Gabby Giffords: The Gun Control Movement’s Human Shield

By AWR Hawkins

Al Sharpton
But no one displayed the conviction that Giffords’ views were above criticism quite as well as MSNBC’s Al Sharpton. On March 6 2015 he mumbled: “How can the NRA tweet anything like this about Giffords after all that she went through?”
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

Washington DC – -(Ammoland.com)-  On March 4 I reported on Gabby Giffords’ renewed push to extend background checks to gun shows so that everyone has to pass the same background check her attacker passed.

Media outlets and gun control proponents went apoplectic, exposing the fact that they had assumed Giffords would be able to push background checks as a solution to “violence” without her claims be scrutinized.

In other words, Giffords is their human shield — the gun control representative who could do and say what she wanted without facing any real pressure to prove her claims were true.

But our report showed that her claims that background checks are a way of “stopping violence” can’t even survive Giffords’ personal experience. After all, her attacker, Jared Loughner, passed a background check to acquire the gun with which he attacked her in January 2011.

After my reported on this, the NRA tweeted the story and media and gun controllers lost it. Slate, MSNBC, Daily Mail, Huffington Post UK, Tucson Weekly, Mother Jones, Blue Nation Review, Daily Kos, Chicago Sun Times, The Hill, New York Daily News, San Francisco Sentinel, Inquistr, and others were aghast that Breitbart News actually tested Giffords’ claims.

But no one displayed the conviction that Giffords’ views were above criticism quite as well as MSNBC’s Al Sharpton. On March 6 he asked: “How can the NRA tweet anything like this about Giffords after all that she went through?”

In other words, Giffords is their human shield.

Gun control proponents know background checks don’t stop high profile gun-related crimes — just as they didn’t stop Jerad and Amanda Miller (Las Vegas), Elliot Rodger (Santa Barbara), Ivan Lopez (Fort Hood 2009), Aaron Alexis (DC Navy Yard), James Holmes (Aurora theater), Nidal Hasan (Fort Hood 2009), and numerous other high profile attackers who passed background checks to acquire their guns. Yet background checks continue to be pushed because they represent another way to control law-abiding gun owners.

Giffords was supposed to stand with Democrats and push for their passage as one whose ideas could not be criticized, mush less assailed.

Here’s the problem — background checks don’t work, and Giffords’ attacker is living proof of that.

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter: @AWRHawkins.

About:
AWR Hawkins writes for all the BIG sites, for Pajamas Media, for RedCounty.com, for Townhall.com and now AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.

His southern drawl is frequently heard discussing his take on current events on radio shows like America's Morning News, the G. Gordon Liddy Show, the Ken Pittman Show, and the NRA's Cam & Company, among others. He was a Visiting Fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal (summer 2010), and he holds a PhD in military history from Texas Tech University.

If you have questions or comments, email him at [email protected] You can find him on facebook at www.facebook.com/awr.hawkins.

4
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
EricJanekTEX Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Eric
Guest
Eric

Yet the race baiter Rev Al tries to extort companies to pay his IRS tax bill that he is a dead beat taxpayer. Rev practice what you preach and pay your tax bill so Uncle Sam can give the money away to the 1 % .

Janek
Guest
Janek

Mea Culpa. Rev. Al said “Resist we much”. I say ‘We must resist’!

TEX
Guest
TEX

Thats one really fu*ked up bone !

Janek
Guest
Janek

Like Rev. Al says, “Increase, we much”. Whatever that means? LOL