Gun Studies: Antis Descend Into Anger Because They Can’t Win On Facts

by Alan J Chwick & Joanne D Eisen

Heil David Hogg
Gun Studies: Antis Descend Into Anger Because They Can't Win On Facts

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- There is a generational amnesia that we must overcome. For example, if one was born too late to remember the multiple affairs of John F. Kennedy (JFK), one must study history to know about them, and that they took place in the White House, during his presidency.

So, if one discusses today's national politics and hears an accusation that President Trump is an abomination because he had an active sex life before he took office and one does not know about JFK, or for that matter, Bill Clinton, one would lose the argument because of ignorance. Not because of merit.

Today, the ignorant anti-gun mob appear to be even more insane than ever, and it is up to the Second Amendment grassroots folks, like us, to educate the ignorant – both friends and foes.

We note obstructionists threatening the lives of conservative politicians. Their hostility can quickly dissolve into violence, and that possibility is something we must be prepared for, though we wish to avoid it.

We note the constant filthy mouth of David Hogg attempting to extort Publix Markets. The likelihood is that Mr. Hogg will be alive long after President Trump is dead. We must train the less informed among us to become our most knowledgeable. One learns while one teaches. Don't be afraid to read something ten times, or to ask for help.

Let's look to the past for some help, and let us concentrate now on those biased researchers who try to find negative data about civilian gun possession. These researchers and writers could find no benefits to gun possession, but neither could they find violence reducing laws. And we know they would have if they could have! It's just that the Black Market always keeps getting in the way of the promised peaceful society.

The following articles are here for example:

  • In 2000, Jens Ludwig and Philip Cook examined the results of the 1994 Brady Act background check. Their objective was to find a reduction in homicide and suicide rates. They could not.

They concluded, “implementation of the Brady Act appears to have been associated with reductions in the firearm suicide rate for persons aged 55 years or older but not with reductions in homicide rates or overall suicide rates.”

  • In 2003, the Centers For Disease Control, philosophical firearms banners, published a report onlineevaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing violence.” They evaluated rifle bans, waiting periods, shall Issue” carry laws, and other restrictive gun laws.

And they were forced to conclude, “The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any firearms laws or combination of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.” The Table at the end specifies “insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness.”

We should remember that these folks would lie if they could get away with it. We should accept their findings! Restrictive gun laws do not work as promised by our power-crazed politicians and by ignorants like David Hogg.

  • In 2005, the National Research Council published a book Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review (The book is available online). Their committee did not “credibly demonstrate a causal relationship between the ownership of firearms and the causes or prevention of criminal violence or suicide.”

They examined laws designed to reduce access to criminals and unqualified persons and found that pro and con arguments were based on speculation, not evidence. They write, “It is simply not known whether it is possible too shut down illegal pipelines of guns to criminals nor the costs of doing so.” That's cleaned up scientific jargon that means the black market trumps all the laws they can think of, short of repealing the Second Amendment.

They could not find evidence that the 1994 federal assault weapons ban was effective. While they found that some restrictive laws reduced gun suicide, “findings regarding overall suicide rates have been less consistent.” Here, they disguised the information that one does not need a gun to commit suicide. Something the Japanese already knew.

  • Recently, in October of 2017, Philip Cook and Harold Pollack published “Reducing Access to Guns by Violent Offenders.” still searching for ways to circumvent the Black Market and prevent criminal access to weapons, they appear to be descending into a kind of academic insanity, with no way out except to cave to the data.

They can't figure out how to control the black market, but they won't give up the attempt. They are stymied by problems with police-community relations and the Second Amendment.

They complain, “It is intrinsically difficult to prevent disqualified people from obtaining the guns they want when most Americans are entitled to possess all they want.”

So that, “in a sense the greater threat to public safety comes from the fact that these guns form a reservoir that supplies guns to future delinquents, gang members, convicted felons, and other offenders.”

Are we getting blamed again? Did we just go back in time, folks?

Cause that is where criminologists began decades ago, before the data gave us hard facts and answers.

This is where the international anti-gun community, the United Nations, and the world, is now, too. And it is why THEY are desperate to create the Arms Trade Treaty (a.k.a. ATT).

[NOTE: For more information, on the Global War On Guns, visit the websites “The Global War on Guns” and “Drs. Paul Gallant & Joanne Eisen PUBLICATIONS.” There you will find information back to the 1990s.]

Clyde Haberman assumes that the victory of pro-regulation forces lies in getting the law passed and implemented, whichever law it may be. He does not seem concerned with the outcome, only with the victory and the many false promises, in which he has faith.

This is what the new generation of firearm owner will face – the knowledge, or lack thereof, of researches like Cook, and his ilk, and the blind ignorance of David Hogg, and his handlers/backers.

Without knowing the answers of the past, our NEW GUN GENERATION will not be able to protect our Second Amendment from these rabid critters.

 

About the Authors:

Alan J Chwick has been involved with firearms much of his life and is the Retired Managing Coach of the Freeport NY Junior (Marksmanship) Club, Division of the Freeport NY Revolver & Rifle Association, Freeport, NY. He has escaped from New York State to South Carolina and is an SC FFL (www.Everything22andMore.com). – [email protected] | TWITTER: @iNCNF

Joanne D Eisen, DDS (Ret.) practiced dentistry on Long Island, NY. She has collaborated and written on firearm politics for the past 30+ years. She has also escaped from New York State but to Virginia. – [email protected]

  • 23 thoughts on “Gun Studies: Antis Descend Into Anger Because They Can’t Win On Facts

    1. Having lived in Germany in the 1960’s, and as a student of history, I refer you to the tactics of the “Sturm Abteilung,” AKA the S.A., or the “Brown Shirts” during the lead-up to the total takeover of power by Adolph Hitler. Anyone who dared speak out against the National Socialist Party (AKA the Nazis) and their goals were, at first, shouted down and accused of disloyalty to the nation and its’ people. Later, there were mobs in the streets, organized by the S.A., browbeating anyone who dared to speak out. Then came the physical threats, the beatings, the smashing of windows, and even removing those who had the temerity to speak up against these things from the businesses they frequented, and finally from their homes, only to be taken to “resettlement camps.” If we do not speak up and act against these tactics by the left, then the final result will be the same, all because we were not willing to learn from history!

    2. Here’a an idea to reduce gun violence that could appeal to both NRA types and anti-gun violence advocates. The United Nations’ World Health Organization says every year billions of dollars are spent worldwide on injuries related to punching incidents. Punching incidents often escalate in to using more deadly weapons – guns, knives, etc. So if you can reduce punching incidents it should reduce gun violence and other types of violence, including domestic violence. And by reducing domestic violence it could also reduce the number of people who commit gun atrocities, because most who commit such atrocities were raised in homes where they grew up experiencing domestic violence.

    3. My mother had a golden rule and I live by it to this day, and Hogg fits in this just right, DON’T ARGUE WITH SOMEBODY DUMBER THAN YOU!!!!!!!!!!! He sure fits and I won’t waste my time for any more comments about him!!!

    4. Hogg is running out of steam, the liberals have kicked him to the curb and his public display is at “O”. Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving hogg. At the time of the shooting he was at home and jumped on his bike and road to the school. This dude is old enough to be driving, maybe he couldn’t pass the driver’s test.

    5. I wouldn’t have on my hands what David the pig has in his mouth. Profanity is a weak mind trying to be forceful.

    6. Everytime I look at that pic the only thing that goes through my mind is:

      Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer!

    7. It’s one thing to look like a dill rod, it’s another to be paid to act like a dill rod, and then it is beyond all logic and comprehension to actually talk like a dill rod but it is totally off the charts to actually think that you are excelling in the career field of being a dill rod to the point where you might be contemplating of putting that on your resume as your first job from high school.

      I wonder if they make rubbers big enough to slide over this dick head so that we can try to prevent him from breeding? Then there’s the thought of somebody having to locate and slap the crap out of his parents we’re having spawned this thing?

    8. That’s cleaned up scientific jargon that means the black market trumps all the laws they can think of, short of repealing the Second Amendment

      Let them “repeal” that pesky Second….. it won’t change a thing.

      Don’t EVR forget that our Founders declared unabashedly that MY right to arms does NOT emanate from government, it predates government, is independent of it, is not subject to it, and instead of all that it comes from our CreatorGod, who gave us our very lives, and that that gift of life includes the gift of protecting it by whatever means might be available.

      So, let them repeal that Second. It changes nothing.

      Let Hogg Boy rage on. Sooner or later he will meet his due.

    9. This kid was kalifornia raised from what I understand. You know I don’t like talking about kids,but this little moron doesn’t give a person much choice.His platform needs to be took away. I don’t think we should be giving him that. Seems like every time this moron farts everyone is there to comment.It’s same ole shit.Unless he has something different to say I wouldn’t even mention his name. They probably follow web sites like this one.If nobody is talking about him,it would Probaly do more harm to him. I think he is the type of person that needs the spotlight on him.Turn the light off an he will Probaly fade away.

    10. We can’t forget Lyndon Johnson who was having affairs with 5 of the 8 secretaries he had and numerous other whores.

    11. Was his daddy a space alien, was mom abducted ? He has that “Little Grey” head shape and body…
      Hell, he even has the alien mindset “DISARM (the citizens)… DESTROY (the nation)” !

    12. Fix pimples, pay taxes, move out of parent’s home. Then, even some libs might listen to you. Until then STFU!!!!!

    13. People like Hogg are on the payroll of wealthy liberals .How else would they gain such recognition and press time ? The rich liberals find people like Hogg that are stupid enough to not see further than the money . They are being put in harm’s way 24 / 7 . Even if the have security it would be great for them if someone like Hogg would be harmed .
      Politicians couldn’t care less about citizen’s getting murdered . It is about control only . They need power . Let’s take Hillary as one example . How many women would stay with a husband like Bill Clinton with his infidelity ? His sexual adventures are known by most of the world . She stays with him because of power. That’s only one example.

      1. @PfF, Poor little Hogg has neither the talent nor intellect for any other job. No college would have him. Even his first try at fame is a demonstrable lie.

      1. Can’t tell if that is why the arm/hand is up OR someone photo shopped the bag of money given to him by the anti gun/liberal/Dems, that he was holding, out of the pic. Originally it was probably him holding the bag saying “they gave me this bag of money to spread lies about the school shooting and to spew hatred for law abiding citizens that own and/or carry firearms”. Hogg is a true commie driven and paid for piece of lying shit !

    Leave a Comment 23 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *