Dr. Gary Mauser’s Commentary On The International Small Arms Control Standards (ISACS) National Regulation Of Civilian Access To Small Arms And Light Weapons. ISACS 03.30:2015(E) – Draft 3.1
Canada –-(Ammoland.com)- Introduction: Thank you for the opportunity to provide my thoughts on Module 3.30 National regulation of civilian access to small arms and light weapons.
I find this module totally unacceptable and cannot support it.
The proposed regulatory scheme is arbitrarily complex and makes exceptionally flattering assumptions about government that are simply inappropriate in the real world.
If adopted, this module would not only be ineffective in fighting criminal violence, but at the same time would stimulate the growth of expensive bureaucracies. It is even likely that these proposals could facilitate corruption.
This module reveals CASA’s [Coordinating Action on Small Arms] profound misunderstanding of the natural rights of citizens and their relationship to government.
Read the rest: https://www.sfu.ca/~mauser/papers/ISACS/ISACS2015.pdf
INTERNATIONAL SMALL ARMS CONTROL STANDARDS (ISACS) Practical guidance on implementing global commitments to control small arms and light weapons: https://www.smallarmsstandards.org
DRAFT 3.1 – NATIONAL REGULATION OF CIVILIAN ACCESS TO SMALL ARMS AND LIGHT WEAPONS – ISACS 03.30:2015(E): https://www.sfu.ca/~mauser/papers/ISACS/civilians.pdf
Gary Mauser is a Professor Emeritus at the Institute for Canadian Urban Research Studies, Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University. Gary can be reached at: [email protected]
I firmly believe our President or anyone should be signing any treaty with the U.N. including our 46 senators that also have tried to give our constitutional God given rights away. . We are a sovereign nation with our own constitution that has worked for over 200 years. I will never register my firearms, or magazines, or ammo. Come and take it. This is my line in the sand.
And this, folks, is why you always proofread your posts BEFORE you hit the “post” button. One word omitted changing the entire meaning. At least I’m guessing that’s what happened.