DHS Target Supplier Includes Pregnant Women & Old Men For Target Practice

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com

DHS Target Supplier Includes Pregnant Women & Old Men For Target Practice
DHS Target Supplier Includes Pregnant Women & Old Men For Target Practice
InfoWars
InfoWars

USA –-(Ammoland.com)- A provider of “realistic” shooting targets to the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies has created a line of “non-traditional threat” targets that include pregnant women, mothers in playgrounds and elderly American gun owners.

Law Enforcement Targets, Inc. is a 21-year designer and full service provider of training targets for the DHS, the Justice Department and thousands of law enforcement agencies throughout the country.

The company’s website offers a line of “No More Hesitation” targets ”designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training.” The targets are, “meant to help the transition for officers who are faced with these highly unusual targets for the first time.”

The targets include “pregnant woman threat,” “older man with shotgun,” “older man in home with shotgun,” “older woman with gun,” “young school aged girl,” “young mother on playground,” and “little boy with real gun.”

Why are top training target suppliers for the government supplying the likes of the DHS with “non-traditional threat” targets of children, pregnant women, mothers in playgrounds, and elderly American gun owners unless there is a demand for such items?

Read More: http://www.infowars.com/dhs-supplier-provides-shooting-targets-of-american-gun-owners

  • 29
    Leave a Reply

    Please Login to comment
    26 Comment threads
    3 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    24 Comment authors
    Col BullSighlarry millerBillPatrickfranco Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Bill
    Guest
    Bill

    I just check the Law Enforcement Targets, Inc. web site for “No More Hesitation” targets and they were nowhere to be found. Can anyone say Cover Up?

    Patrick
    Guest
    Patrick

    Perhaps you all need to use targets of police and the like, so you don’t hesitate when they come to murder you, without due process. Hypothetically speaking or course.

    franco
    Guest
    franco

    I met a couple of guys at a mcd’s wearing full military gear, armed to the hilt wearing body armor and driving military Humvee with DHS patches. Both were young physically fit and well educated. While polite they were very secretive when I asked them what they were doing. I think the government is trying to scare us into civil obedience. They know we are well armed and unhappy with the way things are going and it wouldn’t take much for a total meltdown of society to get triggered. They know that an Arab spring in the USA has the… Read more »

    Col BullSigh
    Guest
    Col BullSigh

    DaveGinOly–So what you are saying is that NO ONE except the police are expected to use their legally carried firearms in response to a terrorist threat or even when cops are 20 minutes late to a burglary and the mom is concerned that ANOTHER flashlight and gun wielding obummer-voter scumbag is looking for her to disarm and rape her. So you say she IS NOT supposed to assume a defense stance against the blinding light which does not allow her to see a badge? Give me a break, Fidel/Adolf/Benito/Josef (take your pick)!

    Dan
    Guest
    Dan

    The ugly…

    http://interceder.net/latest_news/Colville-School-District

    A couple of things…

    1. A few of the posters here just can’t seem to stick with the issue and resort to, what appears to this reader as the tantrums of an ignorant and psychotic child. Let’s try to stick with the issue at hand.

    2. Pregnant women have tried to kill cops, in South Carolina for example.

    Arizona, next time that you want to threaten people online, a least show that your not a poser by publishing your address.

    tankhunter
    Guest
    tankhunter

    Any targets of rogue cops for the LAPD to use?

    DaveGinOly
    Guest
    DaveGinOly

    BTW, Arizona, the last time someone threatened me online, he was local. I told him where to find me, and when to find me there. He didn’t show up. I know, because I was there. I suspect that if you were local, you’d be a no show too. Running your mouth at people you don’t know is extremely unwise.

    DaveGinOly
    Guest
    DaveGinOly

    Arizona – Really? I did nothing but state the facts about why these types of targets are popular with LE and civilian shooters and you’re going to threaten me? BTW, I’m not an “asshole in blue,” you moron. Not an LEO here and you couldn’t pay me to be one, because then I’d have to deal with people like you, for whom I have no patience. Some day when a 12 year old child pulls a gun on you in the street, you may have a flash of understanding just as he puts a bullet in your head. You’ll wish… Read more »

    DaveGinOly
    Guest
    DaveGinOly

    I posted the following response to this article at WND.com. Ammoland should be more careful than to cite something like this from Alex Jones’ site. Sometimes he’s right, sometimes he’s wrong, but even when he’s right, he presents his material in a near-hysterical manner and does not do credit to many of us who love our country and our Constitution. ****** I can’t believe this. This is part of a conspiracy? This is nothing but good training. Not all people who may point a weapon at you are large, menacing, white people in wife-beaters or black gangbangers in quilted parkas.… Read more »

    Dan
    Guest
    Dan

    Mannie, good call.

    Years ago during a stress-filled low light training shoot I hesitated on a young female target with a pistol in her right hand aimed at me. Then I was ready to drop a man holding a small calking gun. Lesson learned? I was looking at the face and profile, not the hands.

    I’m no fan of the increased militarization of many aspects of our government – nor do i offer my experience as that of an expert; far from it – but this seems more like the ugly reality that lawmen might face.

    Peter Geller
    Guest
    Peter Geller

    Hey Mannie, Try reading the article. These are targets for them to learn to shoot “unfamiliar” targets. What do you think that means? Maybe you need a tinfoil hat…..just because you’re not paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you either….

    Bill Baker
    Guest
    Bill Baker

    I hope they aren’t discriminating, is their a disabled vet target?

    NotClauswitz
    Guest

    Maybe they could hit a pickup-sized target a couple times…

    Alan
    Guest
    Alan

    Mannie – about these being no-shoot targets – wish it were true, but did you even look at the photo? It shows a young pregnant female POINTING A GUN at the viewer. If you can think of an explanation other than desensitization to potential targets that would normally get some deference, please explain.

    Paul
    Guest
    Paul

    I supposed those could be called “Lon Horiuchi Practice Targets”. (look it up)

    Paul
    Guest
    Paul

    If you don’t understand the significance, please read “On Killing” by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman

    Sean
    Guest
    Sean

    Next series includes newborn, toddler, bed-ridden grandmother on oxygen, and quadriplegic in mouth tube controlled wheelchair.

    Mannie
    Guest
    Mannie

    Come on, take off the tinfoil hats, guys. I’m about as anti DHS Puke as anyone, but . . .

    Have you ever done tactical Shoot-No Shoot drills? Or heard of them? You’re presented with glimpses of a variety of targets. Some you shoot, others, you don’t shoot. Those are No Shoot targets.

    If those gummint mopes are going to be running around with guns, I WANT them to do those drills.

    theBuckWheat
    Guest
    theBuckWheat

    Is big government evil yet or does it get even more brazen? (Yes, and yes)

    J.M.
    Guest
    J.M.

    Where’s the target of family dog with wagging tail?

    Haiku Guy
    Guest
    Haiku Guy

    In case you wondered
    How your government sees you.
    You are a target.

    askeptic
    Guest
    askeptic

    Must desensitize the shock-troops.

    J'hn1
    Guest
    J'hn1

    And they are all white.
    Like the most likely opponents this federal government feels they will be facing.

    A. C.
    Guest
    A. C.

    Reminds me of the scene in the first “Men In Black” movie where James Edwards (Will Smith) shoots the little caucasian girl carrying the physics books walking at night in the ghetto. Unfortunately, DHS isn’t a supersecret super agency charged with keeping track of space aliens. Instead, this reinforces the notion that those people are sick.

    Dave
    Guest
    Dave

    Do they have 71 year old Hispanic female news carrier targets?

    dwdude
    Guest
    dwdude

    that’s o k…i’ve been using targets of federal officials, union thugs and dhs agents to practice for years…

    Steven Den Beste
    Guest

    I bet all the people in those targets are white.

    larry miller
    Guest
    larry miller

    its because these targets are meant to represent (non) traditional threats

    Col BullSigh
    Guest
    Col BullSigh

    Not ONE rag-head or criminal alien in the bunch! A fine job you’ve done for America, obummer a$$hole!