Two Visions – The Nativity vs. the Occupiers

By Dr. Paul Kengor
Editor’s note: A version of this article first appeared in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

The Pittsburgh Creche
Two Visions: The Nativity vs. the Occupiers
The Center For Vision & Values
The Center For Vision & Values

Grove City, PA –-(Ammoland.com)- I recently strolled down Grant Street in downtown Pittsburgh and was struck by two images.

First, there was the stirring life-sized Nativity that each year is displayed on the property of the giant U.S. Steel building. It is an inspiring sight.

As I walked along, however, my eyes were distracted by something I was not prepared to see: an assembling of tents with an entrance sign declaring not “Hark!” or “Gloria in Excelsis Deo” but “Abolish Capitalism.”

The tents constituted Pittsburgh’s mini-version of Occupy Wall Street. It was “Occupy Pittsburgh.” Yes, right there at the core of the Steel City that literally won world wars and built America through capitalism.

The two images —the Nativity vs. Occupy Pittsburgh— are a stark contrast. They were separated by maybe 100 feet of space, but by light years in worldview. The Nativity is the true symbol of Christmas, of course—an attempt to recapture the real meaning of the secularized season. The Occupy Movement, on the other hand, is intensely secular, despite its small presence of “social justice” Christians.

Both symbols, however, share one thing in common: they are testimonies to the excesses of the extreme Left.

Consider first the Occupy movement: The Occupiers define themselves as against Wall Street specifically and big business and big banks and “corporate greed” generally. I don’t want emails from people telling me the Occupiers have a point here and there. Let’s not be fools. This is a self-professed, staunchly far-left movement rooted in anti-capitalism. Read their blogs, watch their interviews, look at their manifestos, stop by one of their outposts, read about their crimes and destruction of property —including (speaking of the Nativity) their smashing of a statue of Mary.

Their message is unmistakable.

I’m most troubled by certain elements of the Religious Left hooking up with the Occupiers. For 100 years, far-left atheists who despise religion, who have relentlessly mocked and persecuted Christians and people of all faiths, have successfully recruited the Religious Left to their rallies under the rubric of economic and social justice—like sheep led to the slaughter. Believe me, I research it, I write books about it. The Occupy movement’s ability to attract the Religious Left is just the latest example of a century of cynical and remarkable political exploitation.

The folks at the Occupy protests in cities nationwide are the same who for decades have busily filed lawsuits to have Ten Commandments and crèche displays removed from courthouses. And that brings me back to that giant Nativity scene.

The Pittsburgh Nativity is a powerful response to what happened in the city some 20 years ago. In 1989, the Supreme Court took the case of the County of Allegheny v. the ACLU, where it considered the constitutionality of a Nativity scene and Menorah that for years happily resided on public property at two adjacent county buildings. Pittsburghers embraced both symbols; after all, it was Christmas and Hanukkah.

The ACLU, however, recoiled at the sight, and rushed ahead with a law suit.

The court ruled on July 3, 1989, the day before Independence Day, when Americans commemorate the inalienable rights endowed to them and their nation by their Creator. It ruled that the Nativity violated the Constitution’s Establishment Clause.

The court case is historic, if not infamous. Not as familiar is the corrective now sitting aside the U.S. Steel building.

In 1999, 10 years after the court ruling, a group of inspired Christian leaders got together and erected the Pittsburgh Crèche, the world’s only authorized replica of the crèche in St. Peter’s Square in Rome, constructed from plans by Vatican architect Umberto Mezzana. It features truly larger-than-life renderings of the Holy Family. It sits gloriously at 600 Grant Street, a few hundred yards down the road from the county buildings where the ACLU fought a tiny little crèche. Baby Jesus rests on private property, where secularists can’t evict him.

Ironically, the bad economy that has spurred Occupy Pittsburgh has taken a toll on the Pittsburgh Crèche. The endowment funding the crèche is dwindling fast, leaving the Pittsburgh Diocese with the task of raising a pile of money—money that, like the property protecting the crèche, must be provided by the private sector, not the government.

Alas, there are two symbols positioned side-by-side in Pittsburgh, perhaps providentially. They represent two visions. One demands the abolition of capitalism; it is a sign of anger and despair. The other brings us goodness and light. If the Occupiers want hope, the answer isn’t in Washington or Wall Street but in the humble manger within their reach. They have a lot of time on their hands. I suggest a stroll down the street.

— Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values. His books include “God and Ronald Reagan,” “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism,” and his latest release, “Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century.”

  • 2 thoughts on “Two Visions – The Nativity vs. the Occupiers

    1. In that stark contrast is vision and dream of justice and peace that existing religious tradition [nor political process] have never provided the means to realize for a humanity which needs it now more than ever and which many are still demonstrating for. Having the dream without the means is a reflection of the human condition yet to be resolved, especially by any development of firepower ever invented. http://www.energon.org.uk

    2. I have to question two of your assertions concerning atheists: 1) that there is any sort of organization or collusion between atheists or 2) that we have actively persecuted anyone.

      I happen to be an atheist and have maybe had 3 or 4 conversations with folks who actually agree with my position concerning religion. That has been for maybe the last 10 years or so. Before that I didn't really have an opinion or at least the courage of my convictions.

      But now I'm willing to stand up in public and tell people I'm an atheist if asked. I couldn't care less whether you agree with me or not. In fact, I fully expect you not to agree. But it doesn't matter. I think religion is all superstition and bullshit. You are equally certain that I'm wrong and will go to hell for my ideas. Neither of us is ever going to convince the other that they are correct.

      As for persecuting, you give me way more power and influence that I actually enjoy. Hey, *I'm* the one who is in the minority. I don't get to make the rules. Your claim of being persecuted by people like me is specious.

    Comments are closed.