New York Times Offers Most Stupid Anti-Gun Argument Yet

Gun Rights Examiner David Codrea
Gun Rights Examiner David Codrea

USA –-(Ammoland.com)- “The House showed its utter disregard for public safety in November when it approved the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act, which would take away the authority of states to decide who is allowed to carry a concealed and loaded handgun within their borders,” The New York Times shrieked in a Tuesday editorial.

Relying on a hit piece against concealed carriers by “reporter” Michael Luo that yielded the unintended consequence of instead proving “they are remarkably law-abiding,” The Times is once more in a frenzy to ensure that only the “Only Ones,” to include the well-connected elite, retain the ability to defend themselves and loved ones from personal attack in the Big Apple.

And to do so, they present the following bit of hysteria…

Continue reading on Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-national/new-york-times-offers-most-stupid-anti-gun-argument-yet

About David Codrea:
David Codrea is a long-time gun rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He is a field editor for GUNS Magazine, and a blogger at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance. Read more at www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-national/david-codrea

  • One thought on “New York Times Offers Most Stupid Anti-Gun Argument Yet

    Leave a Comment 1 Comment