A Time to Fight for Freedom and the Constitution

By Dean Weingarten

Korean men defending Koreatown during the 1992 LA riots.
Korean men defending Koreatown during the 1992 LA riots.

 

Dean Weingarten
Dean Weingarten

Arizona – -(Ammoland.com)- In 2012, nearly four years ago, after the shooting at Sandy Hook, the future of the Republic and the Constitution looked dim.  We had seen a President who disdained the Constitution, who flaunted his power, who had the media on his side and a Congress that conspired with him, be re-elected.  This happened in spite of numerous scandals that should have resulted in his impeachment.

It appeared the seeds of severe European type gun control were going to pass Congress.  Leaders among Second Amendment supporters were grim.  Some said that we could not win. Some claimed that the best we could do was to  compromise and hope to mitigate the damage.  They were wrong.  It took enormous hard work.  It took determination and guts.  But we won.

The Gun Owners of America were steadfast.  The NRA held firm.  No more infringements on the Second Amendment.  Tens of millions of activists across the nation made our case in emails, tweets, essays, comments, and discussion boards.  We sent overwhelming numbers of phone calls and emails to our representatives.  We were right and we won. No more infringements were passed in Congress.  A couple of Democrat states, financed with Bloomberg money, fortified with dirty tricks, passed some evil measures in a couple of legislatures.  Patriots have steadfastly refused to comply.  In a dozen other states, Second Amendment freedoms are being restored.

Now we face another daunting battle.   This time, the odds have improved. We removed some weak sisters in the Congress who claimed to be on our side.  The President who wants us disarmed has seven months in office, not another four years.  The presumed Republican nominee, Donald Trump, has made support of the Second Amendment a major theme in his campaign.  Just as important, the old media cartel has been weakened.  Many people see how it has been advancing its agenda with lies and through manipulation. It is not as hard for a majority to understand how much we have been lied to and mislead.  For the first time in 50 years, a majority of Americans equate guns with safety instead of fear.  Since 2012, 50 million guns have been added to the private stock in the United States.

It makes absolutely no sense, after a successful Islamic terror attack that killed 49 people and wounded 53 more, to call for the disarmament of Americans. Yet that is exactly what Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton are calling for.

The rifles they want to take from us are precisely those most protected by the Constitution. Rifles that are the most useful for spontaneous citizen militias, as expected by the Second Amendment.

They are the type of firearm that is least used to murder.  Twice as many people are killed with hands and feet as are killed with rifles in the United States.   Of all the murders in the United States, only 2% are committed with rifles.  Sport utility rifles, that the President and the Democrat nominee want to ban, are only a fraction of those.  They are about 10-20 percent of the rifles in the country, and are increasing in popularity daily.

Sport utility rifles are the most popular rifles in the last 10 years.  They are selling like Ice Cream on a hot August day in Florida.  They are semi-automatics, similar to rifles that have been sold for a hundred years. They are the rifles that the present administration and Democrat candidate want to take from you.

It is time to fight; not with rifles but with words.  I pray that we never have to fight with the rifles.  It is far better if we win with words. We have the facts, the culture, and the Constitution on our side.  We are winning this fight, but we have to fight if we are going to win.  Similar to the horror attack in Orlando, if we do not fight back we lose.

You can and must join the fight.  See an article that claims that guns are not useful for self defense?  Make a comment.  There are plenty of facts available on the Internet for you to use.  Hear that your Congresscritter is waffling? Let them know that you will not tolerate it.

Be polite; it empowers your words more than cussing or other angry rhetoric.   See that an entertainer or commercial enterprise has bowed down to political correctness and the two minute hate of Second Amendment supporters?  Let them know that you will not support them.  Be polite.  It is a force multiplier.

Use sarcasm, cartoons, humor, and satire.  Our opponents need to be laughed at.

Use social media to spread the truth.  Do not let the disarmists take over the means of communication, as they have in the past.

Yes, it is a tough fight.  Yes, our adversaries have money, power, the major media, and the power of fraud and lies.

We can beat them.  We have done it before.  But, we will not beat them if we do not fight!

Definition of  disarmist
©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Link to Gun Watch

About Dean Weingarten;

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

45 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/federal-statutes#section242 Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or… Read more »

Tom C.

The President jumped on Air Force One today and headed to Orlando to show his sorrow for the tragedy. I understand that a portion of those killed were not in this country legally. He doesn’t bother if an American passes away or a Military person is brought back in a body bag. Then to slap us on the face he wants to take our guns away so we can not defend ourselves against the savages that come here, with a free pass, to shoot us up. What’s up with all this a**backward thinking? There is a story in there and… Read more »

Prosuceguy

I feel the the fbi has failed. This is the presidents fault correct? If the laws in are country are in forced this would not happen. Now the left says we need to do something about guns and ban ar style rifles. Well, guess what, America has armed itself already and we are ready to fight the fight against terror. What would happen if they try to take those guns from us. They want us to not have them.? What is wrong with them? We will defend Their rights and use them if need be. The government has failed, so… Read more »

Harold Bryan

https://act.nraila.org/composeletters.aspx?AlertID=261 The above link, is for a letter to our representatives to not allow the passage of any ‘anti-gun” bills in light of the Terror attack in Orlando. The real person guilty for these attacks is our President. He is the one that opened our borders with open arms for his Islamic friends to come and try to make America another Islamic State. This is what they do. They have attacks to make the people hate guns but the real reason behind it is then they will try to disarm Americans so they face no armed opposition and can do… Read more »

Jim Macklin

The AR does not stand for Automatic Rifle, Assault Rifle or other possible AR derivative. A man named Gene Stoner invented the design while he was employed by the Fairchild Aerospace Corp. Fairchild formed teh Armalite Corp to manufacture the M16 rifle for the ARMY. But Colt got the big contract. Colt was the sole provider during the early days of the Vietnam Wat. Colt named the semi-auto only version of the M16 the AT 15. The rifle was not terribly accurate or reliable and millions of dollars were spent on improvements in manufacturing technology. Accuracy and reliability has improved.… Read more »

Colonialgirl

WHAT’S WITH THE CENSORSHIP ON THIS WEB SITE ?
THIS IS THE SECOND TIME A POST OF MINE HAS NOT POSTED AS IT SHOULD HAVE.

Colonialgirl

Once again, a so-called “Gun Free Zone” has ONLY served to protect the Islamic Terrorist shooter. The law abiding American citizens in the club had no means of protection. TO terrorists, “GUN FREE” means its a FREE FIRE LOCATION with no danger of one of the targets being able to return fire. Then immediately we get the muslim president and the shrill hag dancing in the blood demanding more laws to DISARM the innocent citizens, they are rapidly joined by the other dimorats or is it Dimocraps demanding that ALL Americans be disarmed and the everybody have their AR (ARMALITE… Read more »

Fb

The store owners on that roof during the LA riots is a perfect example why we need to stand our ground against an AWB.

Gene Ralno

Those howling the loudest right now are the very ones who depend on fear, uncertainty, doubt, racism, suspicion, et al., ad nauseam. Finding their political rhetoric in shambles, they now import tens of thousands of able bodied men from terrorist nations and filibuster for more limits on personal self defense. This caterwauling is nothing more than theater. The outcome is predictable. Millions will shop this weekend for the firearms they know the democrats hope to restrict and then confiscate. If you already hate democrats, you’ll soon hate ’em more.

José Ortega

As horrible as what happened in Orlando is, I the I have yet to see a posting from any of us that support our constitutional right, wondering what would have happened if any one at the club had a gun? Bad persons, deranged persons, terrorists or any other type of scum with a gun can only be stopped by 1 or more good persons with a gun!