Applying Some English Common Sense to Gun Silencers

By Dean Weingarten

Conversation with an Englishman on Silencers
Conversation with an Englishman on Silencers
Dean Weingarten
Dean Weingarten

Arizona – -(  Use of Silencers is encouraged in Europe Photo Courtesy Gun World

At the Shot Show in January of this year, I sat next to an Englishman who wrote for a UK hunting magazine.  We talked about gun laws in the UK and in the US, and the subject turned to gun mufflers, AKA silencers or suppressors.

I was interested to learn that gun mufflers were relatively easy to obtain, and were in fact encouraged by the police.

Having a suppressor for your rifle was considered to be polite, and a way to reduce noise pollution.   Virtually all air guns had suppressors.

My new British friend turned to me and said: “I never have understood the United States regulation of suppressors?  What is the purpose of making them so hard to obtain or own?

I could not answer him.  The best speculation that I have found is that there was some mention of suppressors being used for poaching, as a reason for putting gun mufflers in the same category as machine guns, but it was always only a hint.  I have never seen that purpose mentioned in the arguments for the National Firearms Act of 1934.

It is easy to see the purpose of the now completely irrational ban on short barreled rifles and shotguns.   When one of the major purposes of the original act was to make handguns illegal for most people, and registered and licensed for the remaining few, it made sense to make the conversion of rifles and shotguns into pistols illegal.

But gun mufflers?  What was the point of that?

Maybe it was just legislative strategy, a trade-off item that was available to be taken out to allow some other provision to be included.   Maybe it was simply that the Roosevelt regime was grabbing for all the power it could.  Likely, we will never know.   Clearly, it was one of the greatest public health blunders by the federal government, ever.  Millions have lost hearing because of the extreme regulatory and financial barriers placed on gun mufflers.

Europe is ahead of the United States when it has come to the reasonable use of gun mufflers.   The Finnish Supreme Court has ruled that it is a constitutional right to make, buy, sell, trade and use gun mufflers in that country.

One would think, with the second amendment in the United States Constitution, the same would apply here.

But, as my British friend observed, it doesn't; and it does not make any sense.

©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch

About Dean Weingarten;
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973.  He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • 4 thoughts on “Applying Some English Common Sense to Gun Silencers

    1. I still recall the surprise I felt walking past a sporting goods store in Stockholm and seeing they were having a SALE on suppressors. One of them was priced at around $40US-equivalent. 40 bucks!

    2. my wife’s family is from Germany. when two cousins who were shooters came to visit I took them shooting at our club range. When I handed them hearing protection they asked why i did not have a suppressor. I explained our laws in nj and hey were very surprised.

    Comments are closed.