Today is Monday, October 20, 2014rss RSS feed

ATF Advises Assembly Short Barrel Rifles & Shotguns Must Comply with Imported Parts Rule.

Short Barreled Shotgun

ATF Advises Short Barrel Rifles & Shotguns Must Comply with Imported Parts Rule

FireArms Import/Export Roundtable Trade Group

FireArms Import/Export Roundtable Trade Group

Washington, DC --(Ammoland.com)- The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) recently advised a licensed manufacturer that its assembly of a short barrel rifle utilizing imported parts must comply with 18 U.S.C. § 922(r).

This position is significant, as the general understanding in the industry has been that this provision of the Gun Control Act (GCA) does not apply to short barrel rifles and short barrel shotguns regulated under the National Firearms Act (NFA).

This client alert will explain the requirements of section 922(r) and how it applies to domestic manufacture of short barrel rifles and short barrel shotguns utilizing imported parts.

I. Legal Background

Section 922(r), Title 18, United States Code, makes it unlawful for any person to assemble from imported parts any semiautomatic rifle or any shotgun which is identical to any rifle or shotgun prohibited from importation under the “sporting purposes” test of section 925(d)(3) of the Gun Control Act. The purpose of this provision of the GCA is to prevent persons from circumventing the import restrictions of the statute by importing unassembled rifles and shotguns and assembling them into nonsporting configuration in the United States. ATF regulations issued under this provision of the GCA are found in 27 C.F.R. § 478.39.

Willful violations of section 922(r) are punishable by a fine of up to $250,000, imprisonment for a term of no more than 5 years, or both. Such violations may also result in seizure and forfeiture of firearms involved in the violations and in license revocation.

Before we discuss the regulatory provisions, let’s focus on the “sporting purposes” test of the GCA. There is a lot of history and meaning packed into those two words with a significant amount of agency explanation to assist in clarifying the term.

1. Criteria for Nonsporting Rifles

There are two ATF studies on “sporting purposes” as that term is applied to rifles, the first published in 1989 and the second in 1998. The 1998 study modified the criteria announced in the 1989 study, and we will focus on the more recent criteria. In the 1998, titled “Department of the Treasury Study on the Sporting Suitability of Modified Semiautomatic Assault Rifles,” ATF specified the following criteria for determining whether a semiautomatic rifle is a nonsporting rifle: (1) the rifle is a semiautomatic version of a machinegun; and (2) the rifle is chambered to accept a centerfire cartridge case having a length of 2.25 inches or less; and (3) the rifle has one or more of the following military features:

Ability to accept a detachable magazine with a capacity of more than 10 rounds

  • Folding or telescoping stock
  • Separate pistol grip
  • Ability to accept a bayonet
  • Flash suppressor
  • Bipod
  • Grenade launcher
  • Night sights

A full copy of the published report can be accessed on ATF’s website here:

http://www.atf.gov/files/publications/download/treas/treas-study-on-sporting-suitability-of-modified-semiautomatic-assault-rifles.pdf

2. Criteria for Nonsporting Shotguns

In January 2011, ATF published a study on the importability of shotguns. This was the first time ATF published definitive criteria on the physical features that render a particular shotgun nonsporting. The study can be found on ATF’s website here:

http://www.atf.gov/files/firearms/industry/january-2011-importability-of-certain-shotguns.pdf

On July 2, 2012, ATF published a follow-up report responding to the 21,000 comments it received from interested persons on the 2011 shotgun report. In response to the comments, ATF modified the criteria published in 2011 by removing two features, i.e., a forward pistol grip and an integrated rail system. The July 2, 2012 report can be found on ATF’s website here:

http://www.atf.gov/files/firearms/industry/july-2012-importability-of-certain-shotguns.pdf

The final criteria adopted by ATF for nonsporting shotguns are the following:

  • Folding, telescoping, or collapsible stock
  • Bayonet lug
  • Flash suppressor
  • Magazine over 5 rounds or a drum magazine
  • Grenade launcher mount
  • Light enhancing device
  • Excessive weight (greater than 10 pounds for 12-gauge or smaller)
  • Excessive bulk (greater than 3 inches in width and/or greater than 4 inches in depth)

As stated in both studies, any one of the above criteria render a particular shotgun nonsporting and ineligible for importation into the U.S. for commercial sale.

3. Application of 18 U.S.C. § 922(r) to Assembly of Nonsporting Rifles and Nonsporting Shotguns

ATF regulations in 27 C.F.R. § 478.39 implement the provisions of GCA section 922(r), providing specific guidance on the particular parts and how many of those parts can be used to avoid the domestic assembly prohibitions. Of course, if the assembled rifle or shotgun is sporting, then the 922(r) restrictions do not apply. However, if the semiautomatic rifle or shotgun to be assembled in the U.S. would be classified by ATF as nonsporting, then 922(r) and the provisions of Section 478.39 govern the assembly. This regulation sets forth a list of 20 of the parts that ATF considered to be major components of rifles and shotguns when it adopted this regulation in 1993.[1] The regulation then establishes the rule that section 922(r) is violated only if the nonsporting semiautomatic rifle or nonsporting shotgun is assembled with more than 10 imported parts of the 20 parts listed in the regulation, as follows:

  • Frames, receivers, receiver castings, forgings or stampings
  • Barrels
  • Barrel extensions
  • Mounting blocks (trunions)
  • Muzzle attachments
  • Bolts
  • Bolt carriers
  • Operating rods
  • Gas pistons
  • Trigger housings
  • Triggers
  • Hammers
  • Sears
  • Disconnectors
  • Buttstocks
  • Pistol grips
  • Forearms, handguards
  • Magazine bodies
  • Followers
  • Floorplates

4. Meaning of the Word “Assemble”

Section 922(r) makes it unlawful for any person to assemble from imported parts any nonsporting semiautomatic rifle or nonsporting shotgun. The term is not defined in the statute or regulations, and ATF takes the position that assembly has its ordinary, everyday meaning, including the act of putting together a firearm from unassembled components, adding parts to a complete or partially complete firearm, and removing parts from a completed firearm and adding new parts. As an example, a manufacturer who adds a shoulder stock to a barreled action or a pistol would “assemble” the resulting rifle. “Assembly” would also occur when a folding stock, flash suppressor, or night sights are added to a rifle. The term “assemble” would also apply to a situation where machining is necessary before a part is added to a firearm, such as when a magazine well is machined and a magazine is added to a rifle. Questions concerning particular manufacturing operations and whether they are “assembly” should be referred to ATF’s Firearms Technology Branch.

II. Does Section 922(r) Apply to Short Barrel Rifles and Short Barrel Shotguns?

Yes. Section 922(r) applies to the domestic assembly of short barrel rifles and short barrel shotguns if they are also nonsporting under 18 U.S.C. § 925(d)(3).

Rifles having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length are regulated under the National Firearms Act (NFA). Shotguns having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length are also regulated under the NFA. ATF recently advised a manufacturer that its attachment of a shoulder stock to an imported semiautomatic pistol would violate section 922(r) unless the manufacturer added enough domestically made parts to avoid the prohibitions set forth in the regulation. The basis for this advice was that the resulting short barrel rifle would also be nonsporting because it had a detachable magazine with a capacity of more than 10 rounds and a separate pistol grip, both identified as nonsporting features in ATF’s 1998 import study. Thus, in addition to complying with the registration requirements of the NFA, the manufacturer must switch out a number of the pistol’s component parts to ensure that no more than 10 of the parts listed in section 478.39 are imported. The same rationale would apply to a short barrel shotgun imported into the United States, then reconfigured so it had one or more of the features set forth in the 2012 shotgun study.

Just to clarify this convoluted issue, it is not ATF’s position that all short barrel rifles and all short barrel shotguns are nonsporting and therefore subject to section 922(r). Rather, it is ATF’s position that if the short barrel shotgun or short barrel rifle has one or more nonsporting features, then it cannot be assembled with more than 10 of the imported parts listed in section 478.39.

III. Conclusion

Manufacturers who import firearms or modify imported firearms must be wary of adding domestically made parts to such firearms if the final result is a semiautomatic rifle or shotgun that would fail ATF’s sporting purposes test. The provisions of section 922(r) also apply to short barrel rifles and short barrel shotguns if they have nonsporting features and are assembled from imported parts. Do not put your license at risk by inadvertently violating this provision of the law.

****

This Alert is for general informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice or legal opinion. This Alert is not intended to take the place of consultation with an attorney and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

[1] It is important to note that certain members of Congress are urging the Administration to redraft the parts list in section 478.39 to make it more difficult for manufacturers to modify imported rifles and shotguns by adding nonsporting features. Earlier this year, Senator Dianne Feinstein and other members of Congress recently sent a letter to the President requesting that he take action to ban importation of “assault weapons” and that he direct ATF to revisit the domestic assembly restrictions imposed by section 922(r).

The F.A.I.R. Trade Group is a 501(c) (6) organization dedicated since 1994 to protecting the interests of the firearms and ammunition import and export community. F.A.I.R. operates entirely on the funds derived from our dues-paying membership. If you are interested in becoming a member or contributing to the organization, please visit our website at: www.fairtradegroup.org.

  • 10 User comments to “ATF Expands It Authority to Regulate Short Barrel Rifle & Shotgun Manufacturing”

    1. What is sporting? Stretching words to unseat the 2nd amendment.

    2. Its amazing who a supposedly free population is willing to follow an UN Constitutional AGENCY of a Corporation when it continually makes up its own rules.

      Do you follow any of the Rules that IBM or APPLE make if you don’t work for them? No?

      Then why the hell does anyone follow these fools.

      F&*$ the ATF and the rest of Washington DC.

      Carry on Sheeple.

    3. @Eric,

      “Sporting” is what the NRA came up with as they helped to write most of the regulations subverting the 2nd.

    4. Big Bill on August 28, 2014 at 1:15 PM said:

      @mikrat,
      Sometimes, when you are facing a loaded shotgun in your face, the best course of action is to back down.
      Put another way, when faced with legislation that will totally screw with your rights, sometimes it’s better to help re-write them than to stand your ground, and get shot in the face.
      Yes, it sucks. The alternative sucks worse.

    5. Well the problem is that We The People let them continue to write Legislation that continues down the same path be it Repulocrats or Democons.

      Evil is evil no mater if one seems lessor at the time.

      Maybe its time or long past to point that loaded shotgun back at them and regain the power WE are supposed to have and stop being played like a bunch of sheep.

    6. Winston Smith on August 28, 2014 at 2:32 PM said:

      Dont the lowest common denominators at BATF know that they dont have to be jackbooted criminals anymore? Nope they too can get food stamps ,just like the rest of their lot. All for doing nothing too! ;) They do know however that the fuse has been lit ,and when the “constitutional reset switch” is flipped, that they are history! And rightly so. The lawlessness this administration practices is enough to encourage it on a mass scale. After all if BATF and the White House can run guns to the cartels in Mexico.

    7. Self defense has no sporting clause , yet ATF wants to disarm law abiding citizens , why do you think. So you can be a victim or controlled. I dont see anything about sporting and it violates the Alaska Constitution which states the right of the individual to bear arms shall not be infringed.

    8. “yet ATF wants to disarm law abiding citizens”

      Being Law Abiding is a big part of our problem – No One actually reads the “Laws” to understand who they are for or actually control, yet the sheep blindly follow anything they are told is THE LAW – YOU MUST OBEY!

      People are supreme, not the state.
      See: Waring v. the Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia at 93.

      Arms restrictions even concealed weapons bans are unconstitutional, since arms bearing is an individual right and the legislature may not restrict any aspect of such a right.
      Bliss v. Commonwealth

      UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 42, SECTION 1988
      When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the
      Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and no one is bound to obey it.”
      State v. Sutton, 63 Minn. 147 65 NW 262 30 ALR 660. Also see (Watson v.
      Memphis, 375 US 526; 10 L Ed 529; 83 S.Ct. 1314)

      The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.
      Cockrum v. State

      “A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),

      A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law,)

      A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’of legislature is not “Law,” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).

      All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws.

      “All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”
(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); ”

      “…an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void…” -Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137; 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803)

      Turn off the stupid Football game and do some studying of reality.

    9. tenringrob on August 29, 2014 at 6:45 AM said:

      Sporting and 2nd Amendment. The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting, target shooting, trap, clays or any other SPORTING or SHOOTING sports. It’s about our RIGHT to self defense and to assure government does not INFRINGE upon ANY of the RIGHTS mentioned in the BILL of RIGHTS. Why can’t writers and politicians understand this?They have to take an oath of office stating they will defend the Constitution and the first thing they do is try to change it. Vote out anyone who violates their oath.

    10. JimInMT on August 30, 2014 at 1:39 PM said:

      There is no phrase “law-abiding” anywhere in the US Constitution. Therefore, even felons have ALL the same rights as the rest of us peons. Makes you wonder about the big, brave “law-abiders” when put this way – felons refuse to be government-victims, while “thuh peeeeepuuulll” accept any stupid thing that Congress or unconstitutional agents propose.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Ed: Only 4? Per our Constitution, “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be...
      • Jake Gambini: Sad to say that I will not be taking my business here in the future, and I will continue to advise...
      • KOBUS BREYTENBACH: I am living in South AFRICA ALSO LOOKING FOR A DEALER TO BUT FROM?
      • Dave: The best thing the gun industry to do is stop selling their wares to those areas. If they are anti gun, fine....
      • freewill: Its Mayors against self defense. the so called gun show loophole. if a person thats strapped for quick cash...
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    14474656
    15090776