HomeDirectorySubmit NewsSubscriptionsAbout UsAdvertiseRecent Posts

 
People like this. Be the first of your friends.

Bloomberg’s Push For New Gun Control Won’t Stop Illegal Gun Sales

Tuesday, December 27th, 2011 at 9:08 AM

Bloomberg’s latest stunt: Even local official admits push for new gun control legislation wouldn’t stop illegal gun sales.
by Jim Irvine and Chad D. Baus

Buckeye Firearms Foundation

Buckeye Firearms Foundation

Ohio --(Ammoland.com)- Last week, anti-gun New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Joyce Foundation-funded gun control group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns (MAIG), staged a press conference to hype the group’s latest effort to institute a new level of gun control on law-abiding citizens. But while he supports the gun control efforts, even the City of Cleveland’s Public Safety Director admits the proposed legislation wouldn’t stop illegal sales.

According to The Washington Post, billionaire Bloomberg spent $290,000 of New York City taxpayers’ money on yet another “undercover investigation” staged far beyond the borders of his city.

In local coverage, The Cleveland Plain Dealer, citing a MAIG press release, reported that “investigators” contacted 27 “unlicensed dealers” in Ohio and found that 10 agreed to sell guns to prospective buyers who said they would likely fail a background check.

Investigators reportedly asked to meet five of the 10 sellers in person, and bought four handguns and an “assault rifle” with cash.

MAIG is using the “investigation,” which was not conducted by law enforcement but rather by private investigators, to argue for passage of legislation which would require background checks for any firearms transaction, even those between private individuals, family members, etc.

From The Cleveland Plain Dealer:

But at least one gun rights advocate in Ohio doesn’t support the legislation.

Jim Irvine, chairman of the Buckeye Firearms Association, said he doesn’t trust Mayors Against Illegal Guns and believes its ultimate goal is to outlaw private gun sales, and eventually ownership, altogether.

Irvine said the Fix Gun Checks Act would simply drive up the cost of gun sales without reducing crime.

“The criminals steal their guns,” he said. “That’s the number one way a criminal gets his gun.”

And as for the gun sellers, if 62 percent of the 125 unlicensed dealers contacted in the investigation are willing to break the law now, who’s to say they won’t still be willing to do so if the law changes, he said.

“They’re still going to sell guns to criminals if that’s what they’re doing,” Irvine said.

Indeed, even as he argued for passage of mandatory background checks, Cleveland Public Safety Director Martin Flask admitted to The Plain Dealer that “a more extensive background check requirement won’t stop street corner sales.”

There are a number of concerns about the latest MAIG press stunt:

  • We’ve seen lots of incorrect information about guns coming from Mayor Bloomberg and MAIG, so how can we have confidence in anything they say/do?
  • They claim that 62% of people agreed to sell guns to criminals. Was this a representative sample or did they pick people known to be likely to break the law?
  • Taking their information at face value – what now? How does their proposed legislation impact violent criminals? We know most criminals steal their guns (not buy them at gun shows or online) so how is does their “solution” solve the crime problem? It does not. It simply drives up the cost of gun ownership.
  • Lots of laws are broken in cars too. If we made every private sale go through a registered car dealer, would that reduce DUI’s, vehicular homicide, speeding, running red lights, failure to maintain assured clear distance? No. It would do nothing to solve “gun crime” either.
  • Gun dealers can only do checks on people to whom they are selling guns. They are in the business of selling guns. Why would they want to pay an employee to stop taking care of paying customers and pay for background checks on a private sale that is potentially taking away a customer?

Instead, this legislation would serve to produce the same results we always get from Bloomberg and company proposals – driving up costs of gun ownership through red tape, hassles, and bureaucracy. The ultimate goal is fewer citizens owning guns. If Bloomberg truly wants to solve the crime problem, he should be looking at criminals.

Indeed, we have some problems with guns and crime in Ohio too – so much so that Attorney General Mike DeWine has formed a task force to address it. DeWine has repeatedly told the committee he wants them to go after the criminal, not the tool. As such, it is likely that whatever comes out of that committee will make a lot more sense, because unlike Bloomberg, DeWine’s stated goal is to reduce crime, not gun ownership.

While the tactics Bloomberg uses are bad enough, it is his hypocrisy that really takes the cake. In a December 7 blog post entitled “Bloomberg’s Private Army,” the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre noted that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg “may have revealed the depth of his ego when was speaking to students at MIT recently.”

During the speech, he proclaimed, “I have my own army in the NYPD, which is the seventh biggest army in the world.”

Maybe the mayor really believes that, but the officers of the NYPD take an oath to the Constitution and the laws of New York, not an oath of fealty to the power-hungry occupier of City Hall. Bloomberg should also remember that a “ruler” (which is what he seems to think he is) who denies the people their Right to Keep and Bear Arms while maintaining a large “army” is apt to be viewed as a petty tyrant, not a benevolent and wise leader.

Bloomberg seems to think that it’s all about him when it comes to the idea of Right-to-Carry holders on college campuses, as well. In that same speech to MIT students, he told them that when he was in college, he and his fellow students were too “smoked up and drunk” to responsibly carry a firearm. Maybe Bloomberg didn’t realize that MIT has one of the finest collegiate rifle programs in the country, as well as an intercollegiate pistol team and a campus Rifle and Pistol Club. Clearly, the mayor should spend less time pontificating about what he thinks about the world, so he could learn something from his audience.

Jim Irvine and Chad D. Baus are the Buckeye Firearms Association Chairman and Vice Chairman.

About:
Buckeye Firearms Association is a grassroots political action committee dedicated to defending and advancing the right of Ohio citizens to own and use firearms for all legal activities. Visit: www.buckeyefirearms.org

Tags: , , , , ,
 Email   Print     
 
People like this. Be the first of your friends.

The “De-Tafting” Of Ohio’s Concealed Carry Laws Is Nearly Complete

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011 at 8:35 AM

The “De-Tafting” Of Ohio’s Concealed Carry Laws Is Nearly Complete
By Gerard Valentino and Jim Irvine

Buckeye Firearms Foundation

Buckeye Firearms Foundation

Ohio --(Ammoland.com)- When Ohio’s concealed carry law passed in 2004, then-Governor Bob Taft made sure to insert poison pills designed to make it nearly impossible for a citizen to carry legally.

It took nearly seven years, but as of, September 30, 2011, the onerous car-carry restrictions that Taft created and that made countless honest Ohioans into felons are being relegated to the political scrap heap.

Ohioans will also be able to carry in restaurants that serve alcohol for consumption, as long as the license holder does not drink and is not under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Attorney General Mike DeWine (R) has created a new 2011 Concealed Carry Laws Manual that lay out the changes that go into effect.

Please take the time to read the updated information so you understand the changes and can avoid running afoul of the new law. Anti-self-defense groups are waiting for license holders to screw up, thus “proving” we don’t deserve our rights. Such problems by any license holder make it difficult to continue to improve our laws for all license holders. A yearly review of firearms laws is a good way to make sure your daily habits are in line with current law.

Buckeye Firearms Association doesn’t anticipate problems, but as with any change in the law, getting the information out to the officer on the street takes time. Please keep that in mind and remember that law enforcement is adjusting to the new law, just as we are. A good attitude and a cooperative demeanor will go a long way toward educating any LEO who has not been properly briefed, and continue to build on the good relationships between law enforcement and citizens who carry firearms for lawful purposes.

The changes that go into effect today are a huge win for the concealed handgun holder. Our laws regarding carrying in an automobile are now consistent with the rest of the country, and the laws regarding carrying in restaurants are similar to the law in over 40 other states. We are given a bit more leeway about the establishment we may carry into, but have a zero consumption rule that most states do not employ. We penalize violations with strict felony provisions, which few if any other states do. Despite the anti-gun zealots promises of “drunks with guns” and a rash of dead police officers, the new concealed carry provisions are reasonable and prudent.

Ohio’s restoration of rights statue has been modified so that it finally meets federal requirements so that people whose rights have been restored in Ohio are no longer under a federal firearms disability. In addition, another change relieves people with non-felony drug convictions from firearm disabilities under Ohio law. Persons with a minor misdemeanor drug charge, but no felonies or criminal record, are now permitted to own guns, but still are not eligible for an Ohio concealed handgun license.

(They may still obtain and fully use other states’ concealed carry licenses, so long as that state does not impose a drug conviction disqualifier.)

The positive changes would not have been possible without the support of the grassroots, otherwise known as average citizens who contacted their elected officials and requested that our laws changed. As we continue our fight to restore rights to all lawful persons, citizen involvement will be key to helping legislators understand how important the changes we seek are to their constituents.

We have received many requests for gatherings with fellow gun owners to commemorate the change in the law. Buckeye Firearms is not sanctioning these events, but several of us will be participating at various locations. Individuals can network with others for friendly locations to enjoy dinner and spend some money on our forums:

http://forums.buckeyefirearms.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12410

Ohio 2011 Concealed Carry Laws Booklet

Jim Irvine is the Buckeye Firearms Association Chairman. Gerard Valentino is a member of the Buckeye Firearms Foundation Board of Directors.

About:
Buckeye Firearms Association is a grassroots political action committee dedicated to defending and advancing the right of Ohio citizens to own and use firearms for all legal activities. Visit: www.buckeyefirearms.org

Tags: , ,
 Email   Print     
  1. Login with Facebook:
    Log In
    Powered by Sociable!
  2. Facebook Activity