Today is Saturday, July 26, 2014rss RSS feed
Second Amendment Foundation

Second Amendment Foundation

BELLEVUE, WA --(Ammoland.com)- The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Arkansas on behalf of a legal resident alien, alleging that his right to keep and bear arms is being violated by a state law that prevents him from obtaining a concealed carry license.

The lawsuit, on behalf of Martin Pot (pronounced Poht), a citizen of the Netherlands, challenges the Arkansas statute because it “completely prohibits resident legal aliens from the concealed carry of guns, in public, for the purpose of self-defense. Named as a defendant in the case is Colonel Stan Witt, director of the Arkansas State Police.

“Mr. Pot is a law-abiding resident of Eureka Springs, and has been so since 1986,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “He is self-employed and is a productive member of the community, with an American-born wife and family. He came here almost 30 years ago, met and married his wife, and has many solid connections in his community.”

SAF and Mr. Pot are represented by attorney David Sigale of Glen Ellyn, Illinois.

“When I first spoke with Mr. Pot over the telephone, I was alarmed at the prospect of his being denied a fundamental constitutional civil right because of the discriminatory citizenship requirement that was added to the law,” said SAF general counsel Miko Tempski. “He previously had a license, but under the revised statute, the state will not renew it.”

Gottlieb noted that Pot is allowed to possess a firearm in Arkansas only in his home, on his property or – under certain circumstances – while on a “journey.” However, state law prohibits him from obtaining a concealed carry permit because he is not a citizen.

“This is not the first time we have taken an action on behalf of a resident alien,” Gottlieb said, “and we are very confident that this will be a successful case. We have faced similar successful challenges in Washington, New Mexico, Massachusetts and Nebraska.”

SAF is seeking a declaration from the court that the citizenship requirement contained in Arkansas law is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. In addition to the landmark McDonald v. Chicago Supreme Court Case, SAF has previously funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, CT; New Orleans; Chicago and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners, a lawsuit against the cities suing gun makers and numerous amicus briefs holding the Second Amendment as an individual right.

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 6 User comments to “Second Amendment Foundation Suit Alleges Civil Rights Deprivation Under Color Of Law In Arkansas”

    1. So why doesn’t he become a legal US citizen?

    2. Marc Brewer on November 6, 2013 at 10:04 AM said:

      My thoughts too Tom. I am a little irritated by people who are NOT citizens, thinking they should be treated like one. Great, you’ve been here LEGALLY for 30 years….welcome. but swear allegiance to THIS country, BECOME a legal citizen, THEN you are entitled…….

    3. Why he doesn’t become a citizen is a separate issue from whether or not he is entitled to the rights enumerated in the Constitution. Those rights are not contingent upon being a citizen of the United States.

    4. Charles Michel on November 6, 2013 at 8:21 PM said:

      How about using some of the funds to get nj people some rights ?
      Aren’t we deserving of the rights ?
      I am tired of New Jersey but I really don’t like to run from a fight .

    5. Drew I don’t know the version of the constitution you have read but the rights mentioned in the bill of rights are for legal AMERICANS. If you are not a citizen of the untied states the constitution and the bill of rights do NOT apply to you.

    6. SKEPTICAL OBSERVER on November 8, 2013 at 1:36 PM said:

      @Drew,
      That’s the interpretation that the Obamanation uses to extend Constitutional Rights to terrorists on the battlefield and elsewhere!!

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • sidney crews: can someone please tell me, why are these anti-gun woman so ugly, there must be a reason Semper Fi my...
      • Eric: Ban lead , then they claim solids as armor piercing with no ballistic testing. Ban bullets by caliber because...
      • Eric: Sad when you need a permit for a Constitutional right. No permit , open or concealed carry does work , but...
      • Eric Mills: We ALL have a responsibility to protect the environment, not just the sporting community, and each of us...
      • Brian: I live in Ca. The gun restrictions are ridiculous. But the weather is Great.
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Win a Daniel Defense DDM4v9 Rifle

    Subscribe and receive our emails , the drawing will be August 15, 2014 maybe you will be the lucky shooter receiving a Daniel Defense DDM4v9 Rifle. For more information visit the Daniel Defense promotional page.
    Monthly email subscription from Ammoland
    13501248
    14058664