Chris Cox, Executive Director of the NRA-ILA, Tells U.S. Senate Oppose DISCLOSE Act

By Chris W. Cox

Chris Cox
Chris Cox

FAIRFAX, Va. –-(  Dear Senator,

I am writing to express the National Rifle Association’s strong opposition to S. 3369, the DISCLOSE Act.

In its landmark Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the federal ban on certain political speech by nonprofit membership associations, including the National Rifle Association.  In an effort to mischaracterize that ruling as something other than a vindication of the free speech and associational rights of millions of American citizens, some have repeatedly attempted to effectively reverse or significantly limit the scope of Citizens United.  The latest attempt in this regard is S. 3369.

The NRA has been around since 1871.  Our members contribute for the purpose of speaking during elections and participating in the political process.  We will not risk our Association or our members being silenced at election time, as S. 3369 would do, while the national news media, politicians, and others are allowed to attack us at will. The NRA is a bipartisan, single-issue organization made up of millions of individual members dedicated to the protection of the Second Amendment. The NRA stands absolutely obligated to our members to ensure maximum access to the First Amendment, in order to protect and preserve the freedom of the Second Amendment.

Among the many problems with the DISCLOSE Act are its unconstitutional disclosure provisions.  These provisions require organizations to turn membership and donor lists over to the government.  Under the First Amendment, however, as recognized in a long line of Supreme Court cases, citizens have the right to speak and associate privately and anonymously.

Further, the DISCLOSE Act creates byzantine administrative burdens that will suffocate individual citizen associations.  The Court in Citizens United was clear: “As additional rules are created for regulating political speech, any speech arguably within their reach is chilled.”  This bill attacks nearly all of an association’s political speech by creating an arbitrary patchwork of unprecedented tracking and disclosure requirements.  Nonprofit associations would have to track the political priorities of each of its individual members.  The cost of complying with these requirements will be immense; for many associations, they may prohibit speaking altogether.  That violates both the spirit and the letter of the First Amendment.

In addition, S. 3369 would give the FEC the power to require the NRA to reveal private, internal discussions with its millions of members about political communications.  This unnecessary and burdensome requirement would leave it to government officials to make a determination about the type and volume of speech that would trigger potential criminal penalties, which is unacceptable.

Recent media accounts of retaliation against certain political donors reveal the true intent behind this legislation.  It is not simply a “disclosure bill”, as its authors claim.  Rather, it is a not-so-transparent attempt to rend Citizens United into a legal nullity, by chilling the very speech rights that were restored in that landmark decision.

Due to the importance of the fundamental speech and associational rights of the National Rifle Association’s four million members, and considering the blatant attack on those rights that S. 3369 represents, we strongly oppose the DISCLOSE Act and will consider votes on this legislation in future candidate evaluations.

Chris W. Cox

About NRA

Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America’s oldest civil rights and sportsmen’s group. Four million members strong, NRA continues its mission to uphold Second Amendment rights and to advocate enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation’s leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the military. Visit:

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Mr. Cox, I just read your entries in the April 2015 American Rifleman. You are making the same mistakes as the NRA. The 2nd Amendment can be protected by fighting for principle, never for pragmatic. This is why Bloomberg and his ilk are slowly winning, and in the long run will “win.”

Some years ago a submission of principle to American Rifleman was rejected by American Hunter. Phony rejections do not guard principle.

“An error occurred” at first and second submission attempt using IE10. Trying Chrome – “An error occurred.”

Trying this to:

James Noteman

Chris, Was unable to find your direct e-mail address but wanted to send my sincere thank you to you for coming and speaking at our Friday Night Dinner for Safari Club International. Your speech was so inspiring to me that I kept my promise. I soon as I got home I called two days later and have renewed my membership. I should have never let it lapse in the first place, sorry. But things happen as you well know working in Washington. So glad that we have people like you in positions that you have that care. If I can… Read more »