What Trump’s Wall Says to the World

By Pat Buchanan

American Flag America Divided
American Flag America Divided
Pat Buchanan
Patrick J .Buchanan

USA –  -(Ammoland.com)-  “Something there is that doesn't love a wall,” wrote poet Robert Frost in the opening line of “Mending Walls.

And on the American left there is something like revulsion at the idea of the “beautiful wall” President Trump intends to build along the 1,900-mile border between the U.S. and Mexico.

The opposition's arguments are usually rooted in economics or practicality. The wall is unnecessary. It will not stop people from coming illegally. It costs too much.

Yet something deeper is afoot here. The idea of a permanent barrier between our countries goes to the heart of the divide between our two Americas on the most fundamental of questions.

Who are we? What is a nation? What does America stand for?

Those desperate to see the wall built, illegal immigration halted, and those here illegally deported, see the country they grew up in as dying, disappearing, with something strange and foreign taking its place.

It is not only that illegal migrants take jobs from Americans, that they commit crimes, or that so many require subsidized food, welfare, housing, education and health care. It is that they are changing our country. They are changing who we are.

Two decades ago, the Old Right and the neocons engaged in a ferocious debate over what America was and is.

Were we from the beginning a new, unique, separate and identifiable people like the British, French and Germans?

Or was America a new kind of nation, an ideological nation, an invented nation, united by an acceptance of the ideas and ideals of Jefferson, Madison, Lincoln and Dr. King?

The Old Right contended that America existed even before the Revolution, and that this new nation, this new people, wrote its own birth certificate, the Constitution. Before Washington, Madison and Hamilton ever went to Philadelphia, America existed.

What forced the premature birth of the nation — was the Revolution.

We did not become a new nation because we embraced Jefferson's notion about all men being “created equal.” We became a new people from our familial break with the Mother Country, described in the declaration as a severing of ties with our “brethren” across the sea who no longer deserved our loyalty or love.

The United States came into being in 1789. The Constitution created the government, the state. But the country already existed.

When the Irish came in the mid-19th century to escape the famine and the Germans to escape Bismarck's Prussia, and the Italians, Jews, Poles, Greeks, Slovaks came to Ellis Island, they were foreigners who became citizens, and then, after a time, Americans.

Not until decades after the Great Migration of 1890-1920, with the common trials of the Depression, World War II and Cold War, were we truly forged again into one united nation and people.

By 1960, almost all of us shared the same heroes and holidays, spoke the same language and cherished the same culture.

What those with memories of that America see happening today is the disintegration of our nation of yesterday. The savagery of our politics, exemplified in the last election, testifies to how Americans are coming to detest one another as much as the Valley Forge generation came to detest the British from whom they broke free.

In 1960, we were a Western Christian country. Ninety percent of our people traced their roots to Europe. Ninety percent bore some connection to the Christian faith. To the tens of millions for whom Trump appeals, what the wall represents is our last chance to preserve that nation and people.

To many on the cosmopolitan left, ethnic or national identity is not only not worth fighting for, it is not even worth preserving. It is a form of atavistic tribalism or racism.

The Trump wall then touches on the great struggle of our age.

Given that 80 percent of all people of color vote Democratic, neither the Trump movement nor the Republican Party can survive the Third Worldization of the United States now written in the cards.

Moreover, with the disintegration of the nation we are seeing, and with talk of the breakup of states like Texas and secession of states like California, how do we survive as one nation and people?

Old Europe never knew mass immigration until the 20th century.

Now, across Europe, center-left and center-right parties are facing massive defections because they are perceived as incapable of coping with the existential threat of the age — the overrunning of the continent from Africa and the Middle East.

President Trump's wall is a statement to the world: This is our country. We decide who comes here. And we will defend our borders.

The crisis of our time is not that some Americans are saying this, but that so many are too paralyzed to say it, or do not care, or embrace what is happening to their country.


Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.

  • 22 thoughts on “What Trump’s Wall Says to the World

    1. Here’s a thought!! The #$/$- do this ALLLLLLL THE TIME, A GO FUND ME ACCOUNT!!
      Send in what U can afford, $1.00- or as much as you can.
      That wall would be paid for in 6 mos time, if not sooner.
      To start things off I’ve got a crisp brand new $100.00 bill just waiting to b sent somewhere?????
      Not to mention the idea of taxing ALLLLLLL OF THE $$ GOING OUT OF THE U.S.

    2. I have lived in AZ since the late 50’s. I have worked LE in Southern AZ. AZ’s spends two billion dollar of its annual nine billion dollar budget on illegals.
      The wall is not the whole answer. With the extra manpower and equipment, General Kelly can setup a defense of a physical barrier, aerial surveillance, sensor arrays, mobile quick response arrest teams, and immediate deportation or incarceration of ILLEGAL ALIENS. This will greatly reduce the flow of ILLEGAL ALIENS across our southern border. If they try to cross the border en masse, well we shoot trespassers.

    3. @Joe, Well of course, Joe, we want to close the border not because “they” are Mexican, but rather because “they” are not of our tribe. Even an ant hill does that. The taxpayers of our American tribe just do not have enough money to make the lives of every person on this planet perfect, by taking them all in. I like your post and look forward to reading more of them in the future.

    4. I like the idea of closed borders but am uncomfortable with basing the reason on who it is that tries to come here. I am much more comfortable with defending closed borders because those who come here illegally are breaking our laws whatever their color, or point of origin. It is the rule of law, designed and maintained in a democratic fashion that I want defended. I don’t care from what country a person comes here as long as he does not break our law to do so. And then the second argument. This American tribe may be better or worse than some other tribe, but it is our tribe. What we have, we are under no obligation to share with another tribe. We are under no obligation, moral or otherwise, to accept a visitor, or immigrant, if it is not in our tribes best interest. The only country we owe anything to is France, and that only because of their help during our revolution, which incidentally, was done out of their own self interest. We have long ago repaid that debt with interest. And yet another point is that our constitutional liberties are, just that, ours. The constitution, and the laws both federal and state, that grow from that soil place obligations and grant privileges on citizens of our tribe. Non-citizens do not have those obligations or privileges by right, but by loan, a loan that may be called anytime they break our laws. A country whose own citizens are expelled from the US needs to be prepared to accept their tribal members back or deal with them in whatever way they wish. But we have the absolute right to expel any person who is not a citizen. Thank you for reading this.

    5. The wall won’t solve our illegal immigration problem, since half of the illegal aliens in the U.S. entered legally, at ports of entry, with visas, and overstayed them.
      The wall will only keep out poor Mexicans. The organized criminals and drug cartelistas are some of the richest people in the world, and rich people will always find a way in.
      Mexico is a powder keg. Its economy consists of four (maybe five) components: Cattle, tourism, drugs, and the remittances sent home by illegal aliens in the U.S. (The fifth component may be oil. More on that in a minute.*)
      If the safety valve of the U.S. is taken away (if you notice, three of the four components in its economy are dependent on the U.S.), Mexico will have a violent revolution within ten years. (I’m betting on five, but I’ll say ten.) The civil war will spill over into the U.S., not only on the border, but in the big cities of the U.S., where warfare between the various factions will make the Crips/Bloods and People/Folks gang wars look like wedding receptions gone bad.
      I really don’t know what the solution is, but a wall ain’t it.

      *Oil would be a big chunk of the economy, except every president of Mexico since 1970 has retired a billionaire, and most of it came from embezzling Pemex.

        1. When the crap in the toilet splashes up on you, you’ll understand better.
          Mexico is in the throes of a low-grade civil war right now, between the forces of the drug cartels and the government. Part of the government wants to eradicate them, and another part of the government wants a piece of their action. All of that will come HERE if Mexico falls completely apart.

          1. Plus, then we’ll have a wave of refugees from Mexico, which we’ve never had before. And how can you tell the difference between a legitimate refugee and a cartelista looking for new territory?

    6. There is an easy solution to funding the wall:

      Add a 7% or 10% federal tax surcharge to every Western Union wired payment two sites outside the United States; that is to say if a person within the United States sends money to a person outside of the United States, regardless of the amount, then either 7% or 10% tax on the total amount sent is levied when they send it.

      Last time I checked, something like 3.5 to 4 billion dollars a year is wired outside the USA.

      Do the math people, we could find that border wall really really easily, and the people who are here illegally with be the ones funding it!

      What do you guys think?

      1. I completely agree that money transfers are the way to go because they are all one direction. There are probably zero dollars sent from Mexico into the U.S. and this would help avoid any tit for tat. I am, however, concerned about when the last time you checked was. Dr. Robert Rector, from the Heritage Foundation, has a very good report on the actual expenses incurred by Americans to pay for illegal immigration. Using the government numbers of 11 to 12 million(probably low balled), he came up with 114 billion dollars annually. The estimate for remittances to Mexico alone was in the 30 billion dollar range. A ten percent tax on Mexico to receive this money would garner some 3 billion per year. Four to five years and the wall is completely funded. Leave the tax in place to help pay for the man power to guard it. Mexican President cries and wails but we can not hear him through our big beautiful wall.

      2. On the nose! The largest money stream into ‘Ole Mejico’ is Western Union money transfers from the USA to Mejico. Fifteen-twenty percent surtax should pay for the wall in no time.

    7. I’m for the wall, but I also know that we can record history, but not learn from it. Walls are only good if you have someone patrolling them 24/7. I saw we go to a flat rate income tax and then use the idled IRS workers to man the wall.

    8. Warning: If you are a liberal/progressive/socialist do not read the following message:The Mexicans have been sh*tting on us for years because they mistake our Christian mercy for weakness. I am glad that the President of Mexico has chosen to insult President Trump. Trump is at his best when someone insults him.

      1. @ wild bill, Mexico’s approach to the changes coming are really stupid on their part. We are their number 1 trading partner and we have kept them up and running for many years. Just more stupidity from a stupid culture. Incidently, I totally agree with your post.

        1. @tomcat, I agree, and I can not see why the Mexican president has read Donald Trump so poorly. I look forward to much entertainment on Fox over the southern border issue.

    9. Dan, you are so very right, But how do we unite when so many just want to protest, cry in the
      streets, do destruction at tax payers cost. The vary ones doing this are the ones that call Trump supports ‘Bigots” They are the ones that do not want to see others point of view. Before we can unite many of us need to grow up. The problem with that is that this actions are being passed down. Even our most prestigious universities promote this type of action. Before long “snowflake” and buttercup will be words we are not allowed to use. But at the same time we can hear 10 year old on TV say “screw the President” after they start a fire in a public trashcan. There are 3 people that can help in a big way. Hillary Clinton, Bernie Saunders and Barry Obama. They claim to love this country, but have not made any effort to calm their supports. What great leaders they are. NOT!

    10. Well stated! Now if just more people a lot more could read this maybe just maybe it might open their ears, eyes of some of them. To undersatnd a Nation with out boarders is no longer a Nation! Therefore no national pride ! Divided we will fail! We must be united in order to survive?

    Leave a Comment 22 Comments