School Safety and the Placebo of Gun Control

School Shootings
School Safety and the Placebo of Gun Control

U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- “We have to do something.” We’ve heard that phrase time and again from politicians and gun control spokesmen.

With some 23 thousand firearms regulations already on the U.S. law books, it seems that we’ve done quite a lot that hasn’t worked. Those ineffective laws don’t stop the urge for more feel-good regulation after the murders in Parkland, Florida. What would really save our students?

We tried mandatory background checks. Those laws didn’t stop the mass murder at Umpqua Community College in Oregon. Background checks didn’t stop the murders at Isla Vista, California, or at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California. I chose these particular examples because Oregon and California have some of the most restrictive firearms transfer laws in the country..including mandatory background checks. They already failed, but I expect the gun-prohibitionists to call for more background checks.

We tried gun-free zones, but they failed too. Rather than stop mass murderers, gun-free zones seem to attract these killers. In fact, almost all of our mass murders took place in gun-free zones. The reason is easy to understand. Mass murderers don’t want to get into a gun fight. Instead, they want to shoot innocent victims who can’t shoot back. Gun-free zones effectively disarmed the honest people who were never a threat in the first place. Unfortunately, also we disarmed the honest people who could slow down or stop the murderer. Expect to hear more calls for gun-free zones.

We tried an “assault weapons ban” back in 1994 under President Clinton. The ban didn’t disarm criminals. It didn’t stop mass murders. Dedicated mass murderers got their guns before they committed their crimes, or they got them by murder. The assault weapons ban didn’t stop them in either case. The ban only made it harder for honest gun owners to own some guns, and that is the lesson we haven’t learned.

Before you pass a new law, assume that the people who commit mass murder will break it. Passing another law will only change the behavior of the honest people who obey the law.

If more laws could stop mass murder, then our 23 thousand current gun regulations should have done it long ago.

The sad fact is that we’re passing laws to make us feel better rather than to effectively stop attacks on our schools. We know what we should do, but doing it doesn’t give us that warm feeling inside. The pleasure of a quick fix, putting more ink on paper and passing another law does.

We should know better. It is amazing to me that we finally have a generation who figured out that drug prohibition laws don’t work. That same generation is now eager to pass more gun prohibitions. Some things never change.

I want us to change what we’re doing and to protect our children. We need better mental health treatment. We also need armed staff in schools. That is what law enforcement says. That is what we do for the children of elite society, and I think they are right.

Our kids deserve it too.


About Rob MorseSlow Facts

The original article is here.  Rob Morse writes about gun rights at Ammoland, at Clash Daily, and on his SlowFacts blog. He hosts the Self Defense Gun Stories Podcast and co-hosts the Polite Society Podcast. Rob is an NRA pistol instructor and combat handgun competitor.

29
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
18 Comment threads
11 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
22 Comment authors
MbiiimdFredoldvetWild BillDenis Robinson Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Mbiiimd
Guest
Mbiiimd

Can’t argue with you there my brother. I would just have to consider you one of the few, Noelle the majority.

Mbiiimd
Guest
Mbiiimd

Don’t agree that being able to serve in armed forces should automatically mean being able to purchase firearms

Mbiiimd
Guest
Mbiiimd

Yes, eighteen-year-olds do serve in the armed forces. As I mentioned in my post, I am a veteran. However, upon entering the service, these youngsters are not just handed a rifle and told “have at it.” They are trained and supervised to an unbelievable degree. They are told when to shoot, what to shoot, how much to shoot, and what to shoot at, and then unless in a conflict zone, hand their firearms in so they can be secured and every round accounted for. So, while I am still very much pro-gun, I don’t believe that argument holds water.

Wild Bill
Guest
Wild Bill

@Mbi, You don’t believe which argument holds water?

oldvet
Guest
oldvet

Comment …I was 9 days past my 19th birthday when I enlisted , have owned my own guns since I was 10 . True they were given to me by my dad. He was one who would not have done so had I not been responsible. And yes as someone said Ted Kennedy’s car has killed more people than my civilian firearms.

Mbiiimd
Guest
Mbiiimd

As a veteran, a physician, a multiple-gun owner, and a parent who has buried a teenaged child, I can tell you that there is no easy fix, or way to escape the emotions of either side of this situation. We all want our children to be safe, and we all want our liberties to be preserved, but safety often comes at the expense of liberty to some degree. It is not a good idea for an eighteen year old to be able to purchase a firearm, and I believe that right will disappear soon. However, if the deranged soul of… Read more »

Billl
Guest
Billl

I couldn’t agree more with you. Eighteen year old’s should not be able to purchase weapons period. They are simply too immature at that age to make rational judgments. But their were a lot of failures that lead to the latest incident. Now it turns out the officer on duty in the school left the building and took up a position outside and never engaged the shooter. My guess is he was about to retire and was saving his own skin. I’m guessing here of course, but he probably took the job cause he thought it would be an easy… Read more »

USN Retired
Guest
USN Retired

Bill 18 year olds carry guns into battle you going to raise the age of entry in the military and law enforcement to.

jrw
Guest
jrw

I agree with the intent of your comment, but police departments don’t accept recruits for armed positions until they reach 21 due to federal gun laws. That being said if we are going to start changing the age for military better add voting, signing contracts, owning property and a lot of other things.

Denis Robinson
Guest
Denis Robinson

This is the only part of your article I feel needs a response. Voting, owning property, and a lot of other things were added in the early 70s when 18 year olds were given adult status. When 18 year olds were required to face a draftand go o war when they weren’t allowed to vote and therefore had no representation in our government. Or didn’t you hear about that

Wild Bill
Guest
Wild Bill

@DR, Quite right! Congress and the president legislated the age at which the full panorama of Constitutional Civil Rights attached at twenty-one years. Once the array of Constitutional Civil Rights (e.g. buying a firearm or voting) attaches, those Civil Rights can not be taken away (except for commission of a felony or adjudicated mental incompetency). Were it otherwise, Congress could take away all of our Constitutional Civil Rights by making the age of majority seventy-five or eighty-five or even ninety-five years old.

Fred
Guest
Fred

So you must believe that in two years, Nikolas Cruz would no longer be deranged. Got it, thanks for the brilliant insight.

booger red
Guest
booger red

IF THE FBI HAD GOT OFF THEIR ASS AND DID THEIR JOB THESE PEOPLE WOULD BE ALIVE I WONDER IF ANY OF THESE AGENTS HAD KIDS IN THAT SCHOOL IF THEY WOULD HAVE GOT OFF THEIR ASS NEGLECT OFF DUTY CAUSED THIS TO HAPPEN

Garrick
Guest
Garrick

Eliminating gun-free zones by arming people is a start. Less publicity for these events would be another positive thing to do. Unfortunately, publicizing these incidents, besides the intent of informing people, just gives people ideas. Publication of these incidents is why we have copycat killings and fake threats of mass murder like those two in NH this week.

George
Guest
George

Ok, ‘splain me dis one, Lucy. During WW-II, there was talk among Japan’s military planners about invading the U.S. Mainland. That discussion was rather quickly dashed when one astute leader said words to the effect, “Invading the American Mainland would be extremely foolhardy and costly. For, Americans are so well armed, that there would be a loaded gun waiting for our invasion, behind every blade of grass.” So, the world knows of our sense of freedom being linked to our ability to keep and bear firearms. Many are envious, indeed. So, why are the millions of gun owners silent? Why… Read more »

mid c jones
Guest
mid c jones

#1 REMOVE ALL GUN FREE ZONE SIGNS. #2 iNSTALL ARMED PERSONEL SIGNS #1 REMOVE ALL GUN FREE ZONE SIGNS #2 REPLACE WITH WE ARE ARMED SIGNS #3 CERTIFY STAFF WITH TRAINING AND CERTIFIED CONCEALED CARRY WITH THE STATE LAWS. OR HIRE GUARDS. OFF DUTY LEO’S OR MILITARY WITH HONORBLE DISCHARE AND PTSD CLEAR. #4 DIRECTLINE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. #5 iNCREASE AGE LIMIT TO PURCHASE FIREARMS. 21YRS OF AGE. #6 INCREASE WAITING PERIOD TO P/U FIREARM 7 DAYS.THIS TIME TO BE USED FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS( WITH EXCEPTION OF CCW PERMIT HOLDERS) #7 DATA BASE FOR ALL PROBLEM SCHOOL STUDENTS+ FELONY CHARGES… Read more »

Tim Toroian
Guest
Tim Toroian

Somebody might pay attention to them if they got off this gun free zone crap and trained and armed some school personnel. Things would have ended much sooner in Florida if that coach had been armed. We need a suit because school personnel WERE NOT armed. Let’s see the dinks and courts deal with that.

mid c jones
Guest
mid c jones

i READ ON FB EARLIER THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD VOTED NOT TO LET LAW ENFORCEMENT ARREST THERE STUDENTS IF THEY HAD PROBLEMS, AND THIS SHOOTER WAS ONE OF THE KIDS. SCHOOL TOLD LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT THEY WOULD DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS. THIS WAS LAST YEAR BEFORE HE WAS EXSPELLED FROM SCHOOL.

Marion Quinton
Guest
Marion Quinton

The only way to stop all this Democrats crap of having our kids killed so they can take our guns. is….make the only gun free zones as oldvet mention All State and Federal Govt. Buildings. Put armed guards in the schools like we have in Phoenix. Limit entries with medal detectors and change all schools back to the way they were and no more gun free BS .. That within its self is just asking for people to be killed. And why the Democrats and Rino’s pasted this kind of crap to start with. Think of it this way… if… Read more »

Michael
Guest
Michael

The DEEP STATE CABAL is targeting the mentally ill with HIGH TECH MIND CONTROL WEAPONOLOGY to force them to carry out mass shootings. They are using it to create a huge public outcry so they can disarm America. WE NEED TO GO AFTER THEM!!! http://askclaudia.com/voice-god-weaponized-mind-control-frequency-technology-2/

lee squiciarino
Guest
lee squiciarino

I agree with you guns don’t kill people people kill people and not always with a gun.

MAS
Guest
MAS

All of the infringements upon our UNALIENABLE right to keep and bear arms are unconstitutional and illegal; let alone ineffective.

circle8
Guest
circle8

We all know how well the anti drug laws have stopped the use of drugs. We all know how anti theft laws have stopped auto theft, burglary, robbery and on and on. Face it the real problem is people and some people are real A-holes. Look at the inner cities and congress for proof.

Alex T.
Guest
Alex T.

Yeah, commiefornicate the whole country.

Dave Brown
Guest
Dave Brown

Gun Free Zones should end starting at Every Government Building in The Good Old USA. Then give me the same rights to shoot if I am in fear as we give our LE. I mean both things and yes I Always Carry. As for what works and what dosen’t, a young lady as a student in that school said, What We are doing ain’t working. So Come Up With A Plan Sam, or just be quite. A Plan, An Idea, not just well that didn’t work. I have lived with firearms since I was 13 or 52 years. I have… Read more »

oldvet
Guest
oldvet

Gun Free Zones should only be at all State and Federal Government Buildings.

james
Guest
james

Driver ran a red light yesterday, hit two cars and kept driving.
There should be a law against that. Oh, there is.

Wild Bill
Guest
Wild Bill

@james, it was the accelerator pedal’s fault. It was the car’s fault. It was the red light’s fault. It was the road’s fault. I think that a person should be 43 before they are allowed to buy a car. A high school kid told me that people don’t need cars. I think that we are getting to the bottom of this!

Jim
Guest
Jim

Back in 1927 a crazy bastard unhappy he lost a school board election blew up a school in Bath Michigan killing 44 people with 38 of them being kids. We cannot control crazy bastards any more than we can control the crazy bastards in the media who use every single angle they can to attack the Constitution and push us into socialism (Bernie and the Democrat Party) and ultimately communism–where the “free” media too will quickly “disappear.”