Today is Tuesday, September 02, 2014rss RSS feed

By Dean Weingarten

Nobel Prize

Education of a Nobel Laureate on Gun Control

Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten

Arizona - -(Ammoland.com)-  In the early 1980′s, I found myself working on a graduate degree at the University of Wisconsin.

The University had a Nobel laureate among the faculty, Dr. Howard Temin.   I had already made the decision to fight for the second amendment.  Although I thought the cause was lost, I could not in good conscience  give up.

I could not live with myself if I did not do what I could to preserve the Constitution and the rule of law.  I had just finished a tour of duty,   I had taken an oath, and I had meant it.

It was a vastly different time.   Florida had not passed concealed carry.   The demographics looked bad.   The number of hunters was falling, and it was hard to see how we could energize sufficient second amendment supporters without a new generation of hunters.   There was no Internet.   There was no conservative talk radio.  I took the formation of CNN as a hopeful sign that we might get some diversity in the media.   Personal computers were just starting.  I had a friend who ran an IBM 360 in his basement as his PC.  I learned to program on cardboard punch cards.

One day, reading the local paper, I saw a letter to the editor from Dr. Temin.   He was pushing for more infringements on the second amendment, and his assumptions were simply wrong, so  I decided to see if I could enlighten him.  

Being able to place, “Nobel laureate” at the end of a letter to the editor is a powerful argument from authority, and I wanted to stop his misinformed but politically correct attacks.

For those of you who do not know, Madison, Wisconsin is sometimes known as Berkley, Midwest.  Progressive politics is endemic to the academic environment.  I suspected that the Nobel Prize winner had simply inhaled his opinions about guns and gun legislation with the overall political attitude on campus.  I have found that it is almost never worthwhile to disrespect the opposition, especially when you know little about them.   I respectfully telephoned Dr. Temin and questioned him about his letter to the editor.   I had a copy of Don Kates’ book, “Restricting Handguns: The Liberal Skeptics Speak Out“.   It had only been out for a couple of years, and it was full of powerful and nuanced articles that tore  apart the progressive premises for “gun control”, which at the time, meant only “handgun control”.

In my short conversation with the Nobel laureate, I found that he had done no research on the subject, and asked if he would be willing to look at a book about it that I could lend him.  He said yes.  I met him when I delivered the book.  You could see the intensity in the man;  he was focused, focused like an Olympic athlete.  His life was organized around his research, his time was extremely valuable, he spent his life on what he believed to be important.  I have often wondered if someone else had asked him to write the letter to the editor.

Two weeks later, I asked if he had finished the book.   He said that I could pick it up.   I did so, and when I was at his office, I asked him if he had read it.   He said that he had skimmed through it.  I asked him if he had learned anything.

He said “I learned not to write about things that I do not know anything about.”  I never saw another letter to the editor from him.

I learned a few things from this experience.  First, that much of our opposition is operating from pure ignorance.   Everyone is ignorant.   “We are all just ignorant about different things”, as Mark Twain once said.  The second was a reinforcement that it pays to respect someone who disagrees with you.  Maybe they do not deserve your respect, but that is not an easy or quick thing to establish.  It also pays to try to get inside of your opposition’s head.  I knew that the Nobel laureate was a scientist, a good one.  What real scientist can resist looking at data that he has not seen?  I had not read Dale Carnegie yet, but it only made sense to make Dr. Temin’s assimilation of information easy and non-confrontational.

While this was not a momentous victory in the battle to restore the second amendment, it was a victory.   No more letters to the editor appeared pushing for more infringements with “Nobel laureate” at the end.  It is of such small events that real victories are made.

Don Kates deserves a great deal of credit.  He is still contributing valuable research.     His book was a turning point, developing serious arguments in a format that academics could easily understand and accept.   He is the first that I know of who started to recruit and encourage people to write academic articles for law journals, documenting the history of the second amendment, and destroying the “progressive” mythology that had been built about it since 1905.

©2013 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch

About Dean Weingarten;
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973.  He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • 3 User comments to “Education of a Nobel Laureate on Gun Control”

    1. I had a similar experience while attending criminal justice classes at Northern Michigan University while stationed at K. I. Sawyer AFB in the 80s.

      I enrolled in a course titled “Guns in American Society”. During the 1st session, the professor started out by telling he had never owned a gun, never held a gun, never shot a gun, didn’t believe people should have guns, and that we would now proceed to talk about guns.

      I immediately challenged by inviting him to a session at the range, explaining to him that by doing so, after holding and shooting a gun, he would be a bit more qualified to talk about the subject.

      Initially, he was very much against the idea. However, as I am one that is not easily intimidated, I left him nowhere to go but to accept my offer.

      Long story short: by the end of the semester, he was asking advice on what type of handgun would be best for home defense. I advised him that since he was quite inexperienced, he was welcome to try several of mine, and he wound up purchasing a Smith & Wesson Model 19 4″ .357 magnum.

      If we don’t try, we’ll never know how it turns out.

    2. Two things. It is unfortunate that the author couldn’t convince the Nobel Laureate to write in support of our natural right of self defense and, far too many have a negative knee jerk reaction to the term ignorant. It does not infer a lack of intelligence but a lack of information. The latter can be cured, the former……..not so much.

    3. I recently met a middle school teacher who was opposed to school staff carrying at work. I asked her if she preferred being victimized to possibly being able to protect students and others. After some thought and conversation, she is now looking forward to getting her concealed carry permit and plans to carry at school. (Legal here in UT w/ permit.) At least some of the folks are waking up…

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Mike11C: EAT THAT, Shannon Watts!!!
      • Janek: Resisting the onslaught of ‘Progressive’ policies via ‘boycotts’ limits your freedom...
      • Scott Weir: A 200″+ or anything close would go great on my wall
      • james bollerud: Does Secretary Salatazar have an office or a contact person working in Anchorage, Alaska?
      • Charles K. Bent JR.: VOTE HIM OUT!
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • AmmoLand Poll

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    13723208
    14311840