Too Much Illegal Immigration

By Alan Caruba

Nancy Pelosi of Calif., and Rep. Ruben Hinojosa D-Texas, right, joined by members of Congress, wait for their turn to speak during a immigration a rally on the National Mall in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2013, which was specially opened for this demonstration despite being closed for WWII vets.
Nancy Pelosi of Calif., and Rep. Ruben Hinojosa D-Texas, right, joined by members of Congress, wait for their turn to speak during a immigration a rally on the National Mall in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2013, which was specially opened for this demonstration despite being closed for WWII vets.
Alan Caruba
Column by Alan Caruba

New Jersey –-( Like many members of my generation, I would not be an American if my Italian and Russian grandparents had not got on the boat and came here.

We are fond of calling America “a nation of immigrants”, but what happens when there are too many immigrants, many of whom are here illegally? And that is the problem that has defied a solution since the last big amnesty in 1986.

As Texas Governor Rick Perry said in his book ‘Fed Up’, “We have already been burned once by false promises of border security in exchange for tying security to other aspects of the immigration debate. President Reagan, in 1986, signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act, which legalized close to 3 million undocumented immigrants.”

“The law was supposed to be a comprehensive solution with provisions intended to clamp down on border security. These provisions were never enforced, and the subsequent explosion in illegal crossings has resulted in some eleven million illegal aliens living in the United States today.”

Amnesty was an issue in the 2012 elections and it will be an issue in 2014 so long the “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act”, S.744 awaits a vote. It is a very bad law for a number of reasons. First among them is the fact that there are the millions of aliens who are here illegally, but who cost natural-born and naturalized Americans billions.

At a time of high unemployment, American taxpayers shell out hundreds of billions as the result of illegal immigration in the form of:

  • # Welfare costs
  • # Food assistance programs
  • # Medicaid
  • # Primary and secondary school education for children who are here illegally
  • # Incarceration (30% of all federal inmates are illegal aliens)
  • And these same illegal aliens send billions home in remittances to their countries of origin.

I thought about this as I watched the news coverage of a gathering on the National Mall of advocates of S.744, rallying for its passage.

At the time, the Mall was closed to American citizens, including veterans, because of the government shutdown. That did not stop the “Camino Americano March for Dignity and Respect” from gaining permission to rally. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi showed up to lend support along with Democrat and Republican Congressional Representatives of Latino heritage.

The Democrats know that, if they issue a form of instant citizenship to illegal aliens, most of whom are Latino, they will have a loyal voting bloc that will give them control of Congress and the White House for decades to come. They don’t really care what impact the expansion of already over-extended entitlement and welfare programs will have on the economy.

Steven A. Camarota, Director of Research of the Center for Immigration Studies, an independent, non-partisan, non-profit research organization, recently addressed the impact of S.744 in an analysis titled “How Many New Voters Would S.744 Create?”

Here are some of his findings:

  • # Based on the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis of S.744, we project that the bill will add 4.6 million new potential voters above the number added by the current level of legal immigration by 2024. The bill would add 9.5 million potential voters by 2028 and 17.3 million by 2036.
  • # Of the new potential voters S.744 would create by 2036, slightly more than one-third would be a result of the bill’s amnesty provisions based on CBO projections, the rest are due to the bill’s large increases in future legal immigration.
  • # Even without the effects of S.744, the current level of immigration will add 5.1 million new potential voting-age citizens to the country by 2024, 8.4 million by 2028, and 14.9 million by 2036.
  • # Combined, the current level of immigration plus the additions from S.744 would create nearly 10 million potential voting-age citizens by 2024, and more than 32 million by 2036.
  • # The 32 million potential voters current immigration plus S.744 will create is slightly larger than the number of Americans over age 65 who voted in 2012. It is more than twice the number of veterans who voted in 2012, and nearly three times the number of Hispanics who voted last year.
  • # For legal permanent immigrants to be potential voters they must be at least 18 years old and have lived in the country for at least five years, allowing them to naturalize. For most amnesty beneficiaries under S.744, it will take at least a decade for them to naturalize.
  • # These projections are only for potential immigrant voters, not their U.S.-born children. The projections take into account deaths, return-migration, and residency requirements to naturalize. We do not estimate the share that will actually naturalize and vote once eligible to do so.

Camarota’s analysis adds up to 17 million potential voters within 25 years.

The United States of America is broke and both parties that have held the White House have contributed to the debt, although it is a fact that President Obama has literally doubled it since taking office in 2009. Entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, will have to be reformed if they are to continue. In their present form they are financially unsustainable.

Now add in an amnesty for millions of illegal aliens and their children, just because they decided to jump to the front of the line instead of seeking citizenship as so many others have.

Either we have borders or we don’t.

c Alan Caruba

Alan Caruba’s commentaries are posted daily at “Warning Signs” his popular blog and thereafter on dozens of other websites and blogs. If you love to read, visit his monthly report on new books at Bookviews.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What bugs me the most is our elected officials calling these illegal aliens ‘immigrants’.

If I crossed over the border into N Korea, China, Iran, Iraq, Russia, etc would they call me an ‘Immigrant’ or a SPY?

These people who cross the fence and borders should be SHOT ON SIGHT with PAINT AMMO bright PINK paint ammo so they can be captured and prosecuted.

Lock them up after conviction in a tent jail city for 10 years and that will keep them out.
Prosecute them as SPIES.


Due respect to Pelosi!? She doesn’t deserve any respect. Cheap trashing of immigration laws for their own agenda and free votes. Who didn’t see this coming? Only dummies. We need a Siberia, complete with gulag, for these criminals who crash the border. Hard time labor working on our infrastructure, with no pay and very little spoiled food. They won’t want to come in anymore.


Amen to that,Kaarnij


Can I just say with the all due respect to Madam Pelosi that you are everything that is wrong with our country. Our nation would be a better place had you not cast your evil shadow of the congressional floor. And while we are at it, shame on you for trading the love of our servicemen and veterans away for votes from those that have no business voting. You Madam EX-Speaker are an obamanation of epic proportions. Please take your friend Harry and get out.