Is a UK Crackup Ahead?

Is a UK Crackup Ahead?
Is a UK Crackup Ahead?
Pat Buchanan
Pat Buchanan

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- David Cameron is the most successful Tory Party leader since Margaret Thatcher.

Yet history may also record that his success led to the crackup of his country, and Great Britain's secession from the European Union.

How did Cameron's Tories capture their majority?

First, they compiled a strong record to run on.

More critically, they attacked the Labour Party of Ed Miliband as too far left to govern, and warned that a Labour government would be hostage to a secessionist Scottish National Party (SNP), without whose votes Miliband could never reach a majority in Parliament.

Labour could not shake off the charge, because it was true.

The attack on the SNP as a subversive party secretly allied with Labour had an ancillary benefit for the Tories. It helped produce a SNP sweep of all but three of Scotland's 59 seats. The Labour Party was virtually wiped out in Scotland, its northern bastion.

How Labour recovers from this amputation is hard to see. What does this portend for the United Kingdom?

To keep Scotland within the UK, Cameron has promised a “devolution” of tax and spending powers to the Scottish Parliament.

But this will not be enough. For the Scots are going to be forced to sit in Westminster for five years and watch a Tory prime minister, acting on Tory principles, gut the social welfare state in which they believe. And, with Labour, the SNP will be helpless to stop it.

This situation seems certain to stir Scottish demands for a new referendum on independence, which would have a far better chance of succeeding than the last one — it lost 45-55.

What does the Scottish National Party want?

Retention of the social welfare state, British nuclear missile subs out of Scottish bases and Scotland out of the U.K. But Scottish nationalism is certain to generate a countervailing English nationalism.

Scotland's demand for a divorce may soon find an echo in England.

Which brings us to the party that won 13 percent of the vote, three times the SNP total, but only a single seat in Parliament.

This is the United Kingdom Independence Party, whose populist leader Nicholas Farage resigned when he failed to win a seat of his own.

Nevertheless, the UKIP and the anti-EU Tories, some of whom sit in Cameron's cabinet, have been promised a national referendum on secession from the EU by 2017.

Consider how the interests of these parties will push them all toward an England that is free of the EU and of Scotland both.

Unhappy with Tory policies, yet unable to alter them, the Scots are likely to create conflicts in Parliament that strengthen the forces of secession.

Former SNP leader Alex Salmond, who won a seat in the Parliament, is promising it.

As for the Tories, with Scotland outside of the U.K., they would see a brighter future. For Scotland is lost to them, and in a U.K. of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, a Tory future is assured.

As for the UKIP, its goal of secession from the EU would be easier to achieve if the pro-EU Scots are out of the U.K. and unable to vote in the referendum on Britain's future.

As for Labour, the SNP is now not only its dominant rival north of Hadrian's Wall, it is a secessionist albatross draped around their neck in England. What good is Scotland to Labour now?

Yet the United Kingdom may be only the first of the nations of Old Europe to break up or break out of the EU.

Should Scotland leave the U.K., this would surely set off a reflex reaction in Catalonia in Spain, Veneto in Italy and Flanders in Belgium.

Moreover, the forces driving the European Union toward a breakup today seem far stronger than the forces for deepening the political and economic ties of Europe.

In postwar Europe, transnationalism and globalism, the opening and erasure of borders, the transfer of power from nation-states to transnational institutions and elites, all seemed inevitable.

No more. Jean Monnet is passe. Now is the time of Marine Le Pen and Nicola Sturgeon of the SNP. Patriotism, populism, nationalism are the growth stocks of 2015.

Northern nations like Germany and Holland are weary of carrying what they see as the lazier and more profligate EU members of Club Med. In Greece and Spain, populist parties are fed up with the endless austerity demands of the Germans.

Most of the countries of Europe have a secessionist party or an anti-immigration, anti-EU Party. Like Great Britain, some have both.

Across Europe, peoples are eager to recapture control of their borders from the EU and halt immigration, especially from across the Mediterranean, where war, terrorism, poverty and overpopulation are propelling north millions of Arabs, Africans and Muslims who are failing to assimilate into European societies.

These Europeans seek to re-establish their independence, to build nations that reflect their true identity, something we Americans went to war for in 1775, when we, too, threw the cousins out.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.

  • 4 thoughts on “Is a UK Crackup Ahead?

    1. Diamond, having reread the piece again I will stand by my first comment that primarily PB is being dismissive of Scotland’s right to independence as a distinct nation state ( due to the fact that the Scottish are a distinct ethnic group/race ) referring to Scotland as being pro-EU as a negative and that England therefore would be better off out of the EU and minus Scotland, OH POOR OLD ENGLAND HOW THEY SUFFER. Although not in favor of the European super state project myself, I do understand why Scotland and Ireland in particular are quite pro-Europe in that membership of the EEC/EU has acted as a bulwark for both countries against British/English hegemony and aggression. It has been a misconception among the mainstream American right-wing that they have more in common with the English conservative establishment than they do with Republicans in Ireland, France, Italy etc. As for your comparison of Obama and the monarchical system, I couldn’t agree more and this has also the potential to become in effect a hereditary one, with Hilary Clinton or Jeb Bush most likely to become the next U.S. president representing a financial elite which is based between New York and London. America must look back towards its foundation principles and ideals to find a way forward and to position America as a role model for the rest of the world, to me that would mean rediscovering its Republican ideology, opposing hereditary privilege and elitism in all its forms and recognizing that collective freedom surpasses that of the individual.

    2. I don’t read that at all Pat. I see the author saying if Scotland wants to be a nanny state let them do it alone
      and not be a burden to England. We are just now becoming aware of what a monarchy feels like. In the way
      Obama rules and an elite few dragging down the rest with the ideas of a failed model of government. Socialism.
      I think you need to reread the article and put it into the perspective of what is happening here and what conservatives stand for. The similarities, to me, are disturbing. But hell what do I know?

    3. The tone of this article I find very confusing, as an American Republican are you not in favor of freedom and independence for all nations, and in this case Scotland, Wales and Ireland. You seem to be derogatory in your descriptions of Scotland and their independence aspirations, this displays again the constant and to me un-American subservient and conflicted attitude of the American right-wing to England and England’s continued antiquated and oppressive imperialism, which America displaced with the American Revolution and had to defend with the much forgotten and overlooked war of 1812. I would remind the author that the American war of Independence was a struggle against the British system of government which is still in place, where a hereditary elite aristocracy retains through a semi or quasi democracy the real power and wealth of their subjects ( not citizens btw ). It should be a constitutionally enshrined tenet of U.S. policy to support and promote the independence and freedom of all nations and people and to oppose the outdated monarchical system as is seen in England, Spain etc. Also are you not Scottish by decent.

    Leave a Comment 4 Comments