Today is Thursday, October 23, 2014rss RSS feed

By Michelle Malkin

Michelle Malkin

Michelle Malkin

Los Angeles, CA - -(Ammoland.com)- Look out, everyone: The nation’s school lunch lady, Michelle Obama, is mad.

With her federal nutrition program under fire across the country and now on Capitol Hill, Mrs. Obama put out a “forceful” call to arms this week to “health activists,” according to The Washington Post.

She’s cracking the whip. Her orders are clear: There must be no escape. The East Wing and its sycophants zealously oppose any effort to alter, delay or waive top-down school meal rules. Big Lunch must be guarded at all costs.

Progressives blame kid-hating Republicans and greedy businesses for the revolt against Mrs. Obama’s failed policies. But the truth is right around the corner in your students’ cafeterias. Districts are losing money. Discarded food is piling high. Kids are going off-campus to fill their tummies or just going hungry.

According to the School Nutrition Association, almost half of school meal programs reported declines in revenue in the 2012-13 school year, and 90 percent said food costs were up. Local nutrition directors are demanding more flexibility and freedom. Look no further than school districts in Los Angeles and Chicago.

As I noted in 2011, the L.A. Unified School District pronounced the first lady’s federally subsidized initiative a “flop” and a “disaster.” Principals reported “massive waste, with unopened milk cartons and uneaten entrees being thrown away.” The problem has only worsened. The Los Angeles Times reported last month that the city’s students throw out “at least $100,000 worth of food a day — and probably far more,” which “amounts to $18 million a year.”

Draconian federal rules dictate calorie counts, whole-grain requirements, the number of items that children must put on their trays, and even the color of the fruits and vegetables they must choose. Asked for a solution, LAUSD Food Service Director David Binkle told the Times bluntly: “We can stop forcing children to take food they don’t like and throw in the garbage.”

Or you can do what Arlington Heights District 214 in Michelle Obama’s home state of Illinois just did: Vote yourselves out of the unsavory one-size-fits-all mandate. Last week, the state’s second largest school district decided to quit the national school lunch program altogether. Officials pointed out that absurd federal guidelines prevented them from offering hard-boiled eggs, hummus, pretzels, some brands of yogurt, and nonfat milk in containers larger than 12 ounces.

The district will deliberately forgo $900,000 in federal aid and instead rely on its own nutritionist to devise healthy choices that students actually want.

One local parent summed it up well: “(T)he government can’t control everything.”

As more schools look to withdraw, you can bet on the White House to ramp up the Republican-bashing rhetoric. Mrs. Obama’s advocates have already taken to social media to complain about Big Business special interests. But let’s remember: Mrs. Obama has been working the food circuit since 2005, when the wife of newly elected Sen. Barack Obama was named to the corporate board of directors of Wal-Mart processed foods supplier TreeHouse Foods Inc. — collecting $45,000 in 2005, $51,200 in 2006, and 7,500 TreeHouse stock options worth more than $72,000 for each year.

Fact: The first lady has been the most insatiable crony at the center of the Fed Foods racket. Her nonprofit Partnership for a Healthier America has reported assets of $4.5 million from secret donors. It’s not just mean conservatives pointing out her Big Business ties. The left-wing documentary “Fed Up” made the same point before being edited under pressure. Hello, Chicago Way.

Mrs. Obama’s allies also have accused opponents of wanting to repeal “science-based” standards. But the first lady herself was caught spreading false claims that her program was responsible for reducing childhood obesity, when the decline began a decade ago.

And as I’ve reported previously, deep-pocketed Big Labor’s push to expand public union payrolls with thousands more food service workers is also driving Mrs. Obama’s agenda.

Waste, failure, lies and special interest ties. If federal food policy were really about the children, the East Wing would be embracing change. But this is not about protecting the kids. It’s about protecting Michelle Obama. Her thin-skinned response to criticism is telling:

Hell hath no fury like a Nanny State control freak scorned.

About: Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin is the author of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies” & “Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild“. Her e-mail address is malknblog@gmail.com.

  • 5 User comments to “Michelle Obama’s Control-Freak Lunch Program”

    1. Gene Clifford on May 24, 2014 at 6:38 AM said:

      With Mrs. O being a lawyer and thin skinned, somehow those 2 don’t go together, like oil and water.

    2. TSgt B on May 24, 2014 at 8:11 AM said:

      We just need to make it abundantly clear to Moochelle that she needs to keep track of her own fat ass; we’ll take care of OUR kids.

    3. BillCa on May 24, 2014 at 12:01 PM said:

      Sure, it’s all the Republicans’ fault. It couldn’t be that….
      * The calorie allotment falls short for active teens.
      * Requiring plain veggies means less flavor.
      * Not everyone likes a cup of carrots with soup.
      * The idea of limiting teens calorie intake is stupid.

      I played football and was in track in high school. At 16, I’d eat a roast beef sandwich, six Oreos and at least a pint of chocolate milk at lunch, maybe a small bag of Doritos before 2pm too. Then football practice for 2 hours, shower, walk home 2 miles. At dinner, I’d demolish a porterhouse steak, potato, applesauce, vegetable, two 12 oz glasses of milk AND a slice of pie. I went from 165 to 175 of muscle and stayed there from my sophomore through senior years and could not add any more weight. I burned it all off daily. Michelle’s program is more suited to kids sitting on their butts texting all day.

    4. hippybiker on May 24, 2014 at 4:27 PM said:

      Google “Is Michelle Obama Really a Man.” Watch the video and you will see we have a First Transvestite who’s real name is Michael Robinson.

    5. Janek on May 26, 2014 at 8:36 AM said:

      What ever happened to personal responsibility?If you can’t feed ‘em don’t breed ‘em.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • GenEarly: When the “organization” becomes too invested in the organization and not in the purpose, you...
      • nick balzano: why no pheasants stocked in northampton county. Second year in a row that pheasant hunters in...
      • Paul: Well if she hates guns so much then she could just stay where she is up in Canada. For a person that has a...
      • The Rifleman: Kudos to Traverse City Schools!
      • The Rifleman: No problem Chrissy, I think you’re the ugliest model to ever disgrace a run way, and I’m...
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Win a Russian Sniper Rifle From AimSurplus.com

    Subscribe and receive our emails , the drawing will be November 20 , 2014 maybe you will be the lucky shooter receiving a Russian 1891/30 PU 7.62x54R Mosin Nagant Sniper Rifle and a can of Ammunition. For more information visit the AimSurplus Sniper Rifle Promotion Page.
    Monthly email subscription from Ammoland
    14438736
    15036528