Senator Murphy Reveals “Slippery Slope” Strategy on ABC’s “This Week”

By Dean Weingarten

Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy
Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy

 

Dean Weingarten
Dean Weingarten

Arizona – -(Ammoland.com)-
On ABC This Week, June 19, Senator Chris Murphy revealed what Second Amendment supporters have said was the anti-Second Amendment strategy all along.  Pass incremental infringements on the Second Amendment until nothing is left that means anything.  That is why anti-Second Amendment plotters push so hard on legislation that seems unrelated to the current terrorist atrocity.

They use it as an emotional vehicle for other legislation they normally could not pass.  In the interview, ABC's Jon Karl is questioning Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut. From the ABC transcript:

KARL: — there's these proposals. Your proposal would've done nothing in the case of Orlando. It would've done nothing to stop the killing in San Bernardino and in fact was — is unrelated to the killing in Newtown.
So why — I mean, why — I mean, why are we focusing on things that have nothing to do with the massacres that we are responding to? 
This is a perfectly logical question.  Why is Murphy focusing on this? His answer is instructive.
MURPHY: Well, so first of all, we can't get into that trap. I disagree. I think if this proposal had been into effect, it may have stopped this shooting. 
But we can't get into the trap in which we are forced to defend our proposals simply because it didn't stop the last tragedy. We should be making our gun laws less full of Swiss cheese holes so that future killings don't happen. That trap is an impossible one.

No, it is not an impossible one.  If the Senator were dealing honestly, he could explain it.  If it would have helped somewhere else, he could make the argument elsewhere.

The argument of the anti-Second Amendment lobby is that if the government controlled all access to guns, and strictly limited them, then terrorists could not get them, or at least it would be harder.  But that kind of control has failed, massively, all over the world, just as it did in France, in Norway, in Belgium, in Brazil, in Mexico, in Jamaica, in South Africa, in Puerto Rico, in the UK.

The plan guts Second Amendment rights, allowing for incremental confiscation over time, just as has happened in England and Wales.

Murphy continues, explaining that the Sandy Hook massacre is being used to push for unrelated infringements on the Second Amendment.

The Sandy Hook families lobby for background checks.
You know why?
Because they're just as concerned with the young men and women who are dying in our cities because of the flow of illegal guns as they are about a ban on assault weapons or high magazine clips that might have prevented the Newtown killing.
So this has to be broader than just responding to the tragedy that happened three days ago.

The facts do not support that contention.

The terrorist Watch list legislation is particularly dangerous. It sets the precedence that a person's Second Amendment rights can be stripped from them without due process by bureaucratic fiat.  There is no appeal process.  You do not know your rights have been lost until you attempt to exercise them.  It is an anti-Second Amendment schemer's dream because anyone they dislike can be put on the list, secretly.  The list can be expanded overnight to include whole groups of people.  It is a Constitutional nightmare.

The components that the anti-Second Amendment plotters are attempting to put in place are all pieces of a machine that ends up destroying Second Amendment rights.

Ban people on the Watch List from owning guns. That establishes the power to strip people's Second Amendment rights from them without due process or even notification.

Universal Background Checks – Make it illegal for anyone to obtain a firearm without asking government permission, which is subject to the Watch list.

Universal Gun Registration – No gun to be legally owned unless the government knows who has it, who is allowed access to it, and where it is stored.

Mandatory notification of lost or stolen guns – Makes it legally difficult to resist incremental gun confiscation. Incremental gun confiscation has been common where universal registration has been implemented.  It has already taken place in California and New York.

If you are not able to turn the registered gun in, you will have committed a crime and be subject to prosecution.  As more atrocities happen, more guns are declared illegal,  and/or it becomes more expensive to keep them, until there are none left.  It might take decades, but it happened in England and Wales.

All of Senator Murphy's pieces of legislation fit into an overall scheme to destroy Second Amendment rights over time.  He cannot argue for them all together. The intent would be too clear. The package could never pass the Congress.

Incrementally, bit by bit, using the latest crime to push for unrelated legislation, they could be put in place.  That has been the plan for 50 years.  Precursor legislation, such as the 1968 gun control act, and the national instant background check system are already there.  They do nothing to actually reduce crime, but they enable future incremental steps to destroy Second Amendment rights.

50 years ago, anti-Second Amendment potters were open about their strategy.  Now they know they have to use lies and subterfuge.

©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Link to Gun Watch

About Dean Weingarten;

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • 10 thoughts on “Senator Murphy Reveals “Slippery Slope” Strategy on ABC’s “This Week”

    1. This guy sounds like a traitor…. what should be done I ask….
      Citizens arrest and stuff like that…. and other stuff

      WHATEVER IT TAKES AS WERE IN THE RIGHT AND THEY ARE IN THE WRONG
      WHAT TO DO WHAT TO DO….

      1. Who are you gonna fight? Think about it. I’m not sure about you but here in New Jersey the enemy looks like me, talks like me, and sends their kids to the same schools as you or I would. Fight for the Republic sure sounds grand but think about it. Who are you gonna fight. We have had the Dumocrats in power here for generations it’s ingrained in the culture. The enemy does not wear a uniform or go to meetings.
        The easiest thing to do is just leave the state and go to free America. But that poses another problem because patriots have been fleeing this state for years because it’s easier. Millions of patriots have left which only makes the state more left leaning. Think about it who would you fight?

      2. If white people would take to the streets, and riot as the other groups do, we would get our political power back. Politicians only fear physical revolt.

    2. The moment guns are stripped from citizens, our country will be invaded. The reason we haven’t been invaded this far is because every citizen of the US is technically a soldier. This keeps other countries in fear of invading us.

    3. If these ‘statists’ continue interfering in the lives and personal freedom of law abiding citizens sooner or later they’ll see the 2nd Amendment in action. That’s not a threat, that’s the normal result when freedom is curtailed. This will happen whether the 2nd Amendment still exists or not. Statist politicians fear the general population like Dr. Frankenstein feared the peasants storming his castle with pitchforks. That’s why they’re going after your guns, if only incrementally.

    4. I posted this elsewhere, but I think it fits here too – so here it is again –

      The history of gun control in America and how it won the West…sort of:

      Back in the old days of the “wild west,” following our nation’s Civil War, many settlers were moving into lands claimed by Native American Indian tribes and this created some tension. There was a “conflict of cultures and religions” between the Indians the newly arriving settlers, that resulted in misunderstandings and even some open hostility. A few deluded bands of radical Indian activists even resorted to open violence, and began attacking settlers, sometimes massacring them in what some Republicans of the time erroneously referred to as “terrorist attacks.” History records that the US government recognized the problem and moved quickly to address it, by banning possession of the most modern lever-action rifles with their high capacity magazines and rapid fire capability, because they had the ability to fire many shots quickly, potentially allowing a user to kill many people before reloading. These military assault type firearms were designed for use by the US Army and were so dangerous and deadly in Union hands that a Confederate soldier once referred to them as, “That damn Yankee rifle that you load on Sunday and shoot all week.” The government also banned the possession or sale of “repeating pistols” with “high capacity cylinders” that were capable of firing multiple shots (as many as 6 – which is why these guns were called “six-shooters”) to anyone but military or law enforcement members, since they were originally designed for sale to the military and obviously had no reasonable use unless one wanted to kill many people without having to reload. After passage of the laws banning them, the marauding Indian bands were still able to get them from their usual illegal sources, however, the settlers, who were generally law-abiding Americans, were not. This led to a disparity in armament between the two groups and forced the settlers to develop a new approach to resolving the conflict. As it happened, it was about this time that many of the recently freed slaves were also moving west, and they brought with them a new form of popular “gospel” music including a song called “Kumbaya,” which became very popular in the areas of conflict on the frontier. Further, some of the younger folks among the settlers had recently discovered that by smoking the dried leaves of a plant called “hemp,” which was normally used for making rope, it was possible to become quite “mellow” and less hostile. From this point on, after an Indian massacre was over, the survivors of the massacre would sit around the campfires with their attackers and smoke hemp while singing “Kumbaya” together. This led to a cessation of hostilities and the adoption of the settler’s values by the formerly hostile Indian bands….Oh, no, wait…I’m sorry, I got it mixed up – that’s not exactly how it happened THEN… that’s just how the Democrats think it will work NOW. Where’s John Wayne when we need him?!

    5. OLDSHOOTER;
      You had me worried there for a minute UNTIL I finished reading your long posting !!

      A GREAT WORK OF SARCASAM !!

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *