Subverting the Second Amendment: The Subtle Road to Injustice

By Roger J. Katz

Burning Guns and Subverting The Second Amendment
Subverting the Second Amendment: The Subtle Road to Injustice

Arbalest Quarrel

New York, N.Y. -(Ammoland.com)- Antigun proponents and zealots are quick to qualify their remarks about guns so as not to openly disparage American citizens who cherish their Bill of Rights – all ten of them.

“Yes,” the antigun proponents and zealots chant over and over again: “we need ‘commonsense’ gun laws, and of course we respect the Second Amendment.”

The obligatory parenthetical remark, “of course we respect the Second Amendment,” hangs at the end of the phrase, “commonsense gun laws,” like a puppy dog’s tail. The gun grabbers “wag it” in our faces as if to suggest that American citizens who wish to exercise their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms should be “sensible about guns” – as if we aren’t and, so, must be made to be.

Antigun proponents and zealots always have the Second Amendment in the cross-hairs, ready to wound it, eventually to kill it, even as they proclaim no such intention to do so.

The fact of the matter is that the antigun movement seeks to end civilian ownership of firearms. The movement’s entire reason for being is focused on that end. Second Amendment adherents know or should know that more “commonsense gun laws” mean, ultimately, nothing more than “total gun confiscation,” except for those individuals who happen to fall into some “small, select, special, trusted, elite class.”

Subverting The Second Amendment

Lest there be any mistake about the intention of the antigun groups in this Country and those abroad, an article in a fairly recent Sunday Review Section of The New York Times, makes plain the agenda of these groups. Mike McIntire, a reporter for The New York Times, asks, What Makes a Shooter Do It?” (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/opinion/sunday/what-makes-a-shooter-do-it.html).

That question – the title of McIntire’s op-ed – is rhetorical. McIntire answers his own question, when, toward the end of his article, he says: “What makes someone seek solace in a spasm of bloodshed is perhaps unknowable.” Because no one knows for certain – because no one can ever really know for certain – who might resort to violence, McIntire is making a not so subtle suggestion that the better approach is to get rid of the guns now, from as many Americans as possible – namely, and particularly, from law-abiding Americans – so that any temptation to commit violence with guns in the future – the mere possibility that a law-abiding American might, even if improbably, commit violence with guns in the future – is substantially lessened, if not altogether removed.

What McIntire and those like him are opting for, then, is a “Minority Report” type of society in America.

In the film, “Minority Report,” starring Tom Cruise, a police force called “PreCrime” arrests citizens before they commit their crimes of murder. The people, so apprehended by PreCrime police, are duly and brutally punished, and in a novel and most bizarre fashion, even though they never actually committed crimes of murder.

Michael Bloomberg, Everytown for Gun Safety
Antigun proponents and zealots always have the subverting the second amendment in the cross-hairs, ready to wound it, eventually to kill it, even as they proclaim no such intention to do so…

Yet, as bad as a “Minority Report” society is, what McIntire and other antigun zealots envision for Americans is just as bad if not worse than a “Minority Report.” Consider: A call for an eventual, total civilian gun ban, which, for gun proponents and zealots is on the horizon, is based on the notion that a person does not ever have to commit an actual crime with a gun to be, in a sense, guilty of having committed a crime with a gun. Antigun proponents and zealots seek to remove the logical possibility of a crime ever being committed with a gun. They seek to accomplish that feat by banning, outright, the mechanism for that violence from the vast majority of honest, sane, rational, law-abiding American citizens – millions of average American citizens – who have never acted out a violent crime with a gun and who never would do so.

If they succeed, the Bill of Rights, itself, becomes meaningless. It begins to crumble. One Amendment after another is formally repealed. The first Amendment to go is actually the Second, followed by the First.

Make no mistake. The dream of the antigun zealots in this Country and their many counterparts elsewhere in this Country and in the world at large would be a nightmare for Americans. If there is anything the law-abiding American citizen ought, rationally, to fear more than hardened criminals getting their hands on guns and harming someone or, if there is anything the law-abiding American citizen ought to fear more than a few paranoid lunatics getting their hands on guns and harming anyone, it is the presence of a powerful, paranoid Government operating without Constitutional restraint, clamping down on an individual’s every thought, action, and deed, imposing its will on everyone.

For those readers who are interested in reading the complete, unabridged article, “Subverting the Second Amendment: The Subtle Road to Injustice,” we invite you to visit our site, using this link: http://arbalestquarrel.com/subverting-the-second-amendment-the-subtle-road-to-injustice.

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel' website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

www.arbalestquarrel.com

8
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
6 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
JeanteebonicusMikeGaryMeat Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
teebonicus
Guest
teebonicus

McIntyre’s “solution” is Prior Restraint, which is settled law. YOU CAN’T DO IT.

A fundamental right of the people, preexisting and merely guaranteed by the 2A, cannot be broadly denied based upon the presumption that some people MAY misuse that right to commit crimes.

That is a basic tenet of individual liberty.

People like McIntyre must be cut off at the knees with this principle before they utter two words on the subject.

Jean
Guest
Jean

“McIntyre’s “solution” is Prior Restraint, which is settled law. YOU CAN’T DO IT” I wish that were true, Teebonicus. But as we’ve seen with DUI checkpoints, and now in some places SEATBELT checkpoints, and with car insurance and medical insurance – and those are only the ones I’m aware of – there is a SERIOUS issue with the sheeple allowing prior restraint. Smoking comes to mind, Glo-Bullshit warming, wind farms, the anti-Nuclear power groups, etc, etc, etc. There are ways to force us into compliance. I won’t be popular for this (might even need to remove the comment) – but,… Read more »

Gary
Guest
Gary

AS always the skewed interpretation of the 2nd Amendment by the antigun zealots follow a very narrow path of tunnel vision forgoing the trees and scenery and strictly focusing on the double yellow line. Never understanding the actual purpose and reason but condemning the instrument that actually could protect them from the very right to have Freedoms in this Country…which were fought over 200 years ago.

Meat
Guest
Meat

The 2nd amendment is a closed case and not up for any debate. Any infringement on this right is unconstitutional and shall be punishable by law. It’s time to hold those accountable for breaking the law

Mike
Guest
Mike

Amen!

Herb
Guest
Herb

I don’t know how anyone could argue against the banning of guns. Look at how successful prohibition was. How about the war on drugs! And the war on hunger. If something needs doing, just pass another law either banning or promulgating. What’s not to understand? Naturally that includes the police, the secret service, body guards for state governors known as chauffeurs and state police. I’m sure that the President, Vice President, state governors, big city mayors and former mayors like bloomberg and candidates for public office like b Clinton are ready to lead by example. I’d like to suggest: NEVER… Read more »

hippybiker
Guest
hippybiker

It is estimated that 260 million people were liquidated by their own governments in the 20th century, after first being disarmed. The two biggest offenders were the Soviet Union and Red China. Source Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Please watch “Innocence Betrayed.”

“Those who would not remember history, are doomed to repeat it.”
George Santayana

Joe
Guest
Joe

It is amazing that these peaceful folks always have these really great ideas to make the world so much better. Lets get rid of fossil fuels, before we even perfect the alternative. Then horse and buggy your way to the emergency room, oh I know just the government support people can use these fossil fuels.
Kind of like we are going to take the guns away from law abiding citizens before we learn how to get them away from the criminals, thereby turning us into a Nation of sheep. But we will be protected by our armed government.
Sieg Hiel everyone!