Federal Court Hearing in Clinton Email Case Set for April 4th

Hillary's October Surprise
Hillary’s October Surprise Weiner
Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch

Washington DC-(Ammoland.com)- Judicial Watch today announced a hearing will be held Tuesday, April 4, 2017, regarding Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails that were sent or received during her tenure from February 2009 to January 31, 2013, as well as all emails by other State Department employees to Clinton regarding her non-‘state.gov’ email address (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00687)). The case is before Judge James E. Boasberg.

Items of discussion at the hearing will be the emails of Clinton aide Huma Abedin that were found on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, Abedin’s estranged husband. Judicial Watch also will be seeking answers as to the timing of the release of Clinton’s emails that were recovered by the FBI in its investigation of the server used by Clinton and others.

The State Department has previously been ordered to produce documents to Judicial Watch, and is currently processing 500 pages per month from disk one of seven available disks. At the upcoming hearing, the State Department must address the number of documents subject to FOIA on the remaining disks.

The hearing details are:

Date: April 4, 2017
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Location: Courtroom 19
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave NW
Washington, DC 20001

About Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and morality in our nation’s public life and seeks to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation, investigations, and public outreach.

For more information, visit: www.JudicialWatch.org.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

So Ammoland deleted my comments about this PERSON ON THE PICTURE. I don’t think I like ammoland censoring me. I am beginning to wonder if ammoland is a conservative site or are they trying to gain all the information they can on they people that post here.

Maybe I’ll check with other sites and see if anyone else has any comments on ammoland.

Wild Bill

, Some times, due to volume of comments, it takes awhile. Sometimes my comments need to be reviewed for moderation, but I have never had Ammoland censor me. There were times I wish that they had. Patience often precludes apology.

BillyBob Texas

GO GET ‘EM, Judicial Watch !!!



I would give him a pass ONLY if he turned the DOJ’s eyes onto Hillary and Obama. It’s not like he will ever hold office again and everyone knows what he did.


Why isn’t Weiner in jail? Didn’t he exchange nude pics with a 15 year old?


I agree, why isn’t this sleeze bag in jail, oh I forgot for a moment he is a democrap and they never go to jail. Maybe they passed a law that says no democrap has to go to jail, no matter what they do. Better yet, a firing squad would be more appropriate for the weazel.


We need to bring back a wall and a firing squad!!!


Would probably do us more good to bring back the board and bucket of water. I’d like to know how Weenie Wagger got ahold of, or was sent those Emails in the first place. Did Huma, forgetting that he was still on line, save them clandestinely for a personal defense, or perhaps the Wagger was a buddy of Hilly’s ? Maybe Huma was still interested in the Wagger. Does anyone know if she still has all the “girl things” she was born with, or has the sweet muslim FGM visited her too ? And i Huma’s gone from the Clinton… Read more »