‘School Shooting’ May Have Been Self Defense

By Dean Weingarten

NAU School Shooting Steven Jones
‘School Shooting’ May have been Self Defense
Dean Weingarten
Dean Weingarten

Arizona – -(Ammoland.com)- The incident widely reported as a rampage ‘school shooting’ in Arizona at the Flagstaff campus on October 9th may have been legitimate self defense.

If you look closely at the photograph, it is clear that Steven Jones suffered some blows to the head.  His lower lip is swollen, and you can see abrasions on it and one to the his right below the lip.  There is also a abrasion just to his left and above his left eyebrow.  It appears that Jones had legal possession of the Glock pistol.  It would have been legal for him to have carried it in his car in Arizona.

From azcentral.com:

Jones, 18, claimed he and two friends were first attacked and beaten outside an apartment complex in the Oct. 9 incident and then chased to his car by another group of students who shouted obscenities and threatened to kill them

But the surviving victims and other witnesses told varying stories that corroborated some of Jones’ statements and contradicted others.

Jones, who wept during police interviews, claimed he got his Glock pistol from the car and told the pursuers, who were then surrounding his friends, that he had a gun. He said he shot two of the attackers, again saying they would kill him, when they charged him.

Blows to the head can easily be lethal, as can attacks by multiple assailants.  If Jones version of events is correct, or if he can show a jury that it was reasonable for him to believe that his version was correct, he could easily be justified in his use of deadly force to defend himself and others.

Jones cooperated fully with police; he even sought their protection when they came to the shooting scene.  He does not fit the profile of a rampage shooter.  He is not a loner, nor did he attempt to shoot people randomly.  There is testimony that his version of events is correct.  Without his glasses, he may have been visually impaired.

The testimony that disagrees with his, is largely form the people that he shot, who he claims were attacking him.   It is not clear how much police investigation has been done.

From the article:

In Piring’s version of events, he was not standing with Brough but saw him fall and then was shot as he walked toward him. Piring said he didn’t see any fighting. Piring said he saw Brough fall as he was running toward him and did not realize at first he had been shot as well.

With all the surveillance video available today, with numerous cell phones, I hope the police have been diligent in searching for evidence.  Even placement of the cases ejected at the scene would be important;   Jones said that he fired again, in an upward direction, as several men knocked him down and attempted to disarm him. It should be easy to determine if Jones were attacked before he fired, about how far he was from the people that he shot at, and how many people were involved in the initial attack, how many were involved in the chase that followed, and how many attempted to disarm him.  Blood should have been drawn from Jones and the others involved to determine blood alcohol levels or the presence of other drugs.

Jones has plead not guilty.  At a court appearance on 24 November, 2015, his lawyer made clear that he was attacked and then chased.  From abc15.com:

Jones told police that he shot them after he was hit in the face. He said the shooting was in self-defense.

“I don’t think there is any doubt at this point that he was attacked outside that parking lot and then chased into that parking lot,” said Jones’ attorney, Burges McCowan.

Jones was a pledge with the Sigma Chi fraternity.  All of the men shot were from Delta Chi Fraternity.

c2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included. Link to Gun Watch

About Dean Weingarten;

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 years ago

They’ve already determined that the victim was leaning towards him or possibly approaching him. I’ve read he fired in the air and warned them as well. Also read the 2nd “victim” was craying his friend when shot- I’m betting that’s not true— another report is going to help his friend- that could easily mean going after the shooter who then shot him. Another obviously biased report said the girlfriend who was cradling the shot boyfriend “escaped being shot”– um noooooo- she wasn’t threatening IR a tracking the shooter so he didn’t aim at her- obviously.

Brenda Dennison
Brenda Dennison
5 years ago

Thank you Dean! This is exactly what I have been saying the whole time. Jones was completely sober, beaten, out numbered and scared by the older group of men that surrounded he and his friends. And Im sick of see the picture of a 14 year old Colin Brough. Colin was a full grown man!
Its very sad that Jones was forced to protect himself from a group of drunk, high violent men. It’s changed his life as well as the deceased and injured. They were all victims.

Jim Jaudon
Jim Jaudon
5 years ago

Agree with your article 100%.
I just hope Arizona Dept. of Public Safety is not involved in the investigation. all one has to do is look at how they screwed the pooch in the Freeway Shooter case. Or maybe screwed UP the pooch.