Today is Tuesday, July 29, 2014rss RSS feed

By Alan Caruba

Nuclear Bomb Blast

Nuclear Bomb Blast

Alan Caruba

Column by Alan Caruba

New Jersey --(Ammoland.com)- I suppose that throughout history men and women have asked themselves if they were living through either the worst or best of times.

The times between wars are most surely the best of times and the times leading up to and during a war qualify as the worst. They are, however, rather quickly forgotten.

It only takes about two generations—sometimes less—to move on from such events.

May 8 2014, is “VE Day” celebrating the U.S. victory in Europe in World War Two. I suspect that most of our younger generations, including some of the Boomers, have no idea what the “VE” stands for.

World War Two ended seven decades ago, but not only have most Americans moved on from the horror of September 11, 2001, but it would appear that even the killing of an American ambassador and three security personnel in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012 doesn’t arouse much anger even as we learn of a White House cover-up that utterly debases their sacrifice and loss.

“Dude, that was two years ago,” said one White House staff member; as crass and crude a dismissal as one can imagine.

From a perspective of more than seventy and a half years, my mind flashes back to the Watergate scandal that began in June 1972 and concluded with President Nixon’s resignation in August 1974. That was a long two years as the attending events unfolded.

Forty-three people in the Nixon administration went to jail for their participation in the cover-up. The current Attorney General received a Contempt of Congress citation for his failure to provide information about one of the administration’s many scandals and during a recent speech to the National Action Network, a group founded by Rev. Al Sharpton, asked “What Attorney General has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment?” Does the name John Mitchell ring a bell? He was Nixon’s Attorney General.

Holder apparently believes that the charges hurled at him and President Obama are mostly based on the color of their skin. We live in a nation that has a black President, a black Attorney General, and a black member of the Supreme Court, to name just a few Afro-Americans who have made it to the topmost circles of power. There are 43 black members of the House and one in the Senate. I grew up in a nation where blacks could not eat in certain restaurants, get a room at a hotel, and even had separate drinking fountains. I witnessed the Civil Rights era and these, for black Americans, are the best of times in the long history of our nation.

For nearly all Americans, however, these are far from the best of times. In 1981 President Reagan pulled the nation out of a recession and set it on a path of prosperity that lasted well in the Clinton years. A financial crisis occurred in the last year of President Bush’s second term. If President Obama didn’t want to “inherit” that, he should not have run for office, but he spent his entire first term blaming the economy and everything else on Bush to the point where he made himself look foolish. And then he was reelected!

We are now two years into Obama’s second term and failed economic and national security policies that include the shrinking of our military power to the levels of pre-World War Two years. Domestic policies are having their effect on failed foreign policies. There are some 90 million Americans out of work or who ceased to look for it.

Peace, some say, is the period between wars and there is great truth in that. Most of my life was spent in the last century, starting in the latter years of the 1930s. There were thirty-two wars, large and small, somewhere in the world during the last century, including a Cold War from 1945 to 1991 between the U.S. and the then-Soviet Union.

So far as the U.S. was concerned, our military saw action in World War One (1914-1918), World War Two (begun in 1939, we entered in 1941-1945), the Korean War (1950-1953), the Vietnam War (begun in 1959 with initial U.S. participation in 1961. We would abandon the conflict in 1973). In 1990 the U.S. led the Persian Gulf War to drive Iraq’s Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait. We would invade Iraq in 2003 to depose Hussein. In the wake of the 9/11/2001 attack, our forces were dispatched to Afghanistan and are in the process of withdrawing.

War is the way nations tend to settle their differences. Despite the creation of the United Nations after World War Two ended, the U.S. has been engaged in wars and their deterrence. The rest of the world during the last century pursued wars in places that included Mexico, Russia, China, Spain and the rest of Europe, the French Indochina War, the French-Algerian War, the Soviet-Afghan War, the Iran-Iraq War, the third Balkan War, the Rwandan genocide, and the wars that Israel has endured over the more than sixty years of its existence.

This is why many are inclined to think, not only in terms of the U.S. economy, but in response to events beyond our borders —once again in Europe— that the conflict in the Ukraine may metastasize into World War Three if NATO is forced to confront a Russia behaving like it did before its former government collapsed.

I would, however, suggest that the greatest threat of war is staring the entire world in the face and that is an Iran with nuclear weapons.

We have a President who has displayed virtually no knowledge, nor understanding of the history briefly detailed here. Instead, he has pursued a deal with an Iran that has hated the U.S. (and Israel) as the heart of its foreign policy since 1979, As one former senior intelligence official was recently quoted as saying,

“The fear is that the Iranians are going to pretend to give up their nuclear weapons program—and we are going to pretend to believe them.”

The only outcome of that would be an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities by Israel for whom a nuclear Iran would be a second Holocaust. Israel destroyed a nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981 and in Syria in 2007.

In a broader context, we and the rest of the world are living in an era in which Islam is challenging Western, modern civilization with precepts that embrace beheading, amputation, stoning to death, and other forms of violence, often against women, that must be confronted and defeated.

So, if these are best of times, they could rapidly turn into the worst of times…again.

c Alan Caruba

About:
Alan Caruba’s commentaries are posted daily at “Warning Signs” his popular blog and thereafter on dozens of other websites and blogs. If you love to read, visit his monthly report on new books at Bookviews.

  • One User comment to “Caruba: The Worst of Times, the Best of Times”

    1. oldshooter on May 9, 2014 at 11:21 AM said:

      I’m old enough to have grown up during the segregation years in the US, although as a military brat I was seldom exposed to it (we never lived in the south during those years, but I saw it in South Dakota when we were stationed there). I was a strong, and active, supporter of the Equal Rights movement, and later the Civil Rights movement, including marching and demonstrating for black rights (I’m White). So I have some long term interests and background in the history of all this.
      It has been my experience that our modern generation (actually the last 2 generations in our country), perhaps because they grew up too late to have ever witnessed true racial discrimination, or institutionalized racism, are unable to distinguish between “individual bigotry” and “institutional racism.” I will state now, that I flatly do not believe the latter still exists in the US today. Indeed, with our current laws and social climate, it would be nearly impossible. If you disagree, then I challenge you to show me the state with segregated facilities or laws in any way segregating citizens by race; show me the state that legally bars any (citizen) minority from voting or participating in the political system; show me the state that still refuses to allow minority ethnic groups to hold office; show me the state (or for that matter, political party) that has no black (or other minority) business and professional leaders.
      In 1955, I could instantly have shown you DOZENS. Back then there were NO black news people, political commentators, and even minority actors were rare (and forced to play only stereotypical racial roles). There were no Blacks or Hispanics in TV commercials, minorities stayed predominantly in “their own” parts of town, etc. And not by their own choice, but because the laws and the corporate institutions forced them to. The reason there had to be demonstrations and lunch counter “sit ins” was because, back then, there was NO legal recourse for a Black or Hispanic person who wanted to use a “Whites Only” facility. It was ILLEGAL for them to do so, and going to court meant going to jail, because you were going to lose your case, because it was THE LAW, and you had clearly violated it. That was “Legal/Institutional Racism” and it no longer exists here.

      What we DO still have, and will always have, are individual bigots. Donald Sterling may be the latest public example of such, but then, so is Al Sharpton. As long as we live in a free country, we not only WILL have individual bigots, but we SHOULD. There will always be those who disagree with the majority, for good reasons or bad, for personal reasons or professional ones, and that kind of stupidity is not only allowed, but protected, by our Constitution and lesser laws. It may well be reprehensible, and we may not want to associate with such bigots, but we can most appropriately respond today by ostracizing them from our social circles, not by trying to punish them legally. Everyone has a right to be stupid or to be a bigot; what no one has the right to do, and what the whole civil rights movement was fighting in the first place, is pass laws that discriminate against American Citizens based on their race (or their opinions).

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Joe Luser: Who makes or sells that first target?
      • RDNK: It might require other nations to drive the isrealis out of palestian land. Israel is just an international...
      • Charlie: Thanks for the opportunity to own a fine rifle for free.
      • oldshooter: Years ago, while serving in the Navy on Guam, one of my sailors introduced me to the ultimate shotgun...
      • Jim: It is interesting that our heroic president is suspected by many to be a crypto Muslim. and that it is one...
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Win a Daniel Defense DDM4v9 Rifle

    Subscribe and receive our emails , the drawing will be August 15, 2014 maybe you will be the lucky shooter receiving a Daniel Defense DDM4v9 Rifle. For more information visit the Daniel Defense promotional page.
    Monthly email subscription from Ammoland
    13695424
    14656768