Today is Thursday, August 28, 2014rss RSS feed
Second Amendment Foundation

Second Amendment Foundation

BELLEVUE, WA --(Ammoland.com)- The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Arkansas on behalf of a legal resident alien, alleging that his right to keep and bear arms is being violated by a state law that prevents him from obtaining a concealed carry license.

The lawsuit, on behalf of Martin Pot (pronounced Poht), a citizen of the Netherlands, challenges the Arkansas statute because it “completely prohibits resident legal aliens from the concealed carry of guns, in public, for the purpose of self-defense. Named as a defendant in the case is Colonel Stan Witt, director of the Arkansas State Police.

“Mr. Pot is a law-abiding resident of Eureka Springs, and has been so since 1986,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “He is self-employed and is a productive member of the community, with an American-born wife and family. He came here almost 30 years ago, met and married his wife, and has many solid connections in his community.”

SAF and Mr. Pot are represented by attorney David Sigale of Glen Ellyn, Illinois.

“When I first spoke with Mr. Pot over the telephone, I was alarmed at the prospect of his being denied a fundamental constitutional civil right because of the discriminatory citizenship requirement that was added to the law,” said SAF general counsel Miko Tempski. “He previously had a license, but under the revised statute, the state will not renew it.”

Gottlieb noted that Pot is allowed to possess a firearm in Arkansas only in his home, on his property or – under certain circumstances – while on a “journey.” However, state law prohibits him from obtaining a concealed carry permit because he is not a citizen.

“This is not the first time we have taken an action on behalf of a resident alien,” Gottlieb said, “and we are very confident that this will be a successful case. We have faced similar successful challenges in Washington, New Mexico, Massachusetts and Nebraska.”

SAF is seeking a declaration from the court that the citizenship requirement contained in Arkansas law is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. In addition to the landmark McDonald v. Chicago Supreme Court Case, SAF has previously funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, CT; New Orleans; Chicago and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners, a lawsuit against the cities suing gun makers and numerous amicus briefs holding the Second Amendment as an individual right.

  • 6 User comments to “Second Amendment Foundation Suit Alleges Civil Rights Deprivation Under Color Of Law In Arkansas”

    1. So why doesn’t he become a legal US citizen?

    2. Marc Brewer on November 6, 2013 at 10:04 AM said:

      My thoughts too Tom. I am a little irritated by people who are NOT citizens, thinking they should be treated like one. Great, you’ve been here LEGALLY for 30 years….welcome. but swear allegiance to THIS country, BECOME a legal citizen, THEN you are entitled…….

    3. Why he doesn’t become a citizen is a separate issue from whether or not he is entitled to the rights enumerated in the Constitution. Those rights are not contingent upon being a citizen of the United States.

    4. Charles Michel on November 6, 2013 at 8:21 PM said:

      How about using some of the funds to get nj people some rights ?
      Aren’t we deserving of the rights ?
      I am tired of New Jersey but I really don’t like to run from a fight .

    5. Drew I don’t know the version of the constitution you have read but the rights mentioned in the bill of rights are for legal AMERICANS. If you are not a citizen of the untied states the constitution and the bill of rights do NOT apply to you.

    6. SKEPTICAL OBSERVER on November 8, 2013 at 1:36 PM said:

      @Drew,
      That’s the interpretation that the Obamanation uses to extend Constitutional Rights to terrorists on the battlefield and elsewhere!!

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Jay Hanig: What is the world coming to when a bad guy can survive four .38s to the chest? It’s not like the...
      • The Rifleman: William. with all due respect, I think maybe you missed my point regarding “checking out”....
      • Eric: Crime didnt pay. Good guy with a gun won , where’s the media.
      • William: Major Van Harl – Someone coming at you with a knife (deadly force) that is a very good reason to...
      • William: JCH, LEOs are trained to defend by many methods; verbally, physically, and use of deadly force. Your comment...
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • AmmoLand Poll

      Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
      12069944
      12670328