Columbus, OH –-(Ammoland.com)- There are many forces in America working to end trapping and wise wildlife management.
Here are a few of those anti-trapping groups:
- Sierra Club—this group’s board of directors has let America know it opposes any and all trapping—period. The official Sierra Club statement reads: “The Sierra Club considers body-gripping, restraining and killing traps and snares to be ecologically indiscriminate and unnecessarily inhumane and therefore opposes their use.” This position earns this group a No. 1 spot.
- PETA—best known for being wackos, this group opposes fur, trapping, and anything non-vegan. PETA also wanted to “trap” and euthanize problem hogs in Florida to prevent them from being hunted.
- Humane Society of the United States—this radical animal rights group lists trapping as wildlife abuse. This group is currently being sued for violation of federal racketeering laws.
- American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (alias ASPCA)—states openly on its website that “The ASPCA is against the use of leg-hold or body-gripping traps to capture wild animals because of the pain and distress that they cause.” The group also opposes hunting.
- Defenders of Wildlife—this group opposes wolf hunting and trapping and launched an aggressive online campaign to skew an Idaho wolf trapping survey in its favor. DoW reported it had 39,000 followers overwhelm the Idaho Game and Fish Commission’s website.
- Born Free USA—this radical animal rights group labels trapping as “barbaric” and has a trapping victims fund to help cover veterinarian costs for animals—including wildlife—caught in traps. It distributes a free “How to Organize an Anti-Trapping Campaign” booklet through its Animal Protection Institute group.
- In Defense of Animals—opposes trapping and has created a “furkills” website to promote the group’s propaganda—and to collect funds. The group also encourages followers to create a display in their local public library to display leaflets, posters, and books about the cruelty involved in trapping or leg-hold traps.
- Animal Welfare Institute- Opposes trapping and is pushing the Refuge from Cruel Trapping Act in Congress to end trapping on national wildlife refuges. Filed a lawsuit in 2008 to stop coyote and fox trapping in Maine under the guise of protecting Canada lynx.
- Center for Biological Diversity: has campaigns underway to stop wolf trapping and hunting in Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho, and another in New Mexico to save Mexican gray wolves. Some of the group’s “urgent letters of action” also include requests for donations to end trapping.
- Footloose Montana—works to oppose wolf trapping and the management of these large predators in Montana while other wildlife species, like elk, dwindle in numbers at the hands, or paws, of wolves. Also works to end trapping on public lands.
Trapping plays an important role in sound wildlife management practices and helps numerous wildlife species, including songbirds and waterfowl populations. As you can tell, trappers and hunters need to work together to overcome these radical forces.
The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance’s watchdog efforts protect hunters’ rights and the interests of anglers, trappers and recreational shooters in the courts, legislatures, at the ballot, in Congress, and through many public education programs. The USSA has more than 170,000 registered Sentries that regularly receive information about conservation issues, and then they actively work to promote and protect scientific conservation through calls and contacts. For more information about the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance and the Sentry program, call (614) 888-4868 or visit: www.ussportsmen.org.
I think trapping and hunting have its pros and cons. Some people are trying to help wildlife but sometimes they are unconsciously destroying it instead. That is why we should make the right choices.