Boston Marathon Bombers Broke Gun Laws to Acquire Weapons

By AWR Hawkins

Boston Marathon Bombers
Boston Marathon Bombers Broke Gun Laws to Acquire Weapons
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

Washington DC – -( Less than a week after the push by Democrats push for more gun control went down in flames in the Senate, Reuters is reporting the suspected Boston Marathon bombers ignored gun laws that are already on the books in possessing the firearms they used in shootouts with the police.

According to Reuters, “The two brothers suspected in the Boston Marathon bombings, who police say engaged in a gun battle early Friday after a frenzied manhunt, were not licensed to own guns in the towns where they lived.”

This means the handguns and “at least one rifle” the brothers had with them were acquired and possessed in ways that broke laws already in existence.

For example, to have acquired and possessed the firearms legally, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the elder brother, would have first needed “to apply for a gun license with the local police department where he lived in Cambridge, Massachusetts.”

In Massachusetts, a Firearms Identification Card (FID) is required before buying, transporting, or possessing a firearm.

Another example of how new gun control laws will not deter criminals who have been ignoring the old laws for years.

AWR Hawkins writes for all the BIG sites, for Pajamas Media, for, for and now AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.

His southern drawl is frequently heard discussing his take on current events on radio shows like America’s Morning News, the G. Gordon Liddy Show, the Ken Pittman Show, and the NRA’s Cam & Company, among others. He was a Visiting Fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal (summer 2010), and he holds a PhD in military history from Texas Tech University.

If you have questions or comments, email him at [email protected] You can find him on facebook at

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

No surprise that these terrorists broke laws,one after another. Laws don’t apply to them…well,laws aren’t followed by criminals. The lawabiding citizens of Watertown must’ve wished for something more than a baseball bat or a locked door.the real first responders are the people directly threatened by criminals and terrorists. Defdourselves.! Why would you leave that responsibility to someone else?


If the criminals don’t obey the laws, they’ll get different criminals. They’re on their way, with the elimination of these two. That is, unless they work out a plea deal bow that we know A) he wasn’t Mirandized and they’re prosecuting him in civilian court.

Pantera Vazquez

A criminal disobeying the law which is already on the books, how surprising.

People believing that criminals would obey new enhanced laws-how asinine.

Criminals are criminals-laws which handcuff law-abiders mean nothing to criminals….