Guns and Moses

Original article from New Jersey Jewish News.
by Andrew Silow-Carroll
NJJN Editor-in-Chief

Jews For The Preservation Of Firearms Ownership
Jews For The Preservation Of Firearms Ownership

Washington, DC –-( At a synagogue talk a few weeks ago, a member of the audience asked me why Jews seem to be disproportionately in favor of gun control.

I gave a quick and I thought not-bad answer: Jews have no real cultural history of hunting and an ambivalent relationship with military service.

Kosher-keeping Jews can’t eat an animal that isn’t slaughtered according to kashrut. As for hunting for sport, Rabbi Ezekiel Landau of Prague (18th century) wrote that killing an animal in order to satisfy “the enjoyable use of [a person’s] time” is “sheer cruelty.” As Rabbi Joseph Telushkin explains, Landau’s response has long been considered the “normative Jewish position on hunting.”

As for military service, Jews have a long and proud history as soldiers. Don’t get a Jewish war vet or an Israeli soldier started on the idea that Jews don’t fight.

But the Jewish relationship with the military has always been rocky. Immigrants fled Russia to escape forced conscription for terms of two decades and more. The military could also be a hotbed of anti-Semitism, as Dreyfus learned so memorably. Through much of the last century, Jews in the U.S. military academies spoke of their struggles for acceptance.

I find these sorts of “cultural DNA” arguments very satisfying. Of course, I don’t “get” guns or why anyone who isn’t a hunter or a jeweler would want to own one. For folks on the other side, this isn’t culture – it’s intransigence. Last month I was sent a copy of “Why Jews Hate Guns,” written by Rabbi Dovid Bendory of Livingston and Alan Korwin on behalf of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. The paper is dripping with disdain for the Jews, who, “with such a stunning history of oppression and murder by humanity’s villains,” nevertheless “hate guns and fear gun ownership.”

The authors list the mindsets they believe contribute to Jewish “hoplophobia(which, I learned, is an irrational fear of guns). These include a “desire for utopian moral purity,” an embrace of victimhood, and that old standby: self-hatred.

The authors also find justification for gun ownership in the Torah. Unable to face reality, misguided Jews embrace Isaiah: “They shall beat their spears into pruning hooks.” The authors much prefer Talmud, Berachot 58b: “If a man comes to kill you, rise early and kill him first.”

In fact, there is a gun culture among segments of Modern Orthodox Jews. The One Israel Fund and the Teaneck-based Golani Rifle and Pistol Club hold an annual “Guns and Beef Night” (which I like to call “Glock and Glatt”). Bendory gives shooting lessons to fellow Orthodox Jews.

Bendory and Korwin also hold with a belief, prominent in conservative circles, that many members of the non-Orthodox Jewish majority are “Jews In Name Only.” These “JINOs,” they write, “have replaced their previous religion with a popular new one: so-called social justice.’”

It’s the same point made by Norman Podhoretz in his 2009 book Why Are Jews Liberals? The “Orthodox oppose the politically correct liberal positions taken by most other American Jews precisely because these positions conflict with Jewish law,” wrote Podhoretz.

These debates over guns and politics raise a more fundamental question: Who is a Jew? One side dismisses polls showing Jewish support for Democrats by saying many of those Jews have, for all intents and purposes, stopped being Jews, at least as measured by the positive Jewish choices they make in their lives. The other side looks at the conservative minority and wonders how they can engage in behaviors so “un-Jewish”: voting Republican, toting guns, allying with Evangelical Christians. I am always surprised by the degree to which highly assimilated Jews still hold onto the idea of “goyische naches” – that is, the things only gentiles do.

The culture that gave rise to Jewish liberalism is not Judaism “in name only,” unless you are willing to write off the last 150 years or so of Jewish culture, politics, and social activism as a historical blip. Yes, many Jews defined themselves over those decades in terms of the causes they took on, from the labor movement to civil rights to secular Zionism. But they did so with a deep indebtedness to their Jewish identities. Even in a period of decline – and surveys show non-Orthodox movements in retreat – the conflation of Judaism and liberalism persists, certainly enough to frustrate Podhoretz and the Jewish pro-gun lobby.

Thus, some conservatives did a victory lap after last week’s release of the New York Jewish population survey, which showed huge gains by the fervently Orthodox community and declines among the non-Orthodox movements.

“There’s little doubt this means the Jewish community of the future will be far less liberal,” wrote Commentary’s Jonathan Tobin.

I agree that we are going to lose a lot more non-Orthodox Jews and secular Jewish culture before the assimilationist trend bottoms out. But I also think the cultural patterns that gave rise to Jewish liberalism are a powerful force and will continue to be transmitted despite the generational drift. Whether that force survives or fades depends on the will and ability of non-Orthodox Jews to assert their Jewishness and make the choices that assure there will be young Jews like them. To those who care deeply about Judaism in all its varieties, I say: Stick to your guns!

Andrew Silow-Carroll is Editor-in-Chief of the New Jersey Jewish News. Between columns you can read his writing at the JustASC blog.

Jews For The Preservation Of Firearms Ownership Mission is to destroy “gun control” and to encourage Americans to understand and defend all of the Bill of Rights for everyone. Those are the twin goals of Wisconsin-based Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO). Founded by Jews and initially aimed at educating the Jewish community about the historical evils that Jews have suffered when they have been disarmed, JPFO has always welcomed persons of all religious beliefs who share a common goal of opposing and reversing victim disarmament policies while advancing liberty for all.

JPFO is a non-profit tax-exempt educational civil rights organization, not a lobby. JPFO's products and programs reach out to as many segments of the American people as possible, using bold tactics without compromise on fundamental principles. Visit – Copyright JPFO 2011

  • 2 thoughts on “Guns and Moses

    1. There is a DNA basis for most Jews’ disdain for weapons. After the destruction of the Second Temple (70 Common Era), Jews lived under repressive regimes: the Roman Empire, the Muslim caliphates (the Middle East and North Africa); the Persian Empire; the Russian Empire; the Holy Roman Empire (and its successors), etc.

      Over nearly 1,900 years (60-70 generations), Jews – who stood-up for themselves against their oppressors – were weeded-out, i.e., murdered. Jews survived, if only by the skins of their teeth, by being humble and submissive, by “going along” with their oppressors. In general, any resort to arms would have been catastrophic, because Jews were almost always a tiny minority in the various lands of their exile.

      The result: by the eve of the Second World War, most Jews saw weapons as simply not relevant. Even those, who came to the United States, did not see why they should avail themselves of firearms, which were easily obtained.

      Jews, who continue to shun weapons, are culpable, because they are blind to a key lesson of the 20th Century: there is no public policy that does more to promote genocide, than does “gun control”. Anyone, who reads “Lethal Laws”: Gun Control is the Key to Genocide”, will understand this.

      Intellectual blindness often is lethal. It leads to the doing of things that should not be tried.

      The true miracle of Israel’s return to the map has its roots in Warsaw, Poland’s capital. There, starting on Erev Pesach (Passover), 1943, Jews took up arms against the Nazis. Even though the Nazis won, an inevitable outcome, the Battle of the Warsaw Ghetto (not an uprising, which term suggests illegality) proved that Jews could wage war. Without Warsaw, there would be no Israel: no one else was going to fight to defend the fledgling State of Israel.

      Even so, most Jews do not embrace the ownership of weapons. Their DNA militates against it. Many of these Jews’ submissiveness is so ingrained, that they use to describe the Nazi genocide, a deeply anti-Semitic term: “Holocaust”. This term means “to sacrifice by fire”. The Law Moses brought down at Sinai enjoins Jews from even the appearance of human sacrifice. That this viciously anti-Semitic term is widely used, especially by Jews, must give pleasure to the remaining Nazis, who so well understood, and so successfully manipulated, their victims.

      In sum, most Jews’ support for “gun contol” results from 1,900 years of “genetic engineering” by Jews’ enemies. This toxic legacy will burden Jews for a long time.

    2. No. “Liberal Jews” is a deceiving label, considering that most of the original immigrants were either socialists or out-and-out communists. Remember Ethel and Julius?

      The liberal poison of the “Jewish Community”, originally centered in New York City, continues to metastasize into Florida as NYC retirees seek the warmer climate.

      I have a request: Buy a space heater and STAY IN NEW YORK.

      We neither need nor want your termite-like disintegration of our founding principles here.

      At the very least, if you do come here, DON’T VOTE.


    Leave a Comment 2 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *