Killer Cops or Malicious Prosecutor?

Pat Buchanan
Pat Buchanan

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- Who killed Freddie Gray?

According to Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby, Freddie was murdered in a conspiracy of six cops who imprisoned him in a police van and there assaulted and killed him.

The killer was African-American officer Caesar Goodson, driver of the van, who, with a “depraved heart,” murdered Freddie.

This is a summation of the charges against six Baltimore cops made Friday by Mosby, as she ranted into the TV cameras:

“To the people of Baltimore, and the demonstrators across America: I heard your call for ‘No justice, no peace.' … To the youth of this city: I will seek justice on your behalf. …

“This is your moment. … You're at the forefront of this cause and as young people, our time is now.”

Mosby has cast herself as the avenging angel of those clamoring for retribution. But unless she has far more evidence than has been revealed, Mosby is talking a stronger hand than her cards are showing on the table.

For consider the captivity of Freddie Gray, step by step.

Making contact with a cop at 8:39 in the morning, Freddie fled, was caught with a knife, and put in a police van that made four stops.

On the first, the cops lifted Freddie off the floor and sat him down. On the second and third, they looked in on him again. On the fourth, they had detoured to pick up another prisoner.

Mosby is charging that not only did the cops willfully ignore Freddie's cries for help, but also the driver deliberately handled the van in so reckless a manner as to inflict a fatal injury, the severing of his spine.

But where is the evidence for any of this?

True, as Freddie had a legal knife, he had committed no crime and should not have been arrested. And the cops should have used the seat belt in the van to buckle in Freddie.

But those are police failings, not police felonies.

And while Freddie should have been taken sooner to a hospital, did the cops know how badly injured he was? How could they have known — if they had done nothing to injure him?

And when and how was Freddie's spinal cord severed?

There appears thus far no evidence that five of the cops did anything to cause this. And no evidence has been brought forward that Goodson tried to injure Freddie by giving him “a rough ride.

The Washington Post reported that the second prisoner said that on the final leg of the trip to the police station, Freddie was thrashing around, possibly injuring himself.

Consider. In the Rodney King case, where there was film of his extended beating with billy clubs, a Simi Valley jury refused to convict any of the four cops. In Ferguson, Michael Brown sustained half a dozen gunshot wounds. Yet officer Darren Wilson was not indicted.

On Staten Island, 350-pound Eric Garner was seen on film being taken down by five cops in an arrest that led to his death, but none of the cops was indicted.

And there is far less visible evidence of any police crime in the case of Freddie Gray than in any of those three incidents.

The heart of the case against all six is that they denied Freddie the medical treatment needed to save his life. But where is the proof the officers knew how gravely injured he was, that he was in danger of death?

By going on national television and ordering the arrest of the six officers on charges that could mean the rest of their lives in prison, Mosby may have stopped the riots and calmed the crowds in Baltimore.

But she has kicked this can right up the road into 2016.

For what is coming is predictable.

Thus far, Freddie Gray has been portrayed by the media as the victim of brutal vigilante cops. But, soon, those six officers are going to be seen as flesh-and-blood cops who may have blundered in not seeing the extent of Freddie's injuries, but who are being railroaded by a malicious prosecutor pandering to an angry mob calling for vengeance.

While we have seen film of the arrest of Freddie Gray and his placement in that van, film that is inconclusive, what we are going to hear now is the other side of the story, the cops' side. From now on, they will be the underdogs, and Americans love underdogs.

A nation already riveted by the Freddie Gray episode, already divided, will become more so, as we move toward the indictments, the trials and the verdicts.

In our deepening political divide, the left invokes the narrative that black males are all too often terribly treated by brutal cops, while the right sees tough policing as having cut crime to more tolerable levels and cops as the thin blue line between them and anarchy.

The battle lines have been drawn upon which the “War On Cops” issue will be fought out in 2016.

As Pete Seeger sang, “Which side are you on?”

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.

  • 4 thoughts on “Killer Cops or Malicious Prosecutor?

    1. By all means, let’s rush to judgement on this. While you’re at it let’s take a convicted murderer line Joanne Chesimard and prop her up on a pedestal. Or better yet you can move to Cuba too.

    2. How many unarmed men, who by accident of birth just happen to be Black must be killed by Police before we consider that there just might be a problem with the Police? And don’t lecture me about so called “Black-on-Black” crime. In these instances sanctioned agents of the municipal, county, or state organs of government in demonstrably false cases of claimed danger or unsupported infractions of the law have unlawfully killed otherwise innocent citizens. How do we the claims of inherent danger have been false? In every case the victims have been shown by evidence to have been unarmed. In every case the alleged infraction that was the proximate cause of the interaction to begin with has been a nonviolent act. Police officers are not kings and certainly not akin to Samurai of feudal Japan that have the right of blood sanction over peasants for every act or perceived act of disobedience or disrespect.

    3. Most of the time I could agree with this, however, there have been 389 previous complaints about the Balt. police giving “rough rides” to arrested people. In America we are innocent until proven guilty, even if he did have a switchblade,he didn’t deserve a “rough ride”. This one appears to have gone too far.

      1. Pepe, you are correct about the policy of “innocent until proven guilty”, except you seem to deny that same right to the officers being charged in this case. Unless you were on the scene on the street and riding in the police van for the entire ride you have no more information than the rest of us. The evidence in this case will come out at trial and a judge and jury will determine to the best of their abilities whether or not that evidence supports the charges filed. Not the media, not the opposing attorneys, but the judge and jury. I’ll withhold my judgement until then and let the system work.

    Leave a Comment 4 Comments