What Gun Control Advocates Don’t Understand About Mass Shootings

By Tom McHale

What Gun Control Advocates Don't Understand About Mass Shootings
What Gun Control Advocates Don’t Understand About Mass Shootings
Tom McHale headshot low-res square
Tom McHale

USA –-(Ammoland.com)- I had a really weird conversation with an old friend from High School shortly after the Naval Yard facility shooting. It’s been festering in the back of my brain ever since. It went something like this.

Me: These gun free zones are dangerous. They’re encouraging exactly the sort of behavior that they claim to prevent.

Old Friend: I’m just thankful that other people didn’t have guns in there. Can you just imagine the carnage that could have resulted from a crossfire?

Me: What?

Old Friend: I haven’t been involved in this sort of thing, but people I know who have been in firefights have told me there’s nothing worse than being caught in a crossfire. It could have been a lot worse. Just imagine.

Me: No, there’s no way it could have been worse. There’s nothing worse than sitting there helplessly, while some psychopath walks around at his leisure and decides when and how to kill you. There is nothing worse than someone like that having absolute control over your life and you being powerless to help yourself. Do you really believe anything could be worse than helplessly sitting there waiting to be shot and killed?

To me, this difference in opinion, based on a completely imaginary scenario of some “crossfire“, was beyond stunning. Imaginary scenarios are a dangerous thing. Left to our own devices, we can imagine all sorts of incredible scenarios with no limit to imaginary disastrous consequences.

In my world view, given an absolute choice between sitting and waiting to be killed versus having the ability to fight back, even if I only had a one percent chance of success, I would like to think I would choose that one-percent chance every time.

Maybe that’s because I’ve thought about such things, I don’t know…

While I still can’t say I understand the origins of my friend’s point of view, I have to guess that it stems from a lack of thought about the “what ifs” in life that actually seem to happen on occasion. If you’ve never allowed your brain to consider a “what if” scenario, like, for example, what it might be like to be involved in a mass shooting, I can see how you might arrive at the “crossfire would be way worse” point of view. Maybe your brain is so set on the idea that others will protect you, that at some unconscious level, you are counting on help to arrive before your appointment with the wandering psychopath.

Without looking at actual events, or thinking about such scenarios, I can see how it might be easy to assume that mass shooting events are like the police and military gun battles we see on prime time TV shows.

You know, groups of highly trained people, who never miss, run around with infinite-capacity guns, causing devastation wherever they look. The best trained and most tactical group wins as the show breaks to commercial.

In reality, things are quite different. Virtually without exception, those who commit these heinous mass murders are cowards who seek absolute control of a situation. They seek targets where they can exercise complete control, without interruption, for their 10 minutes of infamous activity. Their temporary reign of terror always quickly ends when they are confronted with force.

The Incalculable Value of Interruption

While my friend’s conversational points focused on the danger of a crossfire, in a sense, that’s exactly what we want to happen when someone is intent on committing mass murder. Think about it. In every terrible example of a mass killing event, the perpetrator had not only desire, but time and absolute control over the immediate environment. They owned a period of time, maybe only 10 minutes, where they could do whatever evil thing they wanted to do, completely unopposed. While 10 minutes sounds short on paper, it’s an eternity for the victims involved. Try sitting still and doing nothing but watching the seconds go by on your watch for 10 straight minutes. Oh, and imagine someone is in your house trying to kill you while you watch the seconds tick.

But what happens when some person or event interrupts the murderers plan? Good things, as it turns out.

A perfect example is the “non-mass shooting” at Clackamas Mall in Oregon. Never heard of it? That’s exactly my point, because, due to simple interruption of a psychopaths plan, it never became a mass shooting.

Just three days prior to the tragic mass murder at Sandy Hook, a psychopath named JTR (I won’t promote his name here) stole a rifle, loaded up with ammo and entered the Portland area mall intent on shooting random people. He went in with somewhere north of 150 rounds of ammo and began shooting strangers. After hitting three, he was confronted by a legally armed concealed carrier, Nick Meli. Thankfully, Mr. Meli ignored the “No Guns Allowed” signs at Clackamas and he was able to confront the gunman. Seeing his plan interrupted, the gunman ran to a stairwell and promptly killed himself.

Interrupted is the key word here. With no opposition, the gunman had his pick of between 8 and 10 THOUSAND shoppers in the mall at the time of the shooting. Tragically, he managed to kill two and wound a third before being confronted by Mr. Meli. Not in any way, shape or form to diminish Mr. Meli’s courage or skill, but he did not need to engage in a running ninja fight with the gunman. In fact, Mr. Meli never fired his gun, due, by his description, to an innocent bystander behind the gunman.

Mr. Meli interrupted the gunman’s plan, and that was enough to save dozens of innocent lives. This is the point that gun control advocates fail to grasp. Even temporary interruption of a killer’s plan can be enough to completely change the outcome. Once again, there is no scenario worse than allowing them to continue with their evil plan according to their planned timeline.

The value of interruption is not fancy combat science. It’s a basic concept taught in sports, self-defense, law enforcement and the military. If you want to get scientific about it, look up USAF Colonel John Boyd’s work on the OODA loop. It all boils down to acting, so the opponent is moved to a position of reacting to your act, rather than carrying out their original plan. Many times, that’s all it takes to make a dramatic difference in the outcome.

Consider some of the most heinous mass murder events and the amount of uninterrupted time the killers had to perform their acts:

  • Washington Navy Yard: 1 hour and 9 minutes (Police arrived on the scene within 5 to 10 minutes, almost certainly slowing down the shooter plan of action)
  • Sandy Hook: About 5 minutes
  • Virginia Tech, Norris Hall: Between 10 and 12 minutes

What might the outcome have looked like in each of those situations if the murdered had faced a simple interruption within the first minute?


Tom McHale is the author of the Insanely Practical Guides book series that guides new and experienced shooters alike in a fun, approachable, and practical way. His books are available in print and eBook format on Amazon. You can also find him on Google+, Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I have been to Clackamass Mall many times and looked for a guns prohibited sign as I went in, never saw one. Maybe they put it up after I moved.


The critical part that the author misses is that he and his friend agree: there is nothing worse than waiting for someone to murder you as you remain helpless to their will. His friend’s fear of “crossfire” is the same fear, only compounded. He assumes that if there were more armed people in the area that there would be more people trying to kill him. If one man with a gun is bad then more men with guns is worse. The constant reinforcement of the victim mentality as made him a victim-in-waiting, waiting for one of those evil men to… Read more »

Rob Morse

It doesn’t matter if the first responder wears a white t-shirt or a blue polyester uniform. Heaven knows we want more good guys with a gun to protect us because they save so many lives. https://slowfacts.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/saved-by-a-good-person-with-a-gun/


April 4, 1991 The Good Guys! hostage situation.

4 gunmen armed and masked took over the store, tied up the 40 hostages.

SWAT got them out after firefight, gunman shot several hostages dead.


Another excellent example, though less known these days, is the 1965 University of Texas “Tower Sniper” shooting. A former Marine went up on the parapet surrounding the top of the campus clock tower and began shooting folks walking by on the quadrangle below with an M1 carbine (before leaving the house he had also murdered his mother with a knife). He shot a bunch of people, but the most interesting points to me are that; 1) once the kids on campus started grabbing deer rifles from their pick-up trucks (seems like every one had one in a “headache rack”) and… Read more »


Now I know ‘the rest of the story’, ,,thanks.

D. Murphy

Excellent comments Dr. Dave!


This individual has difficulty with basic reasoning and appears to live in some fantasy world. It is hard to believe that someone could be that stupid and still walk and breath at the same time. What does being caught in a cross fire have to do with being at the mercy of a lunatic bent on killing every one that comes across his path. The logic is totally lost on me.

Dr Dave

We surely don’t need to berate the guy for his opinion. Obviously he has never had single handed experience in a gun fight and I bet you haven’t either Most people call them “gun battles” in 25+ plus years in Federal State and Local LEO activity I have been in plenty of “incidents where weapons were used” (notice I didn’t say gun battles) MOST end up with the illegal shooter be it psycho or drug dealer or gang banger (the absolute worst) or robber or the like either firing a few shots and giving up or ultimately committing LEO suicide.… Read more »


Dr. you give good info. In Nevada June 12,2014 when two officers were shot dead by a husband and wife while they were in soda line during their lunch. They shot them in the head. Police believe the couple acted alone and targeted officers at random. The two cop killers then ran into the Walmart and an armed citizen noticed them. The bystander who was shot was identified as shopper Joseph Wilcox, 31. He was going to confront the suspects. “He was carrying a concealed weapon, and he immediately and heroically moved toward the position of Jerad Miller. Upon completing… Read more »

Retired Tier 1

What a bunch of rambling crap.


Sounds like your friend suffers from “Jack Bauer” syndrome where Jack always saves the day, never runs out of ammo, never misses and my favorite (being ex-LEO), never has to write a report or do any paperwork of any kind what so ever! 🙂