Today is Wednesday, October 01, 2014rss RSS feed

By Dean Weingarten

Some of the Guns Confiscated and Destroyed in Australia

Some of the Guns Confiscated and Destroyed in Australia

Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten

Arizona - -(Ammoland.com)- In the Monash University Shooting, only two people were killed, so it does not make the list of mass killings, in which four people unrelated to the shooter are required to meet the definition of a mass killing.

It was not for lack of trying.   The shooter had six handguns, which it appears that he obtained legally.   He killed two people and wounded five others before he was stopped by citizens who rushed him as he fumbled for one of the other five handguns on his person.

While the wounded lecturer of the class, was not armed, he exhibited great courage in restraining him as a martial arts trained student tackled him.  All of this occurred in 2002, five years after the huge gun confiscation system was put into place in Australia.

The only academic study that attempts to determine if the Australian gun confiscation scheme had any effect on mass shootings uses the “four dead” definition, so it excludes the Monash University shooting.   It did not find any evidence that the confiscation reduced mass shootings.  This in depth article explores how extremely restrictive gun control was pushed onto Australians.

The Monash case illustrates the problem with documenting those incidents where citizens resist, either armed or unarmed:  often they stop the killing before it reaches the levels required to define the event as a mass killing.  The idea that  that “resistance is futile” is thus reinforced; because when a mass killing is stopped, it is not a “mass killing” and does not receive the media coverage of events where four or more people are killed.  Here is a link of over a dozen cases where mass killings were clearly stopped by armed citizens.

In this study of media reported mass shootings, the reporter found that when a shooting was stopped by a civilian, the number of dead averaged 2.2, where when the police were relied on, the number was 14.3.

This is obvious when you consider it: there are only about 600,00 to 750,000 police in the United States.   When a non-police person stops a mass attack, it is likely to be much faster than a police response.
c2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included. Link to Gun Watch

About Dean Weingarten;

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • One User comment to “Obama Ignores Australian ‘Mass Shooting’ in 2002”

    1. robert on June 21, 2014 at 2:38 AM said:

      An important point about the Monash/mass shooting.. Who decided a mass shooting was the same thing as a mass murder? It seems dishonest that 7 people shot is not a mass shooting.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Jim: Thank you Wild Bill.
      • Ben: I can certainly see how there would be a need for EVERYONE at the fair to be armed, in light of all the...
      • VT Patriot: Thanx Wild Bill. This sums it all up pretty well. We have to stop these moronic libs from destroying our...
      • Tom: The real kicker is that “mass shootings” are so rare that the government feels compelled to...
      • TJ: As 1389AD stated above: “Acting like a lady or a gentleman (as the case may be) lends credibility.”...
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • AmmoLand Poll

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    14154760
    14754704