Today is Tuesday, September 02, 2014rss RSS feed

By Roger J. Katz, Attorney At Law

Bloody Knife

Gee, If You’re Going To Commit Murder, Please Use A Gun!

The Arbalest Quarrel

The Arbalest Quarrel

New York, N.Y. --(Ammoland.com)- This from the NY Times:

“The parents of the first three victims of Elliot O. Rodger’s murderous rampage [re: the Santa Barbara killings on May 23, 2014] said they were frustrated by the authorities handling of the case. . . . It was not clear how the slight Mr. Rodger, 22, was able to over-power the three, who were stabbed to death [all young men, not women]. In a joint interview, the parents told The Washington Post that they had visited the crime scene and had seen no blood on the walls or ceiling. The police had removed a 6-by-5 foot piece of carpeting in one bedroom, and a swath of vinyl flooring around the toilet had been cut out. They said the limited amount of material removed from the apartment suggested the killings had been confined to a small space. They criticized the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s department for not telling them how it believed the killings had been carried out, and said they were angered by public health and legal systems that they said valued the rights of the mentally ill, including Mr. Rodger, over those who may become their victims.” New York Times, “Inquiry Vexes Parents of 3 Slain in Spree.”

The Article appeared on page 15 of the Sunday, June 22, 2014 edition of the NY Times. What’s immediately evident, given a description of the knifing attack that killed three men, is that a knife is as useful a killing implement as a gun in the hands of a person who’s set on doing violence to another – in this case, to three others, all other men. That point, although evident to any sensible person, isn’t evident to the NY Times. The paper demonstrates incredulity that “the slight Mr. Rodger, 22, was able to over-power the three, who were stabbed to death.”

So, we are to assume the New York Times would not have any reason to doubt Mr. Rodger’s ability to snuff the life out of the three young men had he done the proper thing and used a gun on them as he had on the young women whom next he killed.

That would have made good copy for the paper and would certainly be consistent with the fanciful world the paper has created for its readers:

  • (1) guns alone are the main vehicle of and hallmark of violence in America;
  • (2) it is easy to kill with a gun, but not so easy to kill with any other object;
  • (3) if a person is going on a killing rampage, it is best that he do so using a gun, for otherwise, how can the public be duped into going along with a complete gun ban if any other object can be utilized to kill another just as easily; and
  • (4) killers have a decided preference for guns.

Unfortunately, for the NY Times and the antigun zealots, Elliot Rodger didn’t go along with the game plan.

Apparently, he wasn’t aware of the four axioms of antigun logic. Perhaps Rodger didn’t want to show he was prejudiced in his choice of killing implements. Be that as it may, the three young men Rodger killed with a knife, in lieu of a gun, are just as dead. No doubt the New York Times would’ve loved to interview both Rodger and his male victims to get a handle on just how the slight Elliot O. Rodger was able to kill three men in close quarters, with but a knife.

The last sentence of the N.Y. Times Article makes an important point although you might miss it at first glance:

“Sheriff Bill Brown [of the Santa Barbara County sheriff’s department] has said the three men were stabbed repeatedly with sharp objects and [he] called the crime scene ‘pretty horrific.’”

Did you catch it? Probably not; and that’s understandable – because what you missed wasn’t there to be found. It was a point that the New York Times never fails to make when reporting on horrific gun violence. But, nonetheless, the newspaper did fail to make the point here. For, curiously absent from that last sentence of the NY Times Article and – indeed – what is curiously and notably absent from the entirety of that June 22nd New York Times news article, is any remonstration against the horrors of knives and the need to get knives out of the hands of civilians.

Obviously, the New York Times didn’t choose to dwell on the lethality of knives. The New York Times didn’t, in fact, choose to make anything of it. The New York Times wished decidedly and decisively, to avoid any discussion about it….

Read the rest here at : http://arbalestquarrel.com/gee-youre-going-commit-murder-please-use-gun/

About The Arbalest Quarrel
Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

www.arbalestquarrel.com

  • Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Eric: I was glad to see Magpul stayed with their ethics. Refreshing in this age of corporate greed.
      • Eric: How about we find a billionaire who likes firearms and talk about him.
      • TEX: Clay,aint all of Kali a fricking gun free zone ?
      • Eric: I think these false reports and swatting incidents are under punished. The people commiting these lies should...
      • Eric: My favorite is Hiduminium , used on a model 50.64.
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • AmmoLand Poll

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    13548200
    14156256