California ‘Tyrant Registry’ First Amendment Lawsuit Adds Massachusetts Man

Firearms Policy Coalition-supported federal civil rights lawsuit seeks to strike down a California law that prohibits political speech.

We Will Fight Back Against Tyranny
California ‘Tyrant Registry' First Amendment Lawsuit Adds Massachusetts Man
Firearms Policy Coalition
Firearms Policy Coalition

SACRAMENTO —-(Ammoland.com)- Today, attorneys representing two people who were served with an information takedown demand by the State of California’s Legislative Counsel filed an amended complaint in the federal First Amendment speech lawsuit Publius v. Diane Boyer-Vine.

Publius” (a pseudonym, since the challenged law carries a criminal penalty) runs a political blog under the alias “The Real Write Wringer” and writes extensively about California politics, civil liberties, and the Second Amendment.

They, through their Web host, were served a censorious takedown letter from the California Legislative Counsel threatening litigation if their “tyrant registry,” which was posted after Governor Jerry Brown signed six new gun control bills into law on July 1 2016, wasn’t removed due to the “grave risk” that it supposedly posed to the safety of elected officials. Publius is a member of the civil rights advocacy organization Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), which lobbied against dozens of gun control bills this year.

On July 5, Publius published a blog post saying, in part, “… below is the names, home addresses, and home phone numbers of all the legislators who decided to make you a criminal if you don’t abide by their dictates. So below is the current tyrant registry. These are the people who voted to send you to prison if you exercise your rights and liberties. This will be a constantly updated list depending on future votes ….”

Newly-added plaintiff Derek Hoskins is the owner of northeastshooters.com, an online forum for discussing firearms issues and shooting sports activities, news, and politics. Hoskins is also a board member of the Massachusetts-based civil rights group Commonwealth Second Amendment (Comm2A). Like Publius, the Legislative Counsel issued a takedown demand to Hoskins based on a discussion thread concerning the controversy over the Legislative Counsel’s takedown demand to Publius. The Legislative Counsel required Hoskins “to continue to ensure that” the censored information is not reposted anywhere on his forum for four years.

The case seeks to strike down California Government Code section 6254.21(c), which broadly restricts the Internet publication of the home address or telephone number of any “elected or appointed official.”

The plaintiffs plan to seek an injunction against enforcement of the law in November.

Said FPC President Brandon Combs, “The speech at issue in this case is not unlike the contentious and often personally-pointed political speech of the Founding era. Legislators can’t simply pass laws that criminalize law-abiding people and destroy fundamental rights and then expect to be shielded from public discourse and protest.”

“The State of California’s actions to suppress political speech it doesn’t like cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny,” stated Comm2A co-founder and director Brent Carlton. “We’re proud to stand up for fundamental freedoms in this case and wherever our members’ civil rights are infringed, even if that speech is unpopular.”

The plaintiffs are represented by Bradley Benbrook and Stephen Duvernay of Benbrook Law Group as well as Eugene Volokh, a UCLA law professor who has written and taught extensively about the First and Second Amendments.

Before joining the UCLA faculty 20 years ago, Volokh clerked for Judge Alex Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the U.S. Supreme Court. He also operates the popular legal blog “The Volokh Conspiracy,” now hosted at the Washington Post.

A copy of the amended complaint and other case documents can be viewed or downloaded at https://www.firearmspolicy.org/legal/publius-v-diane-boyer-vine.


Editors Note: The CA Tyrant Registry is still available online:

  • CA Tyrant Registry : http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_11/603408_.html
  • CA Tyrant Registry : http://andyrutledge.com/tyrants-at-home.html
  • Please send us more links, in the comments, to other copies of the CA Tyrant Registry, published online, as you find them.

Firearms Policy Coalition (www.firearmspolicy.org)is a grassroots, nonprofit public benefit organization. FPC’s mission is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially the fundamental, individual Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Commonwealth Second Amendment (www.comm2a.org) is a grassroots civil rights organization dedicated to promoting a better understanding of rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Comm2A’s efforts include educational programs designed to promote a better understanding of Massachusetts and Federal firearms laws and rights as well as programs to defend and protect the civil rights of Massachusetts gun owners.

  • 4 thoughts on “California ‘Tyrant Registry’ First Amendment Lawsuit Adds Massachusetts Man

    1. It is the Left, dangerous and deluded as they are, that will bring on the revolt that is going to come in this country. And they will pay for it dearly. They are destroying the Constitution one ammendment at a time, thinking we won’t notice. When there is no more money to maintain their Free Shit army,they will turn on them ( the left ) in a heartbeat. They are digging their own grave. I believe I will live long enough to see it.

    2. This proves the liberal agenda of disarming citizens so they cannot defend themselves against tyranny then start taking away their constitutionally given rights of free speech and whatever else is needed to totally control the populace. That is exactly what the 2nd amendment was about when our forefathers had the wisdom to defend the citizens of this country through constitutional law. Liberal judges and politicians are attacking our rights with all of their might right now.

    3. Unless the people operating the web sites are urging violence or illegal actions against these cowards, printing their addresses is free speech. That is how the New York Times got Mr. Joshua assassinated and nothing happened to them because of it.

    Comments are closed.