Connecticut News Paper: Sue One Gun Company, Sue Them All

By AWR Hawkins

Connecticut State Police Assault Weapon Rifle
Connecticut News Paper: Sue One Gun Company, Sue Them All
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

Washington DC – -(Ammoland.com)-  On December 17 2014, North Central Connecticut’s Journal Inquirer (JI) reported that by suing Bushmaster firearms, Newtown parents and their attorney have effectively sued every gun company.

Written by managing editor Chris Powell, the JI column shows this is so because “the lawsuit’s theory”—that the AR-15 “has little utility for legitimate civilian purposes”—”could be applied against any gun [manufacturer].”

Powell points out that federal law actually prohibits suing gun manufacturers for the misuse of their products. But he believes this suit may test that law or may be intended to somehow bluff Bushmaster into issuing settlements. If the the law fails or settlements result—or both—the suit against Bushmaster turns into a precedent for suits against other AR-15 manufacturers and, eventually, any gun company whose products have been misused.

Powell laments the approach Newtown parents have taken. He believes these matters should be approached constitutionally—pushing for a repeal or augmentation of the Second Amendment, instead of trying to use the court system for financial gain and/or to close down an entire industry.

He also contends that the suit misses the real problems behind the misuse of guns in our country—one of which is the lack of parenting necessary to teach young men how “to become civilized.”

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins

About:
AWR Hawkins writes for all the BIG sites, for Pajamas Media, for RedCounty.com, for Townhall.com and now AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.

His southern drawl is frequently heard discussing his take on current events on radio shows like America’s Morning News, the G. Gordon Liddy Show, the Ken Pittman Show, and the NRA’s Cam & Company, among others. He was a Visiting Fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal (summer 2010), and he holds a PhD in military history from Texas Tech University.

If you have questions or comments, email him at [email protected] You can find him on facebook at www.facebook.com/awr.hawkins.

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
teebonicus
teebonicus
6 years ago

The primary argument by the plaintiffs is “the lawsuit’s theory”—that the AR-15 “has little utility for legitimate civilian purposes”—”could be applied against any gun [manufacturer]” is foreclosed not only by federal statute, but by judicial precedent: “With obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such [militia] forces the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made. It must be interpreted and applied with that end in view.” – UNITED STATES v. MILLER, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) 307 U.S. 174 Translation: The attributes the plaintiffs claim should make these arms off-limits to civilians are precisely… Read more »

Jeff Dege
Jeff Dege
6 years ago

If Bushmaster settles, they’ll be bankrupt in six months.

Remember S&W?

Janek
Janek
6 years ago

Why is Butch holding the rifle like that?