be to force, through ‘economic pressure,’ gun manufacturers to curtail the sale of certain ‘lethal guns’ or to unilaterally equip their products with ‘safer gun technologies.’

Put another way, those Americans who responsibly exercise one of their most basic freedoms – in this case, the Second Amendment – would be forced to compensate the victims of gun criminals. Go figure.”

Snyder added, “Well-meaning but naïve do-gooders may run the risk of falling for this nonsense. Catholic bishops who get sucked into the ranks of gun controllers may wish to know who some of their political bedfellows are. Finley has represented New York abortion clinics before the U.S. Supreme Court and Culhane has written in support of same sex marriage in legal journals.

“American freedom lovers may recognize that the right to keep and bear arms is the linchpin of our liberty and reject the Finley-Culhane call for this ridiculous tax.”
John M. Snyder
Telum Associates, LLC
Arlington, VA

About John Snyder:
Named the Gun Dean by Human Events, “the senior rights activist in Washington” by Shotgun News, a “champion of the right to self-defense” by The Washington Times, and “dean of gun lobbyists” by The Washington Post and The New York Times, John M. Snyder has spent 45 years as a proponent of the individual Second Amendment civil right to keep and bear arms as a National Rifle Association editor, public affairs director of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, treasurer of the Second Amendment Foundation, and founder of

A former Jesuit seminarian, Snyder is founder/manager of Telum Associates, LL.C., founder/chairman of the St. Gabriel Possenti Society, Inc., a director of Council for America, and serves on the boards of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and the American Federation of Police & Concerned Citizens. He is also the author of the book Gun Saint. Visit:

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 4 User comments to “Gun Law Expert Hits Proposal for Special Firearms Sales Tax”

    1. johnny on June 27, 2013 at 4:42 PM said:

      How about a tax on every person who owns a car to pay for drunk drivers who hurt people in an accident.

    2. john carr on June 28, 2013 at 8:11 AM said:

      Not only cars. How about knives, ball bats, rocks etc.

    3. VT Patriot on June 28, 2013 at 10:42 AM said:

      I think we should start a tax on all women with kids so a fund could be started to support abortions. And a tax on married heterosexual—- and on and on…

    4. Biscut on June 28, 2013 at 5:33 PM said:

      What part of “shall not be infringed” does an extra tax for useage sit on well? If they can’t keep us from having guns just tax them beyond the ability of most of us to use them and the effect is — gun contol.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Gregory Smith: They’re very nice, I own a Beretta Nano in green, so I can appreciate those wild colors. The...
      • Ryan: @CT, I disagree, Ammoland already has tons of content related to guns, it must be 99% of what they publish. I...
      • Todd Paris: You need to consult with a attorney qualified in federal criminal law. I enjoy your site and am a GOP ,...
      • jeff martin: First of all you don’t earn your way into Heaven!! As long as we keep pushing the truth for all to...
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Sign up for the Ammoland Daily Digest

    * indicates required
    Daily Digest is a daily recap of Firearms industry news, 2nd Amendment politics , and product articles delivered to the inbox. Stay informed to keep your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
    Yes, I want the Monthly email newsletter subscription to Ammoland so I can get a single newsletter once a month on the hot new products from the Firearms Industry!