How Are Gun Rights God-Given And Inalienable?

AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

Washington DC – -(Ammoland.com)- Last week, in pointing out the problems with Jill Lepore’s attempt to undermine the Second Amendment and justify more gun control, I focused on the fact that our right to keep and bear arms is a God-given right.

As such, it preceded not only the Second Amendment but also the founding of the United States.

In other words: We don’t have the right to keep and bear arms because the Bill of Rights says so; rather, the Bill of Rights says so because the right to keep and bear arms is intrinsic to our very being: it is a right with which we were endowed by our Creator.

In response to this point, someone emailed and asked for an explanation regarding the claim that this right is “God-given.” Far from being argumentative, the individual simply stated that he could not find any explicit reference to the right to keep and bear arms in the Bible and wondered where the justification was for claiming that God himself endowed us with such a right.

The email raised a great question. And the short answer is that part of the foundation for keeping and bearing arms rests in laws that lend order to nature. These are laws that God ordained and implemented just as certainly as he implemented and ordained the moral law (the 10 Commandments). This point is worth explaining because it’s fundamental to an understanding of how our inalienable rights flow to us from God rather than from government. As such, the foundation of those rights transcends government, which is why the right to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed.”

There are two sets of law authored and maintained by God: Divine Law, consisting of the 10 Commandments and the outworking of those commandments in the New Testament, and Natural Law, consisting of the order intrinsic to nature and the universe around it. We know Divine Law from reading the Bible, and we know aspects of Natural Law because it is written upon our hearts and consciences. The Apostle Paul indicated this in Romans 2:14-15: “When Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness.”

And because Divine Law and Natural Law both flow from God, they are in agreement with one another. Thus, whereas Divine Law teaches “Thou shall not kill,” Natural Law provides us with the intuitive knowledge that killing in cold blood is wrong. And whereas Divine Law teaches “Thou shall not steal,” Natural Law provides us with the intuitive knowledge that stealing is wrong. This explains why people who have never read a Bible or heard a sermon on the Bible do their stealing in secret or in the cover of night — for they have an intuitive knowledge that it’s something that must be hidden.

Yet it goes much deeper. For the same laws of nature of that warn our consciences against killing in cold blood or stealing, also incline us toward owning our own things and protecting the things we own. And perhaps most importantly, they also teach that our greatest property is our own life, and that such a property must be defended. In fact, because God has given us life, we have a duty to defend it.

When enlightenment philosopher John Locke wrote his great exposition on Natural Law in “Two Treatises of Government,” he made these points clearly:

The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise Maker; all the servants of one sovereign master, sent into the world by his order.

And of those who violate the laws of nature and act criminally toward their fellow man:

In transgressing the law of nature, the offender declares himself to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity, which is that measure God has set to the actions of men, for their mutual security; and so he becomes dangerous to mankind.

Locke went on to explain that nature teaches us that once a man is proven dangerous to us, we are justified in using force, including lethal force, to remove the danger and protect our lives. He even contended that someone who commits a lesser violation of those laws — for instance, theft — may justly face lethal force even if he means me no physical harm, for he is attempting “to get me into his power,” and having done that, he may go further.

This is how Locke put it:

This makes it lawful for a man to kill a thief who has not in the least hurt him, nor declared any design upon his life, any farther than by the use of force, so to get him in his power as to take away his money, or what he pleases, from him; because using force, where he has no right to get me into his power, let his pretence be what it will, I have no reason to suppose that he who would take away my liberty would not, when he had me in his power, take away everything else.

The bottom line: The gift of life is inalienable, coming to us from God through nature. And the right to defend that life is also inalienable because it comes to us from God through nature as well.

AWR Hawkins
AWR Hawkins

About:
AWR Hawkins writes for all the BIG sites, for Pajamas Media, for RedCounty.com, for Townhall.com and now AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.

His southern drawl is frequently heard discussing his take on current events on radio shows like America's Morning News, the G. Gordon Liddy Show, the Ken Pittman Show, and the NRA's Cam & Company, among others. He was a Visiting Fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal (summer 2010), and he holds a PhD in military history from Texas Tech University.

If you have questions or comments, email him at [email protected] You can find him on facebook at www.facebook.com/awr.hawkins.

12
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
11 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
Lucien J. LadnerjohnRon RobinsonCasper RigsbyMikeb302000 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
john
Guest
john

you keep turning the other cheek and you will be destined for a gas furnace ,as history has depicted,your choice???

Ron Robinson
Guest
Ron Robinson

Let me get this straight. The 2nd amendment is to be followed word for word, but the “Thou shalt not kill” thing means thou shalt not kill unless you have a good reason?

Lucien J. Ladner
Guest
Lucien J. Ladner

The correct word for kill is translated as MURDER. Check the true definitions of Bible words in ancient greek, hewbrew or aramaic (sp?). In addition, take in the whole verse and the intent of the writer (know your hisotry).
Do some research (non-demonational) on the times and beliefs during ancient times.

Casper Rigsby
Guest
Casper Rigsby

As a Christian you are supposed to be a follower of Christ, not the bible. Christ gave his followers the message that if someone offers to bring violence and harm to you it is your DUTY to turn the other cheek. If you truly believe you are righteous and deserving of heaven then this life is but a waypoint to a greater one after death. Those who would take up arms in defense of themselves fear death and as such show that they are lacking in faith. Remember that the bible says that vengeance belongs to God alone and when… Read more »

Mikeb302000
Guest

This is one of those "If you agree no explanation is necessary, if you don't agree no explanation is possible" kinda things.

The way I look at it is this.

1. right to life

2. right to self-defense

3. right to own and carry a particular inanimate object called a gun.

The absurd jump from number two to number three takes the kind of spinning and justifying you gave us in this post.

Bravo.

Bob Moore
Guest
Bob Moore

AWR Hawkins, Thank you for this excellent article. It clearly states what I have been trying to say for some time.

I think this naturally leads into a next article, that discusses the next few sentences in the Declaration of Independence. The founders stated in those few sentences why a government should protect the people's "certain inalienable rights", and why a government that does not, should be over-thrown by the people.

Bob Moore
Guest
Bob Moore

Agreeing with the previous comment from woodyb, and expanding on it. Anyone with a reasonable mind must acknowledge that there are certain "natural laws", including the ones mentioned previously about right to life and right to self-defense. Whether one believes these natural laws were established by God (the Creator), or were accidentally created as part of some evolutionary process, is irrelevant. These "natural laws" do exist and they should be followed. Natural Law is not taught in our schools anymore. Why? Because Progressives know that they simply could not succeed in attacking our Constitutional rights, if the people knew that… Read more »

theaton
Guest

Our rights, including the right to keep and bear arms, are not "God-Given." Our founding fathers new words were important and they also new about God and how to spell it. With rights, they used Creator. Why? Because you do not need to believe in a god to have rights. You do not need to believe in a god to defend those rights. Hell, many firearms owners believe in God and we haven't defended shit in 80+ years!

woodyb
Guest
woodyb

While this isn't an all inclusive list, it will give the seeker a good start at the Biblicle truth about God's commands to carry and use weapons.

Psalms 149:6-9

Exodus 22:2-3

Matthew 24:43

Luke 11:21

Luke 22:36

1 Timothy 5:8

May God grant You wisdom.

Ken
Guest
Ken

May I suggest a more simple translation. Do you have a right to live? Yes. Do you have the right to defend your life if someone tries to take it? Yes. Do you have the right to use a tool to protect your life? Yes. Case closed.

Dale
Guest
Dale

As an individual who tries to be a follower of Christ and a permit to carry holder, this topic is one that I have thought a lot about. The Reverend Brian Abshire (in 2008) wrote a great article titled "The Bible and Self-Defense" that is a great read for anyone interested in this topic. In addition, Pope John Paul II's EVANGELIUM VITAE, Encyclical Letter from 1995 covers the topic of self defense. In it he writes "Certainly, the intrinsic value of human life and the duty to love oneself no less than others are the basis of a true right… Read more »

Robert Mouncey
Guest
Robert Mouncey

When the sixth commandment is translated to english it reads MURDER thou shalt not commit.