Management of Michigan’s Wolves, Show Down Between Big Money Anti’s & We the People

Wolf Facts and What It Means To You
Michigan DNR Applauds Federal Decision to Remove Wolves from Endangered Species List
Glen Wunderlich
Glen Wunderlich

Lansing, Michigan – -(  The impending showdown over Michigan’s wolf management looms large, as we head into the current election cycle.

On one end of the spectrum is the largest anti-hunting organization in the nation – the Washington-based Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), while opposition comes from Citizens for Professional Wildlife Management (CPWM).

Over 5 ½ years ago, then Deputy Secretary of the Interior, Lynn Scarlett, announced the removal of the western Great Lakes wolf population and portions of the northern Rocky Mountain population of gray wolves from protection under the Endangered Species Act.

“Wolves have recovered in the Great Lakes and the northern Rocky Mountains because of the hard work, cooperation and flexibility shown by states, tribes, conservation groups, federal agencies and citizens of both regions,” said Scarlett. “We can all be proud of our various roles in saving this icon of the American wilderness.”

Well, almost all of us.

HSUS has already sent its lobbyists to Lansing and has threatened even more lawsuits. Science has been discarded in lieu of robo calls designed to pressure legislators to ignore the collective voice of some 297,051 registered Michigan voters’ signatures in support of the Scientific Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act.

One thing is certain, and it’s a simple formula that can be applied to any circumstance involving hunting, as far as the animal rights campaign is concerned: they are against it.

But, what have we as a nation learned from this raging battle? Apparently not a thing.

During its annual year-end population survey, the Mexican Wolf Interagency Field Team (IFT) counted a minimum of 83 Mexican wolves in the wild in Arizona and New Mexico at the end of 2013. This number demonstrates a 10 percent increase in the known population of Mexican wolves in the wild compared to the 2012 minimum population count of 75 wolves.

“With a minimum of 83 wolves in the wild, the Mexican wolf population has nearly doubled in the past four years,” said Benjamin Tuggle, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Southwest Regional Director. “I’m proud of the remarkable progress that the Mexican Wolf Recovery Program and its partners have achieved in bringing the Mexican wolf back from the brink of extinction.”

So, we spend tax dollars to raise and plant wolves and continue to set “realistic recovery goals that anti-hunting groups will never agree on, then spend more tax dollars on more lawsuits and call it progress. And, on top of all this, in states such as Oregon, wolf depredation tax credits are allowed up to $37,500 per year based on the current market value of livestock killed. Have you checked the price of beef lately?

Insanity? You bet!

Your real voice to your state representative can trump computer calls by indicating that you support the Scientific Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act. If our representatives fail to vote for science-based wildlife management this month, it’ll be us conservationists against them in November.


About Glen WunderlichCharter Member Professional Outdoor Media Association (POMA). Outdoor writer and columnist for The Argus-Press ( and blog site at  Member National Rifle Association (NRA), Michigan United Conservation Clubs (MUCC), member U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA), Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA), Commemorative Bucks of Michigan (CBM). Adjutant of Perry, Michigan Sons of Amvets Post 4064 and Chairman Perry (MI) Youth Hunt Extravaganza, a sanctioned event of Perry Sons of Amvets held the third weekend of September each year.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chandie Bartell

How does this go Kristi Lloyd, Anti-Hunting Activist from Kalamoozo, MI? You’re are getting real creative with your lies: “Hunters signed the petitions against the wolf hunt so how can HSUS be anti-hunting?

******I knew you were dumb, that that one takes the cake.


Instead of wolves we need to extend hunting seasons and allow many more kills each day. The extra meat could go to poor people so they won’t have to depend on taxpayer money and the government. Of course the government wants to keep people dependent on them hoping to get their votes. No one thinks that it is our money they are wasting.

Dave E.

Thanks for the update, Glen. What are you hearing in regard to the Scientific Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act’s effect on restoring dove hunting to Michigan?


Oh, and the legislature is trying to cut out the “we the people part”.


Perhaps you could explain the science that is being asked for in this science-based proposal? CPWM can’t. You realize this proposal asks for free licenses for active military members. That’s all well and good, but I’m sure you know that free licenses means less money for conservation, habitat restoration for wildlife, right? Hunters signed the petitions against the wolf hunt so how can HSUS be anti-hunting? That doesn’t make any sense. Why would hunters support an “anti-hunting” organization? I don’t think you completely understand that proposal.