“As a last resort, attempt to take the active shooter down. When the shooter is at close range and you cannot flee, your chance of survival is much greater if you try to incapacitate him/her.”
Basically, Clinton is dictating the terms of surrender to American gun owners and presuming they will just roll over and take it..
It’s what he said in a clip that’s not getting much attention that illustrates the danger in presuming O’Reilly to be 2A-informed and correct.
Smith-Soto is creating a discriminatory and hostile environment against those who choose to exercise a right he does not agree with, willfully disregarding UTEP’s “harassment” policy.
No one who wants to prohibit the tools of self-defense is willing to acknowledge a special contractual relationship with a duty to protect all who submit to their demands.
Occupation-based gun bans create an opportunity for a dangerous slippery slope.
Bury’s ruling is not likely to lessen skepticism on the part of those who believe the system is rigged, and that for reasons yet unknown, wagons for both parties have been circled.
Nothing has changed as far as “gun free” campuses are concerned. They still guarantee would-be predators the one thing they crave the most: Success.
But the real crux of the matter is in the time-to-crime number … The New York average is 14.8 years. Compare that to the national average of 10.88 years.
That certainly doesn’t sound like anything “background checks” or a “high capacity magazine” ban would have any impact on. It sounds like they just don’t want anyone to have a gun.
Let’s break this con job down further. First, get rid of the notion that what the antis want has anything to do with “universal background checks.”
If you let the enemy establish a beachhead without a fight, it will simply use that as the launching point for the next incursion into deeper territory.
If a violent criminal is so dangerous that he poses a physical threat to innocents, letting him wander freely among us makes as much sense as opening the cage and letting out a man-eating lion…
There’s a time and a place for courtesy, but there is no one-size-fits all tactic for everyone to follow. Respect is something that’s earned…
Before Fast and Furious, there was Wide Receiver, a surveillance operation by ATF, ostensibly to track straw purchasers and to identify how some guns are smuggled into Mexico from the U.S. to help supply the drug cartels with firepower.
Help is being requested to find documented instances of civilian heroes who used a gun to save others, and to include those stories in a program to educate young people.
Credible rumors say anti-gun Sen. Dianne Feinstein will be coming for our guns with a vengeance of Obama wins.
So-called ‘buybacks’ work to the advantage of those who would control us through both the law and law-breaking.
Firearms rights activists are urging candidate Paul Ryan to confront incumbent Joe Biden on Fast and Furious gunwalking in tonight’s Vice Presidential debate.
Instead of being government watchdogs, many in the mainstream press have become propagandists, and in some cases, domestic enemies.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has once more been asked to share what he knows about gunwalking in Texas in a letter sent yesterday by Sen. John Cornyn.
So-called “professional journalists” with no skin in the game presume to educate their readers about the administration’s involvement in gunwalking.
Gungrabbers want to impose New York City-style “gun control” on all of us–and even that won’t be enough to satisfy them.
A captured Fast and Furious murder suspect, a documentary in the making, and a Federal Firearms Licensee fighting revocation by ATF were all subjects explored last week in the Gun Rights Examiner column.
Fundraising has begun to produce a film showing the historical injustices of gun control, and how that carries over to the present day.
If Mitt Romney is serious about applauding Congressional investigations into Fast and Furious gunwalking, there’s one easy thing he can do to help advance them.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s “let them eat cake” arrogance shows how offensively absurd his anti-defense policies are.
An edict from an unaccountable federal bureaucrat presumes authority to ban possession of guns anywhere and any time they feel like coming up with a lame justification.
With the militarization of police come concerns that, in addition to urban warfare and sniping, training in lawful orders and the Constitution must also be assured.
Congressional Fast and Furious investigators intend to audit the auditor.
Documentation supports the conclusion that an innocent man has been convicted of illegal gun dealing while those who prosecuted him engaged in it.
Trial testimony transcripts and a press release from Immigration and Customs Enforcement show an El Paso gun dealer was cooperating with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in its surveillance of suspected gun traffickers as part of a joint eight-month operation between ICE and ATF.
Documents from the case of FBI agent John Shipley, convicted of dealing in firearms without a license, bolster claims that he was merely an active collector, and further reveal evidence of guns being smuggled to Mexico following ATF-directed deals by suspects under extended surveillance.
Prosecutor’s let Philly’s top cop get away with violations they’d lock anybody else up and throw away the key for.
A new book and online gun law resource provides vital information of interest to gun owners.
Though acquitted of the most serious charges, guilty findings on some Form 4473s could still send a railroaded gun dealer family to prison and turn them into prohibited persons for life.
That The Washington Post chose not to tell its readers about the Fast and Furious report released by Congress shows the paper is not interested in news so much as propaganda for the Obama administration.
By not including new media reporters on important releases, the Oversight Committee is making a mistake if it thinks it can trust the establishment press to provide unbiased and complete reporting.
The head of a gun dealer family on trial for illegal sales took the stand in his own defense as more questions about government conduct are being raised.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s loopy assertion that “shall not be infringed” means “subject to reasonable restrictions” is old news for those who have ooked past his useful label of being portrayed as an “originalist.”